The causative agent of Lyme borreliosis, the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi, has been shown to induce expression of the urokinase receptor (uPAR); however, the role of uPAR in the immune response against Borrelia has never been investigated. uPAR not only acts as a proteinase receptor, but can also, dependently or independently of ligation to uPA, directly affect leukocyte function. We here demonstrate that uPAR is upregulated on murine and human leukocytes upon exposure to B. burgdorferi both in vitro as well as in vivo. Notably, B. burgdorferi-inoculated C57BL/6 uPAR knock-out mice harbored significantly higher Borrelia numbers compared to WT controls. This was associated with impaired phagocytotic capacity of B. burgdorferi by uPAR knock-out leukocytes in vitro. B. burgdorferi numbers in vivo, and phagocytotic capacity in vitro, were unaltered in uPA, tPA (low fibrinolytic activity) and PAI-1 (high fibrinolytic activity) knock-out mice compared to WT controls. Strikingly, in uPAR knock-out mice partially backcrossed to a B. burgdorferi susceptible C3H/HeN background, higher B. burgdorferi numbers were associated with more severe carditis and increased local TLR2 and IL-1beta mRNA expression. In conclusion, in B. burgdorferi infection, uPAR is required for phagocytosis and adequate eradication of the spirochete from the heart by a mechanism that is independent of binding of uPAR to uPA or its role in the fibrinolytic system.
The causative agent of Lyme borreliosis, the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi, has been shown to induce expression of the urokinase receptor (uPAR); however, the role of uPAR in the immune response against Borrelia has never been investigated. uPAR not only acts as a proteinase receptor, but can also, dependently or independently of ligation to uPA, directly affect leukocyte function. We here demonstrate that uPAR is upregulated on murine and human leukocytes upon exposure to B. burgdorferi both in vitro as well as in vivo. Notably, B. burgdorferi-inoculated C57BL/6 uPAR knock-out mice harbored significantly higher Borrelia numbers compared to WT controls. This was associated with impaired phagocytotic capacity of B. burgdorferi by uPAR knock-out leukocytes in vitro. B. burgdorferi numbers in vivo, and phagocytotic capacity in vitro, were unaltered in uPA, tPA (low fibrinolytic activity) and PAI-1 (high fibrinolytic activity) knock-out mice compared to WT controls. Strikingly, in uPAR knock-out mice partially backcrossed to a B. burgdorferi susceptible C3H/HeN background, higher B. burgdorferi numbers were associated with more severe carditis and increased local TLR2 and IL-1beta mRNA expression. In conclusion, in B. burgdorferi infection, uPAR is required for phagocytosis and adequate eradication of the spirochete from the heart by a mechanism that is independent of binding of uPAR to uPA or its role in the fibrinolytic system.
Lyme borreliosis, an emerging tick-borne disease in both the New and Old world, is
caused by spirochetes belonging to the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu
lato group and is predominantly transmitted by Ixodes ticks [1]. In
the United States Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto, from here on
referred to as B. burgdorferi, is the only prevalent
Borrelia species, whereas in Europe three
Borrelia species - B. burgdorferi,
Borrelia garinii and Borrelia afzelii
– are able to cause Lyme borreliosis [2],[3]. In humans, all three
species frequently cause an erythematous cutaneous lesion, erythema
migrans. In later stages of infection spirochetes can disseminate and cause
disease that affects the joints, cardiac conduction system, central nervous system
and the skin [4].Borrelia has been shown to differentially express specific genes to
inhibit, modulate or to bypass the host immune system [5] and to bind to host
molecules in order to establish a persisting infection. In addition, B.
burgdorferi can interact with the host fibrinolytic system [6].
B. burgdorferi abuses host plasminogen activators to activate
plasminogen within the tick gut to facilitate migration through the arthropod vector
[7].
However, plasminogen is not critical for transmission and infection, since
plasminogen deficient mice do develop an infection after intradermal inoculation
with B. burgdorferi
[7]. In
in vitro studies, the spirochete causes upregulation of the urokinase Plasminogen
Activator (uPA) [8],[9], the Plasminogen Activator Inhibitors (PAI)-1 and
2 [10],[11], and the uPA Receptor (uPAR; CD87; PLAUR) [12],[13]. uPAR
is a multi-ligand receptor with a high affinity for uPA, but also vitronectin, many
integrins and G-protein-coupled receptors, and is expressed by many different cell
types, including leukocytes [14]. Binding of uPA to uPAR results in formation of
plasmin at the leading edge of cells facilitating leukocyte migration by
pericellular proteolysis of extracellular matrix proteins [14]. Besides functioning
as a proteinase receptor, uPAR also affects leukocyte migration and adhesion [15]–[20], as well as
phagocytosis [19],[21], through intracellular signaling. This occurs, in
part, independently of ligation of uPA by uPAR [22],[23].Importantly, uPAR has been shown to contribute to activation and mobilization of
leukocytes in bacterial infections [14],[15],[19]–[24]. To elucidate the role
and function of uPAR in the development of Lyme borreliosis in vivo we infected
wildtype (WT) and uPAR knock-out C57BL/6 mice with B. burgdorferi
sensu stricto and monitored B. burgdorferi numbers in multiple
organs, histopathological changes of tibiotarsi and heart, and host immune
responses. In addition, to investigate whether the observed phenotype in uPAR
knock-out C57BL/6 mice was dependent on uPAR's role in the fibrinolytic
system or dependent on the interaction with uPA we also investigated the course of
Lyme borreliosis in tPA, PAI-1 and uPA knock-out C57BL/6 mice. Moreover, we
investigated the course of Borrelia infection in uPAR knock-out
mice partially backcrossed to a C3H/HeN genetic background to assess the role of
uPAR in mice more susceptible for infection with B.
burgdorferi.
Results
Borrelia burgdorferi upregulates uPAR expression in mice and
humans
Previous reports have shown that uPAR is upregulated on both a monocytic cell
line and primary monocytes upon activation with B. burgdorferi
[12],[13]. We here show that
in vitro stimulation with different concentrations of viable B.
burgdorferi resulted in significantly increased uPAR expression on
both murine peritoneal macrophages and ex vivo generated – peripheral
blood mononuclear cells-derived - human macrophages (
and
). In addition, using murine and human whole blood we observed similar
results for granulocytes and monocytes (
and
). By contrast, non-phagocytotic cells, i.e. T lymphocytes, did not
upregulate uPAR upon ex vivo exposure to B. burgdorferi (
). Other Borrelia species, such as B.
garinii strain PBi and B. afzelii strain pKo - both
able to cause Lyme borreliosis - also induced enhanced uPAR expression on
leukocytes (data not shown). To determine whether uPAR is upregulated in humans
upon B. burgdorferi infection, we quantified uPAR expression in
transcutaneous skin biopsies from B. burgdorferi PCR and
culture confirmed positive erythema migranspatients and healthy controls. We
could not detect uPAR expression in control patients, where as we could easily
detect uPAR expression in the diseased group (
). Lastly, in WT C57BL/6 mice inoculated intraperitoneally with viable
B. burgdorferi for 1 hour we observed a significant
upregulation of uPAR on the surface of (F4/80 positive) macrophages (
).
Figure 1
Borrelia burgdorferi induces upregulation of the
urokinase receptor on murine and human leukocytes in vitro and in vivo.
(A) Viable B. burgdorferi induces uPAR expression on
murine and human macrophages. Murine peritoneal macrophages, and ex vivo
generated human macrophages, (1×105) were
stimulated with viable Borrelia burgdorferi (strain
B31) for 16 hours (Cell∶B.
burgdorferi = 1∶10
or 1∶100). Cells were harvested and analyzed for uPAR
expression by FACS analysis. (B) Viable B. burgdorferi
induces uPAR expression on murine and human granulocytes and monocytes.
Murine and human whole blood was incubated with viable B.
burgdorferi for 16 hours. Erythrocytes were lysed and cells
were co-stained for granulocytes or monocytes markers and uPAR and
analyzed by FACS analysis. (C) Expression of uPAR is increased in skin
biopsies from Lyme borreliosis patients. Total RNA was isolated from
biopsies derived from culture and PCR confirmed B.
burgdorferi positive erythema migrans lesions from Lyme
borreliosis patients (n = 5) or healthy
controls (n = 5) and subjected to
quantitative uPAR and β-actin RT-PCR. We could not detect uPAR
mRNA in healthy controls, for these samples the level of uPAR mRNA was
set at the detection limit. Expression of uPAR mRNA was corrected for
β-actin mRNA expression and depicted as a relative number.
Expression of uPAR of one of the healthy controls was set at 1. Graphs
in panels (A and B) are representative of at least three independent
experiments and error bars represent the mean of triplicates within one
experiment±SEM. A p-value<0.05 was
considered statistically significant. * indicating
p<0,05; **
p<0,01 and ***
p<0,001.
Borrelia burgdorferi induces upregulation of the
urokinase receptor on murine and human leukocytes in vitro and in vivo.
(A) Viable B. burgdorferi induces uPAR expression on
murine and human macrophages. Murine peritoneal macrophages, and ex vivo
generated human macrophages, (1×105) were
stimulated with viable Borrelia burgdorferi (strain
B31) for 16 hours (Cell∶B.
burgdorferi = 1∶10
or 1∶100). Cells were harvested and analyzed for uPAR
expression by FACS analysis. (B) Viable B. burgdorferi
induces uPAR expression on murine and human granulocytes and monocytes.
