Literature DB >> 8642204

Evaluation of six anti-gliadin antibody assays.

R Berger1, G Schmidt.   

Abstract

Two in-house methods developed in gastroenterological laboratories for the detection and quantitation of IgG and IgA antibodies to gliadin (AGA) were compared with three commercially available ELISAs (gluten IgG/IgA EIA, Kabi Pharmacia, Sweden; alpha-Gliatest, Eurospital, Italy; AGA Orkit, Labodia, Switzerland) and one qualitative rapid assay (Gliastick, Eurospital, Italy). 67 acute, biopsy confirmed coeliac disease cases were compared with 54 biopsy confirmed disease controls. The result of anti-endomysium antibody (AEA) testing was available from all cases. The testing of 121 sera in different test systems permitted comparison of the range of concentration and sensitivity of the quantitative IgG and IgA anti-gliadin tests. Each test uses its own arbitrary calibration. To permit direct comparison of the different test ranges the values of the different positive reference sera were converted into Pharmacia arbitrary units (AU). The AGA and IgG tests ranged from 0 to a maximum of 157-430 AU and the maximum IgA test results from 81 to 855 AU. This illustrates the need for an internationally accepted standard. All three EIA kits met the performance claims of the manufacturers and were easy to use. Most results agreed with the clinical diagnosis when the sera were positive for anti-endomysium antibodies. However, AEA negative specimens showed a considerable incidence of positive AGA in non-coeliacs. The study emphasises the need to test for both AGA and AEA in order to reliably diagnose coeliac disease. The qualitative test showed a high degree of false positive results and could be used to monitor the dietary compliance of coeliac patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8642204     DOI: 10.1016/0022-1759(96)00019-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol Methods        ISSN: 0022-1759            Impact factor:   2.303


  3 in total

1.  Usefulness of antibodies to deamidated gliadin peptides in celiac disease diagnosis and follow-up.

Authors:  Umberto Volta; Alessandro Granito; Erica Fiorini; Claudia Parisi; Maria Piscaglia; Georgios Pappas; Paolo Muratori; Francesco B Bianchi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Diagnostic efficacy of the ELISA test for the detection of deamidated anti-gliadin peptide antibodies in the diagnosis and monitoring of celiac disease.

Authors:  Elio Tonutti; Daniela Visentini; Alessia Picierno; Nicola Bizzaro; Danilo Villalta; Renato Tozzoli; Graziano Kodermaz; Antonio Carroccio; Giuseppe Iacono; Saverio Teresi; Stella Maria La Chiusa; Ignazio Brusca
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Atypical celiac disease: from recognizing to managing.

Authors:  B Admou; L Essaadouni; K Krati; K Zaher; M Sbihi; L Chabaa; B Belaabidia; A Alaoui-Yazidi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 2.260

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.