Literature DB >> 22903627

Effects of age and cholecystectomy on common bile duct diameter as measured by endoscopic ultrasonography.

Fabiana Benjaminov1, George Leichtman, Timna Naftali, Elizabeth E Half, Fred M Konikoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Increased common bile duct (CBD) diameter has been attributed to aging and previous cholecystectomy. These relationships are, however, controversial and based mainly on old studies and methodologies. Our objective is to evaluate the relationship between age, cholecystectomy, and other clinical factors and CBD diameter, as measured by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS).
METHODS: We carried out a retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent EUS in our institution. Patients with an obstructing lesion of the bile ducts, previous sphincter manipulation, or insufficient data were excluded. CBD diameter was measured as a routine part of the examination, in the most distal extrapancreatic portion, between its two exterior margins. The patients were divided into five age groups. The mean CBD diameter in each group was calculated and compared with the other groups. Effects of cholecystectomy, gender, time from operation, and elevated liver enzymes were also evaluated.
RESULTS: Six hundred forty-seven patients were included in the study (66% women). Twenty-three percent were postcholecystectomy. There was no difference between the first three groups regarding CBD diameter, but it was significantly wider in groups 4 and 5 (p < 0.001). In all age groups, the postcholecystectomy patients had significantly wider CBD than those with an intact gallbladder (in all groups, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: This EUS study confirms that the CBD dilates significantly after the age of 70 years, but even in the most elderly patients, with an intact gallbladder, the normal CBD does not exceed 7.6 mm, thus a wider CBD warrants further investigation. The single additional factor contributing to dilatation of the CBD was cholecystectomy. A linear regression equation is proposed for the prediction of CBD diameter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22903627     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2445-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

1.  Helical computed tomographic cholangiography versus endosonography for suspected bile duct stones: a prospective blinded study in non-jaundiced patients.

Authors:  M Polkowski; J Palucki; J Regula; A Tilszer; E Butruk
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Common bile duct measurements in an elderly population.

Authors:  R S Perret; G D Sloop; J A Borne
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Diameters of the common bile duct in adults and postcholecystectomy patients: a study with 64-slice CT.

Authors:  Senem Senturk; Tugba Cezlan Miroglu; Aslan Bilici; Hatice Gumus; Rojbin Ceylan Tekin; Faysal Ekici; Güven Tekbas
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Linear array EUS in bile-duct lesions.

Authors:  Maria Victoria Alvarez Sanchez; Bertrand Pujol; Bertrand Napoleon
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Does the common bile duct dilate after cholecystectomy? Sonographic evaluation in 234 patients.

Authors:  B Feng; Q Song
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Is age associated with size of adult extrahepatic bile duct: sonographic study.

Authors:  M M Horrow; J C Horrow; A Niakosari; C L Kirby; H K Rosenberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Morphometrical evaluation of extrahepatic bile ducts in reference to their structural changes with aging.

Authors:  Y Takahashi; T Takahashi; W Takahashi; T Sato
Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 1.848

8.  Ultrasound evaluation of common