Murine and human whole blood was incubated with viable B.
burgdorferi for 16 hours. Erythrocytes were lysed and cells
were co-stained for granulocytes or monocytes markers and uPAR and
analyzed by FACS analysis. (C) Expression of uPAR is increased in skin
biopsies from Lyme borreliosispatients. Total RNA was isolated from
biopsies derived from culture and PCR confirmed B.
burgdorferi positive erythema migrans lesions from Lyme
borreliosis patients (n = 5) or healthy
controls (n = 5) and subjected to
quantitative uPAR and β-actin RT-PCR. We could not detect uPAR
mRNA in healthy controls, for these samples the level of uPAR mRNA was
set at the detection limit. Expression of uPAR mRNA was corrected for
β-actin mRNA expression and depicted as a relative number.
Expression of uPAR of one of the healthy controls was set at 1. Graphs
in panels (A and B) are representative of at least three independent
experiments and error bars represent the mean of triplicates within one
experiment±SEM. A p-value<0.05 was
considered statistically significant. * indicating
p<0,05; **
p<0,01 and ***
p<0,001.
C57BL/6 uPAR knock-out mice exhibit increased B. burgdorferi
numbers in vivo and impaired phagocytosis of B. burgdorferi in
vitro
To assess the role of uPAR in the immune response against B.
burgdorferi vivo, we infected C57BL/6 WT and uPAR knock-out mice with
B. burgdorferi and sacrificed mice two and four weeks post
infection. By quantitative PCR we assessed B. burgdorferi
numbers in skin, bladder and tibiotarsi post mortem. C57BL/6 uPAR deficient mice
harbored higher B. burgdorferi numbers compared to WT animals
in all tissues examined. This was most pronounced, and statistically
significant, four weeks post infection (
). These data were underscored by the fact that two weeks post infection
only 3/8 bladder tissue cultures were positive in WT mice versus 7/7 in uPAR
knock-out mice (Chi-square p = 0,026). We did
not determine B. burgdorferi numbers in cardiac tissue in these
experiments since the heart were used in toto for histopathology. In line with
higher systemic B. burgdorferi numbers in uPAR deficient mice a
significant increase in total IgG against B. burgdorferi over
time (
), and significantly higher IgG1 antibody levels four week post
infection, were observed (
). We detected no differences in IgM and IgG2b subclass-levels four weeks
post infection (data not shown). To obtain a first insight into the mechanism by
which uPAR deficiency could impact pathogen burden after infection with
B. burgdorferi we stimulated leukocytes with viable
spirochetes in vitro. We harvested peritoneal macrophages from C57BL/6 WT and
uPAR knock-out mice, which we stimulated with viable B.
burgdorferi
(Cell∶Borrelia = 1∶50)
for 16 hours. We demonstrate that Borrelia induced similar
cytokine levels in WT and uPAR deficient macrophages (
). We obtained comparable results when we stimulated whole blood in a
similar fashion (data not shown). Next, because uPAR has been shown to play a
crucial role in phagocytosis of Escherichia coli by neutrophils
[19],[21],[22], we
investigated whether WT and uPAR knock-out neutrophils and macrophages differed
in their capacity to phagocytose B. burgdorferi. In these
assays extracellular bacteria were quenched by addition of a quenching dye
containing Trypan blue. We demonstrate that both uPAR knock-out neutrophils (in
whole blood) and uPAR knock-out peritoneal macrophages were significantly less
capable of phagocytosing B. burgdorferi, using either
heat-killed FITC-labeled or viable CFSE-labeled B. burgdorferi
(
and
). Confocal microscopy confirmed labeled bacteria were localized
intracellularly (
). To distinguish between binding and
phagocytosis we performed similar experiments, but at 4°C and without
the addition of quenching solution. These experiments showed no difference in
the capacity of WT and uPAR deficient leukocytes to bind B.
burgdorferi (
). In addition, binding experiments with recombinant humanuPAR and
viable B. burgdorferi failed to show direct binding of the
spirochete to uPAR (data not shown). Since uPAR has been shown to be of
importance in the migration of leukocytes, we also investigated whether there
was impaired migration of leukocytes in B. burgdorferi-infected
uPAR knock-out mice. We intradermally inoculated C57BL/6 WT and uPAR knock-out
mice with B. burgdorferi or controls and harvested skin at 0, 6
or 32 hours post infection. We did not observe influx of immune cells at
t = 0 (data not shown). By H&E, Ly6G
and F4/80 stainings on sagittal skin sections we did observe an evident influx
of immune cells and inflammation at t = 6
hours, however there were no differences between WT and uPAR knock-out mice
(
). As has been shown by others [25], the predominant cells
at this early time point were granulocytes (
). Importantly, these data show that the phenotype in uPAR knock-out mice
is not explained by impaired influx of immune cells at the site of inoculation
allowing for more dissemination of the spirochete. By contrast, later in the
course of infection, at t = 32 hours, we
observed a more pronounced influx of macrophages in uPAR knock-out mice compared
to WT controls, which probably is explained by the increased
Borrelia burden in uPAR knock-out mice (
). In conclusion, higher B. burgdorferi numbers in
C57BL/6 uPAR knock-out mice compared to WT mice could be explained by a
decreased phagocytotic capacity of uPAR deficient leukocytes observed in vitro,
but not by impaired migration of uPAR deficient leukocytes.
Figure 2
The urokinase receptor (uPAR) is involved in clearance of B.
burgdorferi.
(A) Urokinase receptor knock-out C57BL/6 mice display higher systemic
B. burgdorferi numbers. WT and uPAR
−/− mice were inoculated with B.
burgdorferi and sacrificed two and four weeks post infection.
DNA was extracted from the indicated tissues and subjected to
quantitative Borrelia flab and mouse
β-actin PCR. In sham inoculated mice (2 to
3 per group) we did not detect B. burgdorferi DNA. Six
to eight mice per group were used and bars represent the
mean±SEM. (B and C) Urokinase receptor knock-out C57BL/6 mice
develop more rigorous IgG responses. Sera from C57BL/6 WT and uPAR
knock-out mice, 2 and 4 weeks post B. burgdorferi (B
burg) or sham inoculation (SHAM) was used for whole cell B.
burgdorferi ELISA. Thus, we determined total IgG directed
against B. burgdorferi (B) and IgG subclasses, of which
only IgG1 (C) is shown. (D) WT and uPAR −/−
macrophages produce similar levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines when
exposed to viable B. burgdorferi in vitro. Peritoneal
macrophages were stimulated with control medium (medium) or B.
burgdorferi (B burg) for 16 hours. The supernatant was
analyzed for cytokine production using a mouse inflammation cytometric
bead array. (E and F) Urokinase receptor deficient granulocytes and
macrophages are incapable of adequately phagocytosing B.
burgdorferi. Whole blood or peritoneal macrophages were
incubated with CFSE-labeled viable or heat-killed FITC-labeled
B. burgdorferi at 37°C or at 4°C as
a control. Phagocytosis was stopped by transferring the tubes to ice and
extracellular bacteria were quenched by addition of a quenching dye
containing Trypan blue. When whole blood was used erythrocytes were
lysed before cells were DAPI stained and subjected to fluorescent
microscopy (E) or stained for Gr-1 (granulocytes) and subjected to FACS
analysis (F; left panel). Peritoneal macrophages were directly subjected
to FACS analysis (F; right panel). Phagocytosis was depicted as the
phagocytosis index [64],[65]: mean
fluorescence intensity (MFI)×percentage (%)
positive cells) at 37°C minus (MFI×%
positive cells at 4°C). Six to eight mice per group were used,
graphs represent the mean±SEM and are representative of three
independent experiments. (G) B. burgdorferi binds
equally well to WT and uPAR −/− macrophages. A
similar experiment as described in (F) was performed, albeit at
4°C and without the addition of quenching dye to determine
binding of B. burgdorferi to peritoneal macrophages.
Binding is expressed as the binding index: % CFSE positive
cells×MFI. Four to six mice per group were used and bars
represent the mean±SEM. The experiment was repeated twice. A
p-value<0.05 was considered statistically
significant. * indicating p<0,05;
** p<0,01 and
*** p<0,001.
Figure 3
Leukocyte migration in uPAR knock-out mice in response to B.
burgdorferi infection in vivo.
C57BL/6 WT and uPAR knock-out mice were intradermally injected with
1×106
B. burgdorferi in PBS in the midline of the neck and
mice were sacrificed 6 or 32 hours post inoculation. Skin was harvested,
formalin fixed and imbedded in paraffin. Five µm-thick
sagittal skin sections were processed and H&E, Ly6G and F4/80
stained by routine histological techniques. Control animals injected
with PBS alone did not display influx of leukocytes (data not shown).
Slides were scored for influx of leukocytes by an independent
pathologist who was blinded to the experimental design. Influx was
semi-quantitatively scored on a scale from 0–3, with 0 being
no, 1 mild, 2 moderate, and 3 being severe diffuse infiltration. Per
group and time point 5 five mice were used, error bars represent SEM.
Representative sections are depicted in the figure. A
p-value<0.05 was considered statistically
significant. * indicating p<0,05, i.e.
p = 0,0259; NS, not significant, i.e.
p = 0,1475.
