Literature DB >> 19455421

Does cholecystectomy status influence the common bile duct diameter? A matched-pair analysis.

Saurabh Chawla1, William E Trick, Susan Gilkey, Bashar M Attar.   

Abstract

The common bile duct (CBD) diameter is one factor that clinicians use when deciding on invasive evaluation for intra-ductal pathology, e.g., endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Previous studies and gastrointestinal and radiological textbook authors report disparate interpretations. These inconsistent interpretations likely result from methodological limitations in prior studies. The purpose of this work is to primarily compare the CBD diameter among patients with and without prior cholecystectomy and secondarily to compare proximal and distal CBD measurements. Among 40 matched pairs, post-cholecystectomy patients had larger mean CBD diameters at proximal (7.0 vs. 5.4 mm; P < 0.001) and distal (5.9 vs. 4.6 mm; P < 0.001) sites. Post-cholecystectomy patients were also more likely to exceed the 6-mm cut point for proximal (80 vs. 28%; P < 0.001) or distal (58 vs. 20%; P = 0.003) measurements. Incidental radiographic detection of enlarged CBDs among post-cholecystectomy patients is common; therefore, clinicians should use clinical determinants to guide decisions about additional costly or potentially harmful evaluation for intraductal pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19455421     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-009-0836-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  15 in total

1.  Common bile duct measurements in an elderly population.

Authors:  R S Perret; G D Sloop; J A Borne
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Development of a clinical data warehouse for hospital infection control.

Authors:  Mary F Wisniewski; Piotr Kieszkowski; Brandon M Zagorski; William E Trick; Michael Sommers; Robert A Weinstein
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-06-04       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  The influence of cholecystectomy on the normal common bile duct.

Authors:  C F QVIST
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1957-05-31

4.  Dilated bile duct in patients receiving narcotic substitution: an early report.

Authors:  H Zylberberg; H Fontaine; J M Corréas; F Carnot; C Bréchot; S Pol
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.062

5.  Does the common bile duct dilate after cholecystectomy? Sonographic evaluation in 234 patients.

Authors:  B Feng; Q Song
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  The size of the normal common hepatic duct following cholecystectomy: an ultrasonographic study.

Authors:  M F Graham; P L Cooperberg; M M Cohen; H J Burhenne
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  The preoperatively normal bile duct does not dilate after cholecystectomy: results of a five year study.

Authors:  A W Majeed; B Ross; A G Johnson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Effect of aging on the adult extrahepatic bile duct: a sonographic study.

Authors:  Gil N Bachar; Maya Cohen; Alexander Belenky; Eli Atar; Shafir Gideon
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  A prospective study on the value of ultrasound, computed tomography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of unjaundiced cholestasis.

Authors:  P A Pasanen; K Partanen; P Pikkarainen; E Alhava; A Pirinen; E Janatuinen
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  Extrahepatic bile ducts in healthy subjects, in patients with cholelithiasis, and in postcholecystectomy patients: a prospective ultrasonic study.

Authors:  C Niederau; J Müller; A Sonnenberg; T Scholten; J Erckenbrecht; W P Fritsch; T Brüster; G Strohmeyer
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 0.910

View more
  5 in total

1.  Clinical significance and long-term outcome of incidentally found bile duct dilatation.

Authors:  Jaryong Jeon; Song Yi Song; Kyu Taek Lee; Kwang Hyuck Lee; Mun Hee Bae; Jong Kyun Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Endoscopic ultrasound in common bile duct dilatation with normal liver enzymes.

Authors:  Claudio De Angelis; Milena Marietti; Mauro Bruno; Rinaldo Pellicano; Mario Rizzetto
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-07-10

3.  Effects of age and cholecystectomy on common bile duct diameter as measured by endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  Fabiana Benjaminov; George Leichtman; Timna Naftali; Elizabeth E Half; Fred M Konikoff
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Common bile duct dilatation after cholecystectomy: a one-year prospective study.

Authors:  Seon Mee Park; Woo Seok Kim; Il-Hun Bae; Ji Hoon Kim; Dong Hee Ryu; Lee-Chan Jang; Jae-Woon Choi
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2012-07-25

5.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for pediatric choledocholithiasis: Assessing the need for endoscopic intervention.

Authors:  Douglas S Fishman; Bruno P Chumpitazi; Isaac Raijman; Cynthia Man-Wai Tsai; E O'Brian Smith; Mark V Mazziotti; Mark A Gilger
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-06-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.