Literature DB >> 17614358

Specificity and selectivity evaluations of ligand binding assay of protein therapeutics against concomitant drugs and related endogenous proteins.

Jean Lee1, Hongjin Ma.   

Abstract

Macromolecule drugs designed against specific target proteins/ receptors have been applied in combination therapies, especially for complex and related diseases such as cancer for synergistic efficacy and alleviation of side effects. Protein therapeutics are typically measured using ligand binding assays (LBA). Evaluating the specificity and selectivity of LBA against their target proteins or in instances where concomitantly administered drugs are given was brought up during a conversation at the 3rd American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists/US Food and Drug Administration Bioanalytical Workshop but was not discussed at the meeting sessions. The purpose of this article is to discuss the challenges related to this issue and present a few approaches and experiences to elicit further discussions. Specificity and selectivity tests should be based on the anticipated levels of the individual therapeutics with reference to the dosing regimens defined in the clinical study protocol. When the concomitantly administered compound is available as a pure or well-defined material, various concentrations from zero to above the expected high levels are added to validation samples of the protein therapeutics to assess specificity. Recovery results from spiked samples of target patient populations on concomitant medications can also be compared with those from normal individuals for selectivity. If the drug has an endogenous counterpart, the baseline concentrations of each lot should be subtracted from the test samples in the selectivity assessment. This article illustrates a flexible approach to evaluating specificity and selectivity on samples from target patient populations receiving multiple medications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17614358      PMCID: PMC2751405          DOI: 10.1208/aapsj0902018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  14 in total

1.  Bioanalytical method validation--a revisit with a decade of progress.

Authors:  V P Shah; K K Midha; J W Findlay; H M Hill; J D Hulse; I J McGilveray; G McKay; K J Miller; R N Patnaik; M L Powell; A Tonelli; C T Viswanathan; A Yacobi
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Validation of immunoassays for bioanalysis: a pharmaceutical industry perspective.

Authors:  J W Findlay; W C Smith; J W Lee; G D Nordblom; I Das; B S DeSilva; M N Khan; R R Bowsher
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.935

3.  Workshop on bioanalytical methods validation for macromolecules: summary report.

Authors:  K J Miller; R R Bowsher; A Celniker; J Gibbons; S Gupta; J W Lee; S J Swanson; W C Smith; R S Weiner
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Recommendations for the bioanalytical method validation of ligand-binding assays to support pharmacokinetic assessments of macromolecules.

Authors:  Binodh DeSilva; Wendell Smith; Russell Weiner; Marian Kelley; JoMarie Smolec; Ben Lee; Masood Khan; Richard Tacey; Howard Hill; Abbie Celniker
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Effects of hormone replacement therapy on plasma pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines and some bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Pervin Vural; Cemil Akgul; Mukaddes Canbaz
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 7.658

6.  Effect of alpha-difluoromethyl-ornithine on the expression and function of the epidermal growth factor receptor in human breast epithelial cells in culture.

Authors:  A Manni; D Trout; M F Verderame; S Washington; D Mauger; L Demers
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Combination therapy of the chimeric monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody (infliximab) with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  C Antoni; J R Kalden
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.473

8.  Biochemical markers of bone metabolism and calciuria with inhaled budesonide therapy.

Authors:  Ipek Akil; Hasan Yüksel; Vildan Urk; Ahmet Var; Ece Onur
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 3.714

9.  Prognostic significance of angiogenic growth factor serum levels in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Christopher Heeschen; Stefanie Dimmeler; Christian W Hamm; Eric Boersma; Andreas M Zeiher; Maarten L Simoons
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Effect of combination therapy with matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor MMI-166 and mitomycin C on the growth and liver metastasis of human colon cancer.

Authors:  M Ohta; H Konno; T Tanaka; M Baba; K Kamiya; K Oba; T Kaneko; T Syouji; A Igarashi; S Nakamura
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  2001-06
View more
  5 in total

1.  Large molecule specific assay operation: recommendation for best practices and harmonization from the global bioanalysis consortium harmonization team.

Authors:  Lauren Stevenson; Marian Kelley; Boris Gorovits; Clare Kingsley; Heather Myler; Karolina Osterlund; Arumugam Muruganandam; Yoshiyuki Minamide; Mario Dominguez
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Impact of anti-drug antibodies in preclinical pharmacokinetic assessment.

Authors:  Theingi M Thway; Ivan Magana; Ami Bautista; Vibha Jawa; Wen Gu; Mark Ma
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Calculations for Adjusting Endogenous Biomarker Levels During Analytical Recovery Assessments for Ligand-Binding Assay Bioanalytical Method Validation.

Authors:  John F Marcelletti; Cindy L Evans; Manju Saxena; Adriana E Lopez
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Measurement of Free Versus Total Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibody in Pharmacokinetic Assessment is Modulated by Affinity, Incubation Time, and Bioanalytical Platform.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Talbot; Dominador Calamba; Melody Pai; Mark Ma; Theingi M Thway
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  "Fit-for-purpose" method validation and application of a biomarker (C-terminal telopeptides of type 1 collagen) in denosumab clinical studies.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Jean Lee; Daniel Burns; David Doherty; Laura Brunner; Mark Peterson; Binodh DeSilva
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 4.009

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.