The urokinase receptor (uPAR) is involved in clearance of B.
burgdorferi.
(A) Urokinase receptor knock-out C57BL/6 mice display higher systemic
B. burgdorferi numbers. WT and uPAR
−/− mice were inoculated with B.
burgdorferi and sacrificed two and four weeks post infection.
DNA was extracted from the indicated tissues and subjected to
quantitative Borrelia flab and mouse
β-actin PCR. In sham inoculated mice (2 to
3 per group) we did not detect B. burgdorferi DNA. Six
to eight mice per group were used and bars represent the
mean±SEM. (B and C) Urokinase receptor knock-out C57BL/6 mice
develop more rigorous IgG responses. Sera from C57BL/6 WT and uPAR
knock-out mice, 2 and 4 weeks post B. burgdorferi (B
burg) or sham inoculation (SHAM) was used for whole cell B.
burgdorferi ELISA. Thus, we determined total IgG directed
against B. burgdorferi (B) and IgG subclasses, of which
only IgG1 (C) is shown. (D) WT and uPAR −/−
macrophages produce similar levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines when
exposed to viable B. burgdorferi in vitro. Peritoneal
macrophages were stimulated with control medium (medium) or B.
burgdorferi (B burg) for 16 hours. The supernatant was
analyzed for cytokine production using a mouseinflammation cytometric
bead array. (E and F) Urokinase receptor deficient granulocytes and
macrophages are incapable of adequately phagocytosing B.
burgdorferi. Whole blood or peritoneal macrophages were
incubated with CFSE-labeled viable or heat-killed FITC-labeled
B. burgdorferi at 37°C or at 4°C as
a control. Phagocytosis was stopped by transferring the tubes to ice and
extracellular bacteria were quenched by addition of a quenching dye
containing Trypan blue. When whole blood was used erythrocytes were
lysed before cells were DAPI stained and subjected to fluorescent
microscopy (E) or stained for Gr-1 (granulocytes) and subjected to FACS
analysis (F; left panel). Peritoneal macrophages were directly subjected
to FACS analysis (F; right panel). Phagocytosis was depicted as the
phagocytosis index [64],[65]: mean
fluorescence intensity (MFI)×percentage (%)
positive cells) at 37°C minus (MFI×%
positive cells at 4°C). Six to eight mice per group were used,
graphs represent the mean±SEM and are representative of three
independent experiments. (G) B. burgdorferi binds
equally well to WT and uPAR −/− macrophages. A
similar experiment as described in (F) was performed, albeit at
4°C and without the addition of quenching dye to determine
binding of B. burgdorferi to peritoneal macrophages.
Binding is expressed as the binding index: % CFSE positive
cells×MFI. Four to six mice per group were used and bars
represent the mean±SEM. The experiment was repeated twice. A
p-value<0.05 was considered statistically
significant. * indicating p<0,05;
** p<0,01 and
*** p<0,001.
Leukocyte migration in uPAR knock-out mice in response to B.
burgdorferi infection in vivo.
C57BL/6 WT and uPAR knock-out mice were intradermally injected with
1×106
B. burgdorferi in PBS in the midline of the neck and
mice were sacrificed 6 or 32 hours post inoculation. Skin was harvested,
formalin fixed and imbedded in paraffin. Five µm-thick
sagittal skin sections were processed and H&E, Ly6G and F4/80
stained by routine histological techniques. Control animals injected
with PBS alone did not display influx of leukocytes (data not shown).
Slides were scored for influx of leukocytes by an independent
pathologist who was blinded to the experimental design. Influx was
semi-quantitatively scored on a scale from 0–3, with 0 being
no, 1 mild, 2 moderate, and 3 being severe diffuse infiltration. Per
group and time point 5 five mice were used, error bars represent SEM.
Representative sections are depicted in the figure. A
p-value<0.05 was considered statistically
significant. * indicating p<0,05, i.e.
p = 0,0259; NS, not significant, i.e.
p = 0,1475.
Higher B. burgdorferi numbers and impaired phagocytotic
capacity in C57BL/6 uPAR knock-out mice are independent of ligation of uPA to
uPAR
Since uPAR has been suggested to affect function of leukocytes in both an
uPA-dependent as well as an uPA-independent fashion we also assessed the course
of B. burgdorferi infection in C57BL/6 uPA knock-out mice. Both
2 and 4 weeks post B. burgdorferi infection, C57BL/6 WT and uPA
deficient mice displayed similar Borrelia numbers in all
tissues examined as detected by quantitative PCR (
). In addition, compared to WT controls, uPA deficient neutrophils and
peritoneal macrophages were equally capable of phagocytosing B.
burgdorferi (
). These data suggest that the phenotype observed in C57BL/6 uPAR
knock-out mice was independent of ligation of uPA to uPAR.
Figure 4
The urokinase activator (uPA) is not involved in clearance of the
spirochete.
(A) Urokinase activator knock-out C57BL/6 mice display similar systemic
B. burgdorferi numbers compared to WT controls. WT
and uPA −/− mice were inoculated with B.
burgdorferi and sacrificed two and four weeks post
infection. DNA was extracted from the indicated tissues and subjected to
quantitative Borrelia flab and mouse
β-actin PCR. Six to eight mice per group
were used and B. burgdorferi numbers are depicted as
described in Figure
2A. (B) Urokinase activator deficient granulocytes and
macrophages (solid lines) are just as capable as WT controls (dotted
lines) of phagocytosing B. burgdorferi. Phagocytosis
assays were performed as described in Figure 2F. Six to eight mice per
group were used, error bars represent SEM and the graphs are
representative of two independent experiments. A
p-value<0,05 was considered statistically
significant.
The urokinase activator (uPA) is not involved in clearance of the
spirochete.
(A) Urokinase activator knock-out C57BL/6 mice display similar systemic
B. burgdorferi numbers compared to WT controls. WT
and uPA −/− mice were inoculated with B.
burgdorferi and sacrificed two and four weeks post
infection. DNA was extracted from the indicated tissues and subjected to
quantitative Borrelia flab and mouse
β-actin PCR. Six to eight mice per group
were used and B. burgdorferi numbers are depicted as
described in Figure
2A. (B) Urokinase activator deficient granulocytes and
macrophages (solid lines) are just as capable as WT controls (dotted
lines) of phagocytosing B. burgdorferi. Phagocytosis
assays were performed as described in Figure 2F. Six to eight mice per
group were used, error bars represent SEM and the graphs are
representative of two independent experiments. A
p-value<0,05 was considered statistically
significant.
Higher B. burgdorferi numbers and impaired phagocytotic
capacity in C57BL/6 uPAR knock-out mice are independent of uPAR's role
in the fibrinolytic system
Next, since uPAR has been shown to affect function of leukocytes through its role
in the fibrinolytic system [14], we infected mice in which the activity of
the fibrinolytic system was either impaired, i.e. C57BL/6 tPA deficient mice, or
enhanced, i.e. C57BL/6 PAI-1 knock-out mice. First we demonstrated that
B. burgdorferi infection did not influence fibrinolytic
activity in citrate plasma in either mouse strain, or WT controls, as measured
by amidolytic plasminogen activator activity assays (
). Next, we showed that, compared to C57BL/6 WT mice, both C57BL/6 tPA
and as PAI-1 knock-out mice display normal Borrelia numbers in
various tissues two weeks (
) and four weeks (data not shown) post infection, as detected by
quantitative PCR and tissue culture (data not shown). In line with these data,
phagocytotic capacity of C57BL/6 tPA and PAI-1 deficient neutrophils was
comparable to that of WT mice (
). Importantly, uPAR knock-out mice, regardless whether they were
infected with B. burgdorferi, have comparable fibrinolytic
activity to WT mice (data not shown). Together these data indicate that the
impaired phagocytotic capacity of uPAR deficient mice, resulting in higher
spirochete numbers upon B. burgdorferi infection in vivo, is
not dependent on the role of uPAR in fibrinolysis.
Table 1
B. burgdorferi infection in WT, tPA
−/− and PAI-1 −/− mice.
Note. C57BL/6 WT, tPA and PAI-1 knock-out mice
(6–8 per group) were inoculated with B.
burgdorferi strain B31 or sham and sacrificed two weeks
later.
Plasminogen activator (PA) activity was measured in citrate plasma
using amidolytic assays and expressed as a percentage.
B. burgdorferi numbers were determined by
quantitative PCR and expressed as described in
and
.
In addition, an in vitro phagocytosis assay was performed using naive
mice (n = 6–8 per group)
as described in
. Whole blood was incubated with viable CFSE-labeled
B. burgdorferi for 60 minutes at 37 or
4°C as a control and phagocytosis was depicted as the
phagocytosis index as described in
.
PA activity was significantly lower in tPA knock-out mice compared to
WT controls, regardless whether mice were inoculated with B.
burgdorferi or sham,
p<0,0001.
PA activity was significantly higher in PAI-1 knock-out mice compared
to WT controls, regardless whether mice were inoculated with
B. burgdorferi or sham,
p<0,0001.
Results represent the mean±SEM. Non-parametric statistical
tests were used to analyze the differences between the groups. A
p-value<0,05 was considered
statistically significant.
