BACKGROUND AND AIM: We evaluated the diagnostic performance of an ELISA test for anti-gliadin IgA and IgG antibodies, which uses synthetic deamidated gliadin peptides (anti-gliadin antibodies, AGAs) as coating; the results were compared with a test that uses extracted gliadin (AGAe). METHODS: The study was conducted on the sera of 144 patients suffering from celiac disease (CD), including 20 patients with IgA deficiency and 9 who were following a gluten-free diet (GFD), and 129 controls. RESULTS: In the 115 CD patients (without IgA deficiency), the sensitivity of AGAe IgA and IgG was 32.2 and 60.9%, whereas that of AGAs IgA and IgG was 59.1 and 72.2%. The specificity for AGAe IgA and IgG, and AGAs IgA and IgG was 93.8 and 89.9%, and 96.9% and 99.2%, respectively. Of the 20 patients with CD and IgA deficiency, 7 tested positive for AGAe IgG and 14 for AGAs IgG. The test using deamidated gliadin peptides performed better in terms of sensitivity and specificity than the AGA tests with extracted antigen. CONCLUSIONS: The very high specificity of the AGAs IgG test (99.2%) also suggests that patients who test positive with this assay require a thorough followup, even if the anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (anti-tTG) and anti-endomysial autoantibodies (EMA) assays are negative. Copyright 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: We evaluated the diagnostic performance of an ELISA test for anti-gliadin IgA and IgG antibodies, which uses synthetic deamidated gliadin peptides (anti-gliadin antibodies, AGAs) as coating; the results were compared with a test that uses extracted gliadin (AGAe). METHODS: The study was conducted on the sera of 144 patients suffering from celiac disease (CD), including 20 patients with IgA deficiency and 9 who were following a gluten-free diet (GFD), and 129 controls. RESULTS: In the 115 CDpatients (without IgA deficiency), the sensitivity of AGAe IgA and IgG was 32.2 and 60.9%, whereas that of AGAs IgA and IgG was 59.1 and 72.2%. The specificity for AGAe IgA and IgG, and AGAs IgA and IgG was 93.8 and 89.9%, and 96.9% and 99.2%, respectively. Of the 20 patients with CD and IgA deficiency, 7 tested positive for AGAe IgG and 14 for AGAs IgG. The test using deamidated gliadin peptides performed better in terms of sensitivity and specificity than the AGA tests with extracted antigen. CONCLUSIONS: The very high specificity of the AGAs IgG test (99.2%) also suggests that patients who test positive with this assay require a thorough followup, even if the anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (anti-tTG) and anti-endomysial autoantibodies (EMA) assays are negative. Copyright 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: C Catassi; I M Rätsch; E Fabiani; M Rossini; F Bordicchia; F Candela; G V Coppa; P L Giorgi Journal: Lancet Date: 1994-01-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Edward J Hoffenberg; Todd MacKenzie; Katherine J Barriga; George S Eisenbarth; Fei Bao; Joel E Haas; Henry Erlich; T l Bugawan Tl; Ronald J Sokol; Iman Taki; Jill M Norris; Marian Rewers Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: H Arentz-Hansen; R Körner; O Molberg; H Quarsten; W Vader; Y M Kooy; K E Lundin; F Koning; P Roepstorff; L M Sollid; S N McAdam Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2000-02-21 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Ning Wang; Lennart Truedsson; Kerstin Elvin; Bengt A Andersson; Johan Rönnelid; Lucia Mincheva-Nilsson; Annica Lindkvist; Jonas F Ludvigsson; Lennart Hammarström; Charlotte Dahle Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-07 Impact factor: 3.240