Literature DB >> 14510259

Effect of aging on the adult extrahepatic bile duct: a sonographic study.

Gil N Bachar1, Maya Cohen, Alexander Belenky, Eli Atar, Shafir Gideon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the size of the extrahepatic bile duct increases with age in adults.
METHODS: We prospectively collected data on 251 patients aged 20 years or older who underwent abdominal sonography. None of the patients had a history of liver, gallbladder, biliary, or pancreatic disease or surgery. The extrahepatic bile duct was measured at 3 locations: in the porta hepatis, in the most distal aspect of the head of the pancreas, and midway between these points. Least squares linear regression was used to correlate patient age and the size of the extrahepatic bile duct.
RESULTS: There were 126 men and 125 women aged 20 to 94 years (mean +/- SD, 52.5 +/- 17.63 years). Twelve percent of the study population were younger than 30 years, and 12% were older than 80 years. The mean diameters of the common bile duct in the 3 locations were as follows: proximal, 3.39 +/- 1.14 mm; middle, 3.72 +/- 1.28 mm; and distal, 4.28 +/- 1.18 mm. The overall mean for all measures was 3.66 +/- 1.15 mm. The width of the common bile duct ranged from 1.0 to 8.6 mm. There was a significant correlation between common bile duct size and age (r = 0.535; P < .001). Mean common bile duct sizes were 3.128 +/- 0.862 mm in the patients younger than 50 years and 4.19 +/- 1.15 mm in the patients older than 50 years (P < .001 by independent t test for equality of means). We have found that the duct gradually dilated 0.04 mm/y.
CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed an age-dependent change in the diameter of the extrahepatic bile duct. We suggest that the upper normal limit of the duct in elderly persons be set at 8.5 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14510259     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2003.22.9.879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  22 in total

1.  Does cholecystectomy status influence the common bile duct diameter? A matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Saurabh Chawla; William E Trick; Susan Gilkey; Bashar M Attar
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Non-invasive assessment of choledocholithiasis in patients with gallstones and abnormal liver function.

Authors:  Bilal O Al-Jiffry; Abdeen Elfateh; Tariq Chundrigar; Bassem Othman; Owaid Almalki; Fares Rayza; Hashem Niyaz; Hesham Elmakhzangy; Mohammed Hatem
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Ultrasonographic measurement of normal common bile duct diameter and its correlation with age, sex and anthropometry.

Authors:  Nidhi Lal; Simmi Mehra; Vivek Lal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-12-05

Review 4.  Endoscopic ultrasound in common bile duct dilatation with normal liver enzymes.

Authors:  Claudio De Angelis; Milena Marietti; Mauro Bruno; Rinaldo Pellicano; Mario Rizzetto
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-07-10

5.  Dynamic liver test patterns do not predict bile duct stones.

Authors:  Chung Yao Yu; Nitzan Roth; Niraj Jani; Jaehoon Cho; Jacques Van Dam; Rick Selby; James Buxbaum
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Common bile duct dilation after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Neal Mehta; Andrew T Strong; Tyler Stevens; Kevin El-Hayek; Alfred Nelson; Adeyinka Owoyele; Ahmed Eltelbany; Prabhleen Chahal; Maged Rizk; Carol A Burke; John McMichael; Rocio Lopez; Joseph Veniero; John Vargo; Matthew Kroh; Amit Bhatt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Yield of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the investigation of bile duct dilatation in asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  Shlomit Tamir; Marius Braun; Assaf Issachar; Gil N Bachar; Ofer Benjaminov
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.623

8.  Post Roux-en-Y gastric bypass biliary dilation: natural process or significant entity?

Authors:  K El-Hayek; P Timratana; J Meranda; H Shimizu; S Eldar; B Chand
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Effects of age and cholecystectomy on common bile duct diameter as measured by endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  Fabiana Benjaminov; George Leichtman; Timna Naftali; Elizabeth E Half; Fred M Konikoff
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Determination of Diameter and Angulation of the Normal Common Bile Duct using Multidetector Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Jin-Seok Park; Don Haeng Lee; Seok Jeong; Soon Gu Cho
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 4.519

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.