Note. C57BL/6 WT, tPA and PAI-1 knock-out mice
(6–8 per group) were inoculated with B.
burgdorferi strain B31 or sham and sacrificed two weeks
later.Plasminogen activator (PA) activity was measured in citrate plasma
using amidolytic assays and expressed as a percentage.B. burgdorferi numbers were determined by
quantitative PCR and expressed as described in
and
.In addition, an in vitro phagocytosis assay was performed using naive
mice (n = 6–8 per group)
as described in
. Whole blood was incubated with viable CFSE-labeled
B. burgdorferi for 60 minutes at 37 or
4°C as a control and phagocytosis was depicted as the
phagocytosis index as described in
.PA activity was significantly lower in tPA knock-out mice compared to
WT controls, regardless whether mice were inoculated with B.
burgdorferi or sham,
p<0,0001.PA activity was significantly higher in PAI-1 knock-out mice compared
to WT controls, regardless whether mice were inoculated with
B. burgdorferi or sham,
p<0,0001.Results represent the mean±SEM. Non-parametric statistical
tests were used to analyze the differences between the groups. A
p-value<0,05 was considered
statistically significant.
The effect of uPAR deficiency on the development of Lyme borreliosis
We assessed carditis severity in B. burgdorferi inoculated
C57BL/6 uPAR knock-out and WT mice two and four weeks post infection. Two weeks
post infection, in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sagittal sections
of mouse hearts, we found comparable carditis severity scores in C57BL/6 WT and
uPAR knock-out mice (
). The localization and severity of carditis in our
experiments using C57BL/6 mice appeared to be similar to the localization and
carditis severities reported by ourselves and others using the same, relatively
resistant, mouse strain [26]–[29]. Sham inoculated
mice did not develop carditis (data not shown). We were unable to reliably score
carditis four weeks post infection, since, as observed by others, at this stage,
carditis was characterized by an organizing rather than ongoing inflammation
(
) [26]. However, in 4/8 uPAR deficient mice and 0/8
WT mice a mild active carditis, characterized by the presence of small cellular
infiltrates at the aortic root, could still be observed 4 weeks post inoculation
(Chi-square p = 0,021) (data not shown). By
contrast, in 5/8 of WT mice and only in 2/8 uPAR deficient mice we observed
organized inflammatory infiltrates, characterized by sharply delineated foci
(
) of mononuclear leukocytes situated in the atrial wall (Chi-square
p = 0,0721). Together these findings suggest a
difference with respect to the kinetics of the organization of carditis in
C57BL/6 uPAR knock-out and WT mice. In line with the observed normal
Borrelia numbers, in uPA, tPA and PAI-1 knock-out mice
severity of carditis was comparable to that in WT mice (
). Together these data demonstrate that, despite
higher B. burgdorferi numbers, C57BL/6 uPAR knock-out mice
develop carditis with a similar severity, albeit for a prolonged period of time,
compared to WT controls. Finally, although we observed ankle swelling in both WT
and uPAR C57BL/6 knock-out mice during the course of infection, histological
examination of H&E stained section of tibiotarsi did not reveal any
signs of arthritis 2, 4 or 6 weeks post infection (data not shown).
The course of B. burgdorferi infection in uPAR deficient
mice on a B. burgdorferi susceptible genetic background
To further investigate the effect of uPAR deficiency on the development of Lyme
borreliosis symptoms we generated uPAR deficient mice on a more
Borrelia susceptible genetic background. It is well-known that
C57BL/6 mice are relatively resistant to B. burgdorferi and
develop less severe symptoms after infection with the spirochete, and that
C3H/HeN mice are more susceptible and develop more severe symptoms after
infection with B. burgdorferi
[30]. In
addition, it has been described that F1 of WT C57BL/6 crossed with (x) C3H/HeN
mice are intermediately sensitive to B. burgdorferi infection
[30].
Therefore we investigated the course of Lyme borreliosis in F2 of
C57BL/6×C3H/HeN uPAR knock-out mice and WT littermate controls. We
first showed that, similar to uPAR knock-out mice on a pure C57BL/6 background,
these mice harbor higher Borrelia numbers in multiple tissues
compared to WT littermate controls two weeks post infection (
), indicating that the lack of uPAR in these mice also resulted in
impaired phagocytosis and increased pathogen burden. Indeed, in in vitro
phagocytosis assays, compared to WT littermate controls,
C57BL/6×C3H/HeN uPAR deficient neutrophils were significantly less
capable of phagocytosing B. burgdorferi (
). Strikingly, compared to WT littermate controls (
), C57BL/6×C3H/HeN uPAR knock-out mice developed significantly
more severe carditis (
), reflected by influx of greater numbers of leukocytes in more and
larger parts of cardiac tissue two weeks post infection (
). As has been shown by others the main cells involved in inflammation
were macrophages, as determined by F4/80 immunostaining (
).
By multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), we detected
significantly increased levels of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-1 Receptor
Associated Kinase (IRAK)-3, and toll-like receptor (TLR)2 mRNA in hearts from
uPAR knock-out mice compared to WT littermate controls two weeks post infection
(
), consistent with the observed higher B. burgdorferi
numbers and more severe cardiac inflammation in uPAR knock-out mice. Since, uPAR
has also been shown to enhance migration of leukocytes towards the site of
infection for some, but not all bacteria, in these mice we performed in vitro
migration assays with WT and uPAR deficient macrophages (
). We observed impaired migration of uPAR deficient macrophages to C5a
(
), however not to supernatant from a cardiomyoblastic rodent cell line
(
), compared to migration of WT macrophages, which is in line with our in
vivo observations in C57BL/6 mice, In this in vitro setting, whether or not this
cell line was stimulated with viable B. burgdorferi did not
affect migration of WT and uPAR deficient macrophages, which might be due to
production of both stimulating and inhibitory chemotactic stimuli of these
cardiomyoblastic cells upon exposure to B. burgdorferi, as has
been recently shown for neutrophils [31]. WT and uPAR
deficient C57BL/6×C3H/HeN mice developed comparable ankle swelling
during the course of B. burgdorferi infection (
), however despite the more susceptible phenotype of these mice compared
to C57BL/6 mice, these mice did not develop any histological signs of arthritis,
as determined by hematoxylin and eosin staining, but also Ly6G - a marker for
granulocytes - immunostaining (data not shown). In line with these data, post
mortem radiological examination of the hind limbs did not reveal any signs of
arthritis (
).
Figure 5
The course of Lyme borreliosis in uPAR knock-out mice on a B.
burgdorferi susceptible mixed C57BL/6×C3H/HeN
genetic background.
(A) Urokinase receptor deficient mice on the mixed genetic background
also display higher B. burgdorferi numbers compared to
WT littermate controls. C57BL/6 mice were backcrossed twice to a C3H/HeN
background. We intercrossed F2 mice and used the homozygous and
nullizygous offspring (F2 homozygous uPAR deficient
C57BL/6×C3H/HeN mice and WT littermate controls) for our
experiments. Mice were inoculated with B. burgdorferi
or sham and sacrificed two weeks post infection, DNA was extracted from
the indicated tissues and samples were subjected to quantitative
Borrelia flab and mouse
β-actin PCR. B. burgdorferi
numbers are depicted as described in Figure 2. Six to eight mice per group
were used. (B) Urokinase receptor deficient leukocytes from mice on the
mixed genetic background are not as capable of phagocytosing B.
burgdorferi as are granulocytes from WT littermate
controls. Phagocytosis assays with whole blood were performed as
described in Figure
2. Six to eight mice per group were used. (C, D and E) Peak
carditis in these uPAR −/− mice (D) is more severe
compared to carditis in WT littermate controls (C). Mice were inoculated
with B. burgdorferi and sacrificed two weeks post
infection. Pictures of hematoxylin and eosin stained sagittal sections
depict representative sections. Carditis was scored as described in
Figure 4 within
the same session (E). Six to eight mice per group were used. (F and G)
The main cell involved in murine Lyme carditis is the macrophage.
Representative pictures of F4/80 stained sagittal sections of hearts
from B. burgdorferi infected uPAR deficient mice (G)
and WT littermate controls (F). (H) More severe inflammation in
B. burgdorferi infected uPAR deficient animals
(n = 7) compared to WT littermate
controls (n = 7) as measured by
multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MPLA). MLPA was
performed on RNA obtained from half of sagittally dissected hearts from
B. burgdorferi or sham inoculated mice. Depicted
are mRNA expression of TNF-α,
CCL3, TLR2, CD14,
IL1-β, IRAK3,
ICAM1 and TBP
(housekeeping gene
[66]). Other genes included in the assay were
IL6, IL10,
INF-γ, TFPI,
F3, PROCR, SERPINE1P,
PLAT, PLAUR,
TLR4, TLR9 LY96,
IRAK1, F2R, NFKB1a,
NOS3, ITGA5,B2M,
ITGAV, ITGAB3,
TFRC, HIF1A, MMP2 and
HP. Bars represent the mean±SEM. A
p-value<0.05 was considered statistically
significant. * indicating p<0,05;
** p<0,01.
The course of Lyme borreliosis in uPAR knock-out mice on a B.
burgdorferi susceptible mixed C57BL/6×C3H/HeN
genetic background.
