Literature DB >> 19038585

Method validation of protein biomarkers in support of drug development or clinical diagnosis/prognosis.

Jean W Lee1, Michael Hall.   

Abstract

Protein biomarkers are used for various purposes in drug development and clinical diagnosis and prognosis. In this review, a fit-for-purpose method validation approach is discussed that fulfills the needs of exploratory and advanced applications in both the pharmaceutical and diagnostic arenas. Method validation for protein biomarkers is typically applied to ligand binding assays (LBA) although hyphenated mass spectrometric methods can be used as adjunct methodologies to confirm LBA specificity or provide valuable information during early discovery or demonstrative phases of a novel biomarker. Pre-analytic variables of protein biomarkers, such as the purpose of the intended application, analyte(s), biological matrix, availability of reference standard, calibrator matrix, assay platform, and sample collection/handling, must be considered in any method development and validation plan. Method validation for exploratory applications involves basic experiments for assay range finding, accuracy and precision, selectivity, specificity, and minimal stability. For advanced method validation, more rigorous tests with a wider scope are performed. These tests include additional patient population ranges, more runs on accuracy and precision from multiple analysts/reagent lots/instruments, selectivity and specificity tests using patient samples, and stability tests subjected to conceivable conditions over long-term use. Differences in biomarker method validation for drug development vs. clinical diagnosis and issues of using developmental commercial kits are discussed. The co-development of biomarkers for drug development and diagnostics presents collaborative opportunities between the pharmaceutical and diagnostic sectors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19038585     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.11.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci        ISSN: 1570-0232            Impact factor:   3.205


  21 in total

Review 1.  Stable-isotope dilution LC–MS for quantitative biomarker analysis.

Authors:  Eugene Ciccimaro; Ian A Blair
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Recommendations for Selection and Characterization of Protein Biomarker Assay Calibrator Material.

Authors:  Kyra J Cowan; Lakshmi Amaravadi; Mark J Cameron; Damien Fink; Darshana Jani; Medha Kamat; Lindsay King; Robert J Neely; Yan Ni; Paul Rhyne; Renee Riffon; Yuda Zhu
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 3.  Fit-for-Purpose Immunohistochemical Biomarkers.

Authors:  Emina Emilia Torlakovic
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.943

4.  Development and validation of a microfluidic immunoassay capable of multiplexing parallel samples in microliter volumes.

Authors:  Mehdi Ghodbane; Elizabeth C Stucky; Tim J Maguire; Rene S Schloss; David I Shreiber; Jeffrey D Zahn; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 6.799

5.  Development and validation of a standardized ELISA for the detection of soluble Fc-epsilon-RI in human serum.

Authors:  Willem Lexmond; John van der Mee; Floortje Ruiter; Barbara Platzer; Georg Stary; Elizabeth H Yen; Eleonora Dehlink; Samuel Nurko; Edda Fiebiger
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  A Gyrolab Assay for the Quantitation of Free Complement Protein C5a in Human Plasma.

Authors:  Mark Dysinger; Mark Ma
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 7.  Blood cytokines as biomarkers of in vivo toxicity in preclinical safety assessment: considerations for their use.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Tarrant
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 8.  Proteomics and metabolomics in renal transplantation-quo vadis?

Authors:  Rahul Bohra; Jacek Klepacki; Jelena Klawitter; Jost Klawitter; Joshua M Thurman; Uwe Christians
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.782

Review 9.  Development of blood biomarkers for drug-induced liver injury: an evaluation of their potential for risk assessment and diagnostics.

Authors:  David E Amacher; Shelli J Schomaker; Jiri Aubrecht
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 10.  Applying proteomics to the diagnosis and treatment of ALS and related diseases.

Authors:  Robert Bowser; David Lacomis
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.