Literature DB >> 12959633

Biomarkers, validation and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling.

Wayne A Colburn1, Jean W Lee.   

Abstract

Four elements are crucial to successful pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling and simulation for efficient and effective rational drug development: (i) mechanism-based biomarker selection and correlation to clinical endpoints; (ii) quantification of drug and/or metabolites in biological fluids under good laboratory practices (GLP); (iii) GLP-like biomarker method validation and measurements and; (iv) mechanism-based PK/PD modelling and validation. Biomarkers can provide great predictive value in early drug development if they reflect the mechanism of action for the intervention even if they do not become surrogate endpoints. PK/PD modelling and simulation can play a critical role in this process. Data from genomic and proteomics differentiating healthy versus disease states lead to biomarker discovery and identification. Multiple genes control complex diseases via hosts of gene products in biometabolic pathways and cell/organ signal transduction. Pilot exploratory studies should be conducted to identify pivotal biomarkers to be used for predictive clinical assessment of disease progression and the effect of drug intervention. Most biomarkers are endogenous macromolecules, which could be measured in biological fluids. Many exist in heterogeneous forms with varying activity and immunoreactivity, posting challenges for bioanalysis. Reliable and selective assays could be validated under a GLP-like environment for quantitative methods. While the need for consistent reference standards and quality control monitoring during sample analysis for biomarker assays are similar to that of drug molecules, many biomarkers have special requirements for sample collection that demand a well coordinated team management. Bioanalytical methods should be validated to meet study objectives at various drug development stages, and possess adequate performance to quantify biochemical responses specific to the target disease progression and drug intervention. Protocol design to produce sufficient data for PK/PD modelling would be more complex than that of PK. Knowledge of mechanism from discovery and preclinical studies are helpful for planning clinical study designs in cascade, sequential, crossover or replicate mode. The appropriate combination of biomarker identification and selection, bioanalytical methods development and validation for drugs and biomarkers, and mechanism-based PK/PD models for fitting data and predicting future clinical endpoints/outcomes provide powerful insights and guidance for effective and efficient rational drug development, toward safe and efficacious medicine for individual patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12959633     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200342120-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  55 in total

1.  Do plasma concentrations obtained from early arterial blood sampling improve pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling?

Authors:  T M Beaufort; J H Proost; K Kuizenga; M C Houwertjes; U W Kleef; J M Wierda
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1999-04

Review 2.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Use of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to design an optimal dose input profile.

Authors:  K Park; D Verotta; S K Gupta; L B Sheiner
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1998-08

4.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of AC137 (25,28,29 tripro-amylin, human) after intravenous bolus and infusion doses in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes.

Authors:  W A Colburn; A B Gottlieb; J Koda; O G Kolterman
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 5.  Immunoassays for detecting cytokines: what are they really measuring?

Authors:  A R Mire-Sluis; R Gaines-Das; R Thorpe
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1995-10-26       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 6.  Methodological issues in pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling.

Authors:  E Bellissant; V Sébille; G Paintaud
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  A nonparametric subject-specific population method for deconvolution: II. External validation.

Authors:  K E Fattinger; D Verotta
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1995-12

Review 8.  Basic concepts of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling.

Authors:  B Meibohm; H Derendorf
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.366

Review 9.  Drugs and endogenous ligands compete for receptor occupancy.

Authors:  W A Colburn
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 10.  Laser-capture microdissection: opening the microscopic frontier to molecular analysis.

Authors:  N L Simone; R F Bonner; J W Gillespie; M R Emmert-Buck; L A Liotta
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 11.639

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Integrated pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in drug development.

Authors:  Jasper Dingemanse; Silke Appel-Dingemanse
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Sperm chromatin: fertile grounds for proteomic discovery of clinical tools.

Authors:  Tammy F Wu; Diana S Chu
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2008-05-25       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 3.  Development of translational pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models.

Authors:  D E Mager; W J Jusko
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the inhibitory effects of naproxen on the time-courses of inflammatory pain, fever, and the ex vivo synthesis of TXB2 and PGE2 in rats.

Authors:  Elke H J Krekels; Marie Angesjö; Ingemo Sjögren; Kristina Angeby Möller; Odd-Geir Berge; Sandra A G Visser
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Pharmacokinetic modeling of non-linear brain distribution of fluvoxamine in the rat.

Authors:  Marian Geldof; Jan Freijer; Ludy van Beijsterveldt; Meindert Danhof
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Cornelia B Landersdorfer; William J Jusko
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Nanovehicular intracellular delivery systems.

Authors:  Ales Prokop; Jeffrey M Davidson
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 8.  Breath volatile organic compounds for the gut-fatty liver axis: promise, peril, and path forward.

Authors:  Steven Francis Solga
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of fluvoxamine 5-HT transporter occupancy in rat frontal cortex.

Authors:  M Geldof; J I Freijer; L van Beijsterveldt; X Langlois; M Danhof
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  Validation of a flow cytometry based chemokine internalization assay for use in evaluating the pharmacodynamic response to a receptor antagonist.

Authors:  Timothy Wyant; Alan Lackey; Marie Green
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.