(A) Urokinase receptor deficient mice on the mixed genetic background
also display higher B. burgdorferi numbers compared to
WT littermate controls. C57BL/6 mice were backcrossed twice to a C3H/HeN
background. We intercrossed F2 mice and used the homozygous and
nullizygous offspring (F2 homozygous uPAR deficient
C57BL/6×C3H/HeN mice and WT littermate controls) for our
experiments. Mice were inoculated with B. burgdorferi
or sham and sacrificed two weeks post infection, DNA was extracted from
the indicated tissues and samples were subjected to quantitative
Borrelia flab and mouse
β-actin PCR. B. burgdorferi
numbers are depicted as described in Figure 2. Six to eight mice per group
were used. (B) Urokinase receptor deficient leukocytes from mice on the
mixed genetic background are not as capable of phagocytosing B.
burgdorferi as are granulocytes from WT littermate
controls. Phagocytosis assays with whole blood were performed as
described in Figure
2. Six to eight mice per group were used. (C, D and E) Peak
carditis in these uPAR −/− mice (D) is more severe
compared to carditis in WT littermate controls (C). Mice were inoculated
with B. burgdorferi and sacrificed two weeks post
infection. Pictures of hematoxylin and eosin stained sagittal sections
depict representative sections. Carditis was scored as described in
Figure 4 within
the same session (E). Six to eight mice per group were used. (F and G)
The main cell involved in murineLyme carditis is the macrophage.
Representative pictures of F4/80 stained sagittal sections of hearts
from B. burgdorferi infected uPAR deficient mice (G)
and WT littermate controls (F). (H) More severe inflammation in
B. burgdorferi infected uPAR deficient animals
(n = 7) compared to WT littermate
controls (n = 7) as measured by
multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MPLA). MLPA was
performed on RNA obtained from half of sagittally dissected hearts from
B. burgdorferi or sham inoculated mice. Depicted
are mRNA expression of TNF-α,
CCL3, TLR2, CD14,
IL1-β, IRAK3,
ICAM1 and TBP
(housekeeping gene
[66]). Other genes included in the assay were
IL6, IL10,
INF-γ, TFPI,
F3, PROCR, SERPINE1P,
PLAT, PLAUR,
TLR4, TLR9 LY96,
IRAK1, F2R, NFKB1a,
NOS3, ITGA5,B2M,
ITGAV, ITGAB3,
TFRC, HIF1A, MMP2 and
HP. Bars represent the mean±SEM. A
p-value<0.05 was considered statistically
significant. * indicating p<0,05;
** p<0,01.
Discussion
Since its discovery approximately 30 years ago Lyme borreliosis has become the most
important vector-borne disease in the Western world. We here demonstrate, to our
knowledge for the first time, that uPAR plays an important role in the antibacterial
innate immune response against B. burgdorferi. We show that uPAR
expression is upregulated in response to B. burgdorferi on human
and murine leukocytes both in vitro, as well in vivo. Importantly, we describe the
role of uPAR in the immune response against B. burgdorferi. By
using C57BL/6 WT and uPAR knock-out mice we show that uPAR plays an important role
in phagocytosis of B. burgdorferi - a prerequisite for the
eradication of the spirochete - by leukocytes. Moreover, experiments with C57BL/6
uPA, tPA and PAI-1 knock-out mice show that the mechanism by which uPAR is involved
in the phagocytosis of B. burgdorferi is independent of ligation to
uPA or uPAR's role in fibrinolysis. Finally, we show that, in mice
relatively susceptible to Borrelia infection - mice on a mixed
C57BL/6 and C3H/HeN background - uPARdeficiency also impaired phagocytotic capacity
in vitro, which was associated with higher B. burgdorferi numbers,
more local inflammation and more severe carditis, compared to WT littermate control
animals, further underscoring the in vivo relevance of our findings. Together these
data demonstrate an important role for uPAR in the innate immune response against,
and the clearance of, the causative agent of Lyme borreliosis.Earlier studies documented that membrane bound uPAR and uPAR mRNA are upregulated in
human peripheral blood-derived monocytes and the human monocyte-like cell line U937
upon exposure to viable and heat-killed B. burgdorferi
[12],[13]. We here show that viable B.
burgdorferi induces upregulation uPAR (
and
), not only on murine and human monocytes, but also on macrophages and
granulocytes in vitro. Notably, uPAR expression in response to B.
burgdorferi in vivo has never been investigated. We here show that in
skin from Lyme borreliosispatients with erythema migransuPAR mRNA expression is
significantly increased and could be readily detected by quantitative RT-PCR (
). Increased levels of uPAR are likely to be caused by influx of leukocytes
to the site of the tick-bite. Indeed, in preliminary experiments in which we
inoculated human skin ex vivo with viable B. burgdorferi - a model
in which there is no influx of leukocytes [32] - we did not observe an
increase in uPAR expression as determined by uPAR immunostaining on snap frozen
sagittal skin sections (data not shown). Erythema migrans lesions are characterized
by perivascular infiltrates in the dermis composed primarily of lymphocytes and
macrophages [33]. We do not know which infiltrating cell type is
responsible for the elevated uPAR levels, but based on our in vitro data we
speculate that the macrophage is the most likely candidate. Indeed, macrophages from
intraperitoneally B. burgdorferi-inoculated WT C57BL/6 mice did
upregulate uPAR expression, further indicating that
Borrelia-phagocyte interaction in vivo results in induction of uPAR
expression (
). Upregulation of uPAR appeared not to be specific for B.
burgdorferi since, in our in vitro experiments, other bacteria, i.e.
Klebsiella pneumoniae and Burkholderia
pseudomallei, also induce upregulation of uPAR to a similar extent (data
not shown).To investigate the role of uPAR in the immune response against B.
burgdorferi and the course of murineLyme borreliosis we inoculated C57BL/6
WT and uPAR knock-out mice with B. burgdorferi. We demonstrate by
quantitative PCR and culture that mice lacking uPAR display significantly increased
B. burgdorferi numbers in all tissue examined, indicative of a
more disseminated infection (
), although also in these mice there appeared to be clearance of B.
burgdorferi, as suggested by lower numbers 4 weeks compared to 2 weeks
post infection. The increased B. burgdorferi burden in uPAR
deficient mice was underscored by a more abundant, putatively reactive, IgG response
(
). The role of uPAR in leukocyte adhesion and migration, leading to
recruitment of these cells to the site of infection, has been the topic of
investigations for many years. Several in vivo studies show that migration of uPAR
deficient leukocytes is impaired in response to, for example, Pseudomonas
aeruginosum
[22] and
Streptococcus pneumoniae
[23].
In other studies, e.g. in E. coli-induced peritonitis [20] and
pyelonephritis [21] uPAR deficiency did not affect leukocyte
recruitment, indicating that the role of uPAR in migration of leukocytes is
dependent on the pathogen, the site of infection and the disease model.
Interestingly, in the mouse model for Lyme borreliosisuPAR is not crucially
involved in migration of leukocytes to B. burgdorferi infected
tissues, as indicated in our in vivo migration experiments (
). Strikingly, the fact that we observed more macrophages 32 hours after
injection with B. burgdorferi in uPAR knock-out skin compared to WT
controls, but no differences in H&E staining, suggests that the quality of
the inflammatory infiltrate is affected rather than the quantity; presumably due to
higher B. burgdorferi numbers in the uPAR knock-out mice.
Interestingly, recently it was shown that uPAR also facilitates phagocytosis of the
gram-negative bacterium E. coli by neutrophils [19],[21]. We
here show, by fluorescent microscopic assays, and FACS-based phagocytosis assays,
that both uPAR deficient granulocytes and macrophages are significantly less capable
of phagocytosing viable spirochetes (
and
and
). Importantly, uPAR deficiency did not affect binding of
the spirochete to the surface of leukocytes (
). In addition, in an in vitro killing assay uPAR appeared not to be involved
in killing of the spirochete following phagocytosis (data not shown), indicating
that uPAR is involved strictly in the process of internalization of B.
burgdorferi by leukocytes. Others have previously shown that
phagocytosis of spirochetes by immune cells can be crucial for adequate cytokine
induction and leukocyte activation [34]–[36]. We did not observe
defects in pro-inflammatory cytokine production in uPAR deficient leukocytes when
stimulated in vitro with B. burgdorferi. In contrast to the studies
described above our results describe more subtle differences in phagocytotic
capacity between WT and uPAR deficient leukocytes; we demonstrate diminished, but
not absent, phagocytosis in uPAR deficient macrophages compared to WT controls.The role of uPAR in phagocytosis of B. burgdorferi appeared to be
independent of uPA and uPAR's role in the fibrinolytic system, since in our
phagocytosis assays uPA, tPA and PAI-1 knock-out mice all displayed normal
phagocytotic capacity of the spirochete compared to WT mice (
and
). In addition, in vivo experiments clearly show that when these mice were
inoculated with B. burgdorferi and sacrificed two weeks post
infection, normal B. burgdorferi numbers were detected (
and
). There are numerous in vitro studies reporting that B.
burgdorferi interacts with the fibrinolytic system (reviewed in [6]).
Extrapolating these data to the in vivo situation, this interaction, mainly through
binding to host derived plasminogen, was thought to enable the spirochete to
penetrate tissues, the blood-brain barrier and migrate through the extracellular
matrix [8], [37]–[39]. Indeed, for the
spirochetal causative agent of relapsing fever, using plasminogen knock-out mice, it
has been clearly shown that plasminogen is required for dissemination of the
spirochete to the heart and brain in vivo [40]. To our knowledge, for
B. burgdorferi however, there is only one previously published
study that describes the effect of diminished fibrinolytic activity on the course of
B. burgdorferi infection in vivo [7]. In this study, in
which plasminogen deficient mice were used, plasminogen was shown to be important
for dissemination of the spirochete within the feeding tick. Strikingly, despite a
short-lived spirochetemia, there were no differences in B.
burgdorferi numbers in any of the tissues examined in plasminogen knock-out
compared to WT mice at several time points post infection [7]. In line with these
data, our results demonstrate that the fibrinolytic system per se does not affect
the course of B. burgdorferi infection. Strikingly, we here show
that one of the key players in the fibrinolytic system, uPAR, independently of
ligation to uPA or its presumptive role in fibrinolysis, is importantly involved in
the course of experimental murineLyme borreliosis.The fact that we show that the requirement of uPAR in phagocytosis of B.
burgdorferi is independent of uPA or uPAR's role in the
fibrinolytic system suggests that the requirement of uPAR in internalization of
Borrelia is dependent on interaction of uPAR with other cell
surface molecules. Indeed, uPAR has been shown to facilitate various leukocyte
functions, among which adhesion, migration and phagocytosis through interaction with
αβ-integrins and other cell surface molecules, but also vitronectin
[14],[15]. This implies a role for uPAR as a signaling
receptor. However, because uPAR is a glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol linked receptor
and lacks a cytosolic domain it needs to form functional transmembrane units with
other molecules, such as multiple αβ-integrins, G-protein-coupled
receptors, and caveolin in order to induce intracellular signaling events leading to
cytoskeleton rearrangements and consequent cell movement [14],[15]. Since both uPAR and
B. burgdorferi share many molecules with which they can
interact, for example αβ-integrins and vitronectin, it will be
challenging to identify the surface molecule with which uPAR associates to
facilitate phagocytosis of B. burgdorferi.When we infected uPAR knock-out mice on a mixed C57BL/6 and C3H/HeN background with
B. burgdorferi these mice exhibited higher B.
burgdorferi numbers in cardiac tissue two weeks post infection compared
to WT littermate controls, which was also associated with decreased phagocytosis of
B. burgdorferi. Strikingly, in these mice we observed a
significantly increased influx of leukocytes, predominantly macrophages, at the
atrioventricular junction and at the aortic root compared to WT littermate controls
(Figure 5), further
indicating that uPAR is not required for migration of leukocytes in response to
B. burgdorferi, which was also underscored by the in vitro
migration assays (
). Furthermore, our data indicate that, although the underlying mechanisms
appeared to be the same, the consequences of uPAR deficiency for the course of
murineLyme borreliosis are dependent on the genetic background of the host. Others
have shown that C57BL/6 and C3H/HeN mice harbor similar B.
burgdorferi numbers after infection, but the severity of symptoms was more
pronounced in C3H/HeN mice [30], indicating that the extent of the immune
response that is mounted against the spirochete is dependent on the genetic
background of the host. Indeed, we have demonstrated that uPAR deficiency in
Borrelia resistant C57BL/6 mice leads to higher B.
burgdorferi loads, but to comparable, albeit longer-lived active
carditis compared to WT controls. By contrast, uPAR deficient mice on a more
susceptible mixed C57BL/6×C3H/HeN background also exhibited higher
B. burgdorferi numbers, but more pronounced influx of
leukocytes and more severe carditis. Local cytokines and chemokines induced by
B. burgdorferi are thought to mediate Lyme carditis. A cytokine
that has been implicated to be of paramount importance for local inflammation and
migration of leukocytes is IL-1β [41]–[43]. Also
in B. burgdorferi infected mice and patients IL-1β has been
shown to be upregulated in heart or joints [44]–[47]
Interestingly, by MLPA we found significantly higher levels of mRNA coding for
IL-1β, IL-1 receptor associated kinase (IRAK)-3 (predominantly expressed in
macrophages) and TLR2 (the TLR preferentially recognizing B.
burgdorferi lipoproteins) in hearts from B. burgdorferi
infected uPAR knock-out mice on the mixed genetic background compared to WT
littermate controls (
). Interestingly, in previous studies we showed that (human) peripheral
blood-derived dendritic cells stimulated with the TLR2 ligand lipoteichoic acid
(LTA) or viable B. burgdorferi produced high levels of
IL-1β [48]. One could argue against the use of F2 mice in
our studies, however the fact that F1 WT C57BL/6×WT C3H/HeN mice are
already intermediate susceptible to Borrelia infection [30], encouraged
us to perform our experiments with F2 mice.Together, our data suggest that decreased phagocytosis of B.
burgdorferi by uPAR deficient leukocytes (
,
and
) resulted in higher local and systemic B. burgdorferi
numbers, apparent in later stages post inoculation (
and
). Early in infection increased Borrelia numbers might
enhance local skin innate immune responses in uPAR knock-out mice resulting in
significantly more influx of phagocytes, as shown by in vivo and in vitro migration
assays (
and
). The increased influx of phagocytes might temporarily compensate for the
impaired phagocytosis in uPAR deficient leukocytes and temporarily control
dissemination of Borrelia. However, as shown by our in vivo data,
in uPAR knock-out mice, B. burgdorferi will eventually manage to
disseminate resulting in increased B. burgdorferi numbers in
distant organs during later stages of infection compared to WT animals (
and
). In uPAR knock-out mice on the more susceptible genetic background, these
higher Borrelia numbers were associated with an increased influx of
leukocytes, as demonstrated by pathology of mouse hearts (Figure 5). Since, uPAR deficient leukocytes are
as capable as WT leukocytes in producing pro-inflammatory cytokines upon exposure to
B. burgdorferi (Figure 2), this could explain the increased inflammation and tissue
damage observed in these mice compared to WT controls (Figure 5). Therefore, we postulate that in WT
mice, upon B. burgdorferi infection, leukocytes upregulate uPAR
(Figure 1 and Figure S1), which facilitates
phagocytosis of the spirochete, reducing the number of disseminating spirochetes and
thereby limiting the extent and severity of inflammation of distant sites, such as
the heart. In conclusion, we here show that uPAR is importantly involved in the host
defense against B. burgdorferi in vivo by a mechanism that is
independent of binding of uPAR to uPA or its role in the fibrinolytic system.
Materials and Methods
Mice, spirochetes and infection
Specific pathogen-free wildtype C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Harlan Sprague
Dawley Inc. (Horst, The Netherlands) and uPAR knock-out C57BL/6 mice were
purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME) [49]. In addition
C57BL/6 uPAR knock-out mice were backcrossed twice to a C3H/HeN - purchased from
Jackson Laboratories – background, generating F2
C57BL/6×C3H/HeN heterozygous uPAR deficient mice. F2 mice were crossed
among each other to generate homozygous C3H/HeN×C57BL/6 uPAR knock-out
mice and WT littermate controls. uPA, tPA and PAI-1 knock-out mice were also
purchased from Jackson Laboratories. All mice were bred in the animal facility
of the Academic Medical Center (Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Age-and sex-matched
animals were used in each experiment and the Animal Care and Use Committee of
the University of Amsterdam approved all experiments. Six to eight-week old mice
were infected by intradermal syringe inoculation with 1×106
B. burgdorferi sensu stricto strain B31 clone 5A11 [50],
that had previously been recovered from an experimentally infected mouse [29].
Spirochetes were cultured in BSK-II medium, enumerated and inoculated in the
midline of the back or with BSK-II medium as a control (SHAM), as described
previously [29],[51]. Mice were
sacrificed by bleeding from the inferior vena cava at the indicated time points,
i.e. 2, 4 (or 6 weeks) post infection. Heparin or citrate plasma was stored at
−20°C for future use. Skin (inoculation site), urinary
bladder, heart and tibiotarsi were saved for histopathological examination,
culture or quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (q-PCR).
Q-PCR
DNA from murine tissues was obtained with the DNeasy KIT (Qiagen, Venlo, The
Netherlands) as previously described [29]. Quantitative PCR
detecting Borrelia flaB and mouse
β-actin was performed, as described previously [29].
Standards consisted of dilutions of genomic DNA from B.
burgdorferi or mouse ß-actin (252 bp) cloned
into the PCR2.1-TOPO vector (Invitrogen, Breda, The Netherlands), as described
previously [29],[51]
Arthritis, paw swelling and radiological examination
Histopathological changes in tibiotarsi were assessed as previously described
[29],[52]. We monitored ankle
swelling of both tibiotarsal joints using a Mitutoyo pressure controlled
microcaliper (Mitutoyo, Kanagawa, Japan). Measurements were performed several
times throughout the course of the infection by the same observer blinded to the
experimental design. Lastly, we performed post mortem radiological examination
of formalin fixed right hind paws, as described previously [53].
Carditis
Five µm-thick paraffin embedded sections of sagittally dissected hearts
were processed and H&E stained by routine histological techniques.
Carditis was scored on a scale from 0 to 3 by a pathologist blinded to the
experimental design, essentially as previously described [27],[28],[51], with 0: no
carditis; 1: mild carditis; 2: moderate carditis and 3: severe carditis. As
described previously [26], 2 weeks post infection, carditis was
characterized by disperse inflammation at the atrioventricular junction and
aortic root, where as four weeks post infection, organizing inflammation was
characterized by the presence of sharply delineated foci of >50
mononuclear cells in the atrial walls. An F4/80 immunostaining (BMA Biomedicals,
Augst, Switzerland) was performed to detect influx of macrophages [54].
Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
MLPA was performed in essence as described before [55]. The genes that
were analyzed are listed in the figure legend for
. Equal amounts of mRNA were included per reaction and all samples were
tested in a single experiment using the same batch of reagents. The levels of
mRNA for each gene were expressed as a normalized ratio of the peak area of the
fluorescent intensity (in arbitrary units) and divided by the cumulative peak
area of all genes in the assay, resulting in the relative abundances of mRNAs of
the genes of interest [56].
Whole cell B. burgdorferi ELISA
Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto strain B31 specific total
immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgG subclasses were measured in heparin plasma from
infected animals and controls by ELISA as described previously [29].
All measurements were performed in duplicate.
Amidolytic assays of PA activity
Plasminogen activator (PA) activity was measured as a measure for the activity of
the fibrinolytic system using an amidolytic assay as described earlier [23],[57]. Briefly,
citrate plasma was incubated with S-2251 (Chromogenix, Mölndal,
Sweden), plasminogen and cyanogen bromide fragments of fibrinogen (Chromogenix,
Milano, Italy). Conversion of plasminogen to plasmin was assessed by subsequent
conversion of the chromogenic substrate S-2251 and was detected with a
spectrophotometer.
Stimulation assays
Whole blood and peritoneal macrophages from three naive uPAR knock-out or WT mice
were harvested as described [58]. Briefly, 1×105 adherent
macrophages and heparinized whole blood were stimulated in duplo in 96-well
microtiter plates (Greiner) with 1×106 or
1×107 viable B. burgdorferi suspended
in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium or medium as a negative
control for 16 h. Supernatants were collected and stored at
−20°C until cytokine production was measured by CBA. For
assessment of uPAR expression by fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS),
cells were harvested and stained with murine anti-CD87-Phycoerythrin (PE) (BD
Pharmingen, Maarssen, The Netherlands). To assess uPAR expression on specific
cells, cells were double-stained with anti-GR1-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)
(BD Pharmingen) (granulocytes) or F4/80-allophycocyanin (APC) (BD Pharmingen)
(monocytes and macrophages). In addition, in non-phagocytosing cells, i.e.
CD4+ and CD8+ T cells - stained with
anti-CD3-APC (BD Pharmingen) and anti-CD4-FITC or anti-CD8-PerCP respectively
(BD Pharmingen) - we also assessed uPAR expression by FACS analysis. Similarly,
uPAR expression on human cells derived from heparinized whole blood was analyzed
with a humanbiotin-labeled antibody against uPAR (R&D Systems,
Minneapolis, MN) in combination with streptavidin conjugated to PE; cells were
triple-stained with also anti-CD15-APC (BD Pharmingen) (granulocytes) and
anti-CD14-Cy-Chrome 5 (Cy5) (BD Pharmigen) (monocytes) (BD Pharmingen). Human
macrophages were generated as described previously [59]. Briefly, human
peripheral blood derived mononuclear cells were isolated from buffy coats by
centrifugation over a Ficoll-Paque gradient. Subsequently, adherent monocytes
were cultured in X-VIVO medium (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) with
1% heat-inactivated autologous plasma to allow for differentiation to
human monocyte-derived macrophages in 7 days. Antibodies were used in
concentrations recommended by the manufacturer and FACS analysis was performed
using the BD FACScalibur (BD Biosciences, Breda, The Netherlands). Endotoxin
concentration in the B. burgdorferi culture media was
approximately 1 IU/ml, as determined by a Cambrex QCL LAL assay (Cambrex). We
established that the maximal amount of LPS that could have possibly contaminated
the final Borrelia preparation used for the in vitro
stimulations - after extensive washing and resuspension in different cell
culture media - was insufficient to influence uPAR expression (data not shown).
In a separate experiment viable B. burgdorferi
(1×108) were injected into the peritoneal cavity of
C57BL/6 WT or uPAR knock-out mice for one hour. Hereafter cells were harvested,
stained for F4/80, and CD87 (uPAR) expression was measured by FACS analysis.
Detection of uPAR mRNA expression in human samples
Transcutaneous skin biopsies were collected from healthy volunteers, i.e.
non-inflammed skin, or patients with active Lyme erythema migrans at the
Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands and New York Medical
College, NY. IRB approval was obtained from both institutes. All Lyme patient
skin samples were tested positive for B. burgdorferi
spirochetes by in vitro culture and PCR. Skin samples were frozen-ground to fine
powder using a china grinder and RNA was extracted using the TRIZOL reagent from
Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, U.S.A). RNA samples were treated with TURBO DNase
(Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, U.S.A) to remove DNA contaminants. RNA was
then converted to cDNA using an Affinity Script kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA,
U.S.A). Quantification of uPAR was performed by Taqman PCR (Applied Biosystems)
and normalized to β-actin (ACTB). The primers and
probes used for uPAR were forward 5′AATCCTGGAGCTTTGAAAATCT 3′, reverse
5′CCACTTTTAGTACAGCAGGAGA
3′, and probe 5′6FAM-ACTGCCGAGGCCCCATGAATC 3′-TAMRA.
Human β-actin primers and probe were inventoried products of Applied
Biosystems.
Phagocytosis assays
Phagocytosis assays were performed in essence as described before [60]–[62]. Viable B.
burgdorferi were labeled with carboxyfluorescein diacetate
succinimidyl ester (CFSE, Invitrogen) as described by others [63] or heat-inactivated (30 min at 56°C)
non-motile, but intact, B. burgdorferi were labeled with
fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC). Adhered peritoneal macrophages (derived from
6–8 mice per group) were incubated with CFSE-labeled B.
burgdorferi
(Cell∶Borrelia = 1∶50)
in serum-free RPMI 1640 medium in 24-well microtiter plates (Greiner, Alphen a/d
Rijn, The Netherlands) for 0, 15 and 60 minutes at 37°C. Phagocytosis
was stopped by transferring the cells to 4°C. Extracellular signal of
B. burgdorferi was eliminated by addition of a quenching
solution for one minute - containing Trypan blue that absorbs the fluorescence
emission of both FITC and CFSE (Orpegen, Groningen, The Netherlands; [62].) -
and three washes with ice-cold PBS. For each sample and each time point
4°C controls were performed, however there was hardly any phagocytosis
detectable under these conditions (data not shown). Cells were resuspended in
FACS buffer (PBS supplemented with 0,5% bovine serum albumin (BSA),
0,01% NaN3 and 0,35 mM EDTA) followed by FACS analysis. At
37°C the majority of spirochetes was internalized as was determined by
control experiments in which we did not add the quenching solution (data not
shown). Similarly, to determine neutrophil phagocytosis capacity, 50
µl of whole blood was incubated with 2×106 viable
CFSE-labeled B. burgdorferi for the indicated time, after which
quenching solution was added for one minute and samples were washed twice with
ice-cold FACS buffer. Thereafter cells were incubated with BD Lyse/Fix solution
(BD Biosciences) and neutrophils were labeled using anti-Gr-1-PE (BD
Pharmingen). Live cells were electronically gated and phagocytosis was
determined using FACS. The phagocytosis index of each sample was calculated as
previously, described: (mean fluorescence intensity (MFI)×percentage
(%) positive cells) at 37°C minus (MFI×%
positive cells) at 4°C [64],[65].
Migration assays
In vitro migration experiments with murine peritoneal macrophages from WT and
uPAR knock-out mice were performed essentially as described [64],[65]. Prior to
experimentation cells were labeled with CellTracker Green (Molecular Probes,
Eugene, Or) in serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
(DMEM). The dye was fixed by 1 h incubation in DMEM plus 10% FCS.
Thereafter cells were washed and resuspended in serum-free medium and
transferred to 3 µM pore size HTS FluoroBlok Cell Culture Inserts (BD
Falcon) which were inserted in fitting 24-well plates containing various
attractants (B. burgdorferi, activated complement factor 5
(C5a)) also in DMEM serum-free medium. Fluorescence, representing the number of
cells on the bottom side of the insert, was read every 2 min on a Series 4000
CytoFluor Multi-Well Plate Reader (Perseptive Biosystems, Framingham, MA). Raw
fluorescence data were corrected for background fluorescence and no-attractants
controls were subtracted at each measured time point to correct for random
migration. Migration start points were set to zero. To mimic the in vivo
situation more closely we also performed experiments with an embryonic rodent
heart-derived cell line, H9c2 cells (CRL-1446, American Type Culture Collection,
Queens Road, Teddington, UK). These cardiomyoblasts were maintained in DMEM with
10% foetal bovine serum (FBS). Prior to experimentation, cells were
washed and resuspended in serum-free DMEM and incubated with viable
Borrelia
(Cell∶Borrelia = 1∶50)
or medium as a control for 16 h. The supernatants were centrifuged for 5 minutes
at 1200×g to remove cells and other particles,
followed by centrifugation at 4000×g for 15 minute to
remove the spirochetes. Supernatants were used undiluted or diluted (data not
shown) as chemoattractants in the indicated experiments. All experiments were
performed in duplo or in triplo and repeated three times. In addition, we also
assessed migration of leukocytes in skin from C57BL/6 WT and uPAR deficient mice
in response to B. burgdorferi in vivo
(n = 5 per group). In these set of experiments
we intradermally injected C57BL/6 WT mice with 1×106
B. burgdorferi in PBS in the midline of the neck and mice were
sacrificed 0, 6 or 32 hours post inoculation. Control animals were injected with
PBS. Skin was harvested, formalin fixed and imbedded in paraffin. Five
µm-thick sagittal skin sections were processed and H&E, Ly6G
and F4/80 stained by routine histological techniques [54]. The control
animals did no display influx of leukocytes (data not shown). Slides were scored
for influx of leukocytes by an independent pathologist who was blinded to the
experimental design. Influx was semi-quantitatively scored on a scale from
0–3, with 0 being no, 1 mild, 2 moderate, and 3 being severe diffuse
infiltration.
Statistical analysis
Differences between the groups were analyzed using the two-sided non-parametric
Mann-Whitney U test (Graphpad Prism Software version 4.0, San Diego, CA). Where
indicated a two-sided Chi-square indicated was applied. Data are presented as
the mean±standard errors of the mean (SEM). A p
value of<0.05 was considered significant, where * indicated
p<0,05, **
p<0,01 and ***
p<0,001. For ECG data statistical analysis was performed using a
multivariate repeated measurements model (SPSS statistics software 17.0).Borrelia burgdorferi induces upregulation of the urokinase
receptor on leukocytes in vitro and in vivo. (A) Viable B.
burgdorferi induces uPAR expression on ex vivo generated human
macrophages. Cells were incubated with viable B.
burgdorferi for 16 hours. Thereafter cells were stained with
anti-CD87 (uPAR), electronically gated and analyzed by FACS analysis.
Representative cytograms and histograms are shown. (B) Viable B.
burgdorferi induces uPAR expression on murine granulocytes.
Whole blood was incubated with viable B. burgdorferi for 16
hours. Erythrocytes were lysed, cells were co-stained with anti-GR-1 and
anti-CD87 (uPAR), electronically gated and analyzed by FACS analysis.
Representative cytograms and histograms are shown. (C) Viable B.
burgdorferi (1×108) were injected into the
peritoneal cavity of C57BL/6 WT (n = 6) or
uPAR knock-out (n = 4) mice for one hour.
Hereafter cells were harvested, stained for F4/80, and CD87 (uPAR)
expression was measured by FACS analysis. A
p-value<0,05 was considered statistically
significant. * indicating p<0,05;
** p<0,01. (D) In non-phagocytosing
cells, i.e. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells -
doublestained with anti-CD3-APC (BD Pharmingen) and anti-CD4-FITC and
anti-CD8-PerCP, respectively - we also assessed CD87 (uPAR) expression upon
stimulation with B. burgdorferi by FACS analysis. Error
bars represent the mean of triplicates within one experiment±SEM.(0.81 MB JPG)Click here for additional data file.Impaired phagocytosis of B. burgdorferi by uPAR deficient
leukocytes. (A and B) Representative cytograms (A) and histograms from
phagocytosis assays of B. burgdorferi by WT and uPAR
deficient whole blood in time (B). Assays were performed as described in
. After the assays whole blood was lysed and stained with anti-GR-1
(granulocytes). Marker (M)1 encompasses positive cells.(0.73 MB JPG)Click here for additional data file.Confocal microscopy of B. burgdorferi phagocytosis. (A and
B) Confocal microscopy confirmed that B. burgdorferi in in
vitro phagocytosis assays were localized intracellularly. Cells incubated
with CFSE-labeled B. burgdorferi were subjected to confocal
microscopy. Nuclei of cells were stained with DAPI. In Panel (A) we depicted
the widest transversal section of a segmented nucleus of a granulocyte
stained with DAPI and a CFSE-labeled B. burgdorferi
spirochete. Superimposing the brightfield image confirms the bacterium is
localized intracellularly. Panel (B) shows another granulocyte and
B. burgdorferi from different view points (left panel)
and a stack movie (right panel) further verifying that we are assessing
internalized bacteria in the in vitro phagocytosis assays. Note: The Figure S3 Powerpoint file
should be saved in the same folder as the AVI file in order view the figure
correctly. In addition, open the Powerpoint file in slideshow format.(0.80 MB ZIP)Click here for additional data file.Carditis in WT, uPAR, uPA, tPA and PAI-1 knock-out mice. (A and B) Peak
carditis in C57BL/6 uPAR −/− is of similar severity
compared to WT controls, although active carditis persists longer in uPAR
−/− mice. WT and uPAR −/− mice were
inoculated with B. burgdorferi and sacrificed two or four
week post infection. Sagittal sections of formalin fixed and paraffin
embedded hearts were H&E stained. The severity two weeks post
infection was scored by a pathologist blinded to the experimental design on
a scale of 0–3, with 0: no carditis; 1: mild carditis; 2: moderate
carditis and 3: severe carditis. Sham inoculated mice did not develop
carditis (data not shown). Pictures depict representative sections. (C and
D) Peak carditis in C57BL/6 uPA, tPA and PAI-1 knock-out mice is comparable
to peak carditis in WT C57BL/6 mice infected with B.
burgdorferi. Carditis was scored as described above. Six to eight
mice per group were used and bars represent the mean±SEM. A
p-value<0,05 was considered statistically
significant.(1.19 MB JPG)Click here for additional data file.Migration and arthritis in WT and uPAR knock-out mice on a B.
burgdorferi susceptible genetic background. (A, B and C)
Urokinase receptor deficient macrophages from mice on the mixed genetic
background can migrate to cardiogenic stimuli just as well as macrophages
from WT littermate controls. Migration of CellTracker Green labeled WT or
uPAR deficient macrophages towards several chemotactic stimuli was
investigated in vitro (A). As chemotactic stimuli we used B.
burgdorferi or activated complement factor 5 (C5a) (B) and
supernatant from the cardiomyoblastic rodent cell line H9c2 stimulated with
B. burgdorferi or control medium for 16 hours prior to
experimentation (C). All conditions were tested in duplo, in serum free DMEM
medium without the addition of antibiotics, and migration was corrected for
the no-attractant control. Graphs represent the mean of three independent
experiments±SEM. The fluorescent signal in the lower chamber
(indicative of migration) was measured in real time every two minutes
(cycli). (D and E) Only edema, no arthritis in B.
burgdorferi infected uPAR knock-out mice
(n = 7) and B. burgdorferi
infected WT littermate controls (n = 8).
Ankle swelling was measured using a microcaliper during the course of
B. burgdorferi infection (D). In this particular
experiment mice were monitored for three weeks. Post mortem, but before
decalcification, radiological examination of the right hindlimb was
performed (E). No differences between sham inoculated and B.
burgdorferi infected animals were observed. A
p-value<0,05 was considered statistically
significant. * indicating p<0,05.(0.47 MB JPG)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Meagan W Moore; Adriana R Cruz; Carson J LaVake; Amanda L Marzo; Christian H Eggers; Juan C Salazar; Justin D Radolf Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2007-01-12 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Joppe W R Hovius; Xin Li; Nandhini Ramamoorthi; Alje P van Dam; Stephen W Barthold; Tom van der Poll; Peter Speelman; Erol Fikrig Journal: FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol Date: 2007-03
Authors: Maarten F Bijlsma; Keren S Borensztajn; Henk Roelink; Maikel P Peppelenbosch; C Arnold Spek Journal: Cell Signal Date: 2007-08-24 Impact factor: 4.315
Authors: Sjoukje H Slofstra; Maarten F Bijlsma; Angelique P Groot; Pieter H Reitsma; Theo Lindhout; Hugo ten Cate; C Arnold Spek Journal: Blood Date: 2007-07-19 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Sander W Tas; Margriet J Vervoordeldonk; Najat Hajji; Michael J May; Sankar Ghosh; Paul P Tak Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2006 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: W Joost Wiersinga; Catharina W Wieland; Mark C Dessing; Narisara Chantratita; Allen C Cheng; Direk Limmathurotsakul; Wirongrong Chierakul; Masja Leendertse; Sandrine Florquin; Alex F de Vos; Nicholas White; Arjen M Dondorp; Nicholas P Day; Sharon J Peacock; Tom van der Poll Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2007-07-31 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Aizhen Yang; Jihong Dai; Zhanli Xie; Robert W Colman; Qingyu Wu; Raymond B Birge; Yi Wu Journal: J Immunol Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Ashley L Marcinkiewicz; Alan P Dupuis; Maxime Zamba-Campero; Nancy Nowak; Peter Kraiczy; Sanjay Ram; Laura D Kramer; Yi-Pin Lin Journal: Cell Microbiol Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 3.715
Authors: Justin T Schwartz; Jason H Barker; Matthew E Long; Justin Kaufman; Jenna McCracken; Lee-Ann H Allen Journal: J Immunol Date: 2012-08-10 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Michael W Curtis; Beth L Hahn; Kai Zhang; Chunhao Li; Richard T Robinson; Jenifer Coburn Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2018-01-22 Impact factor: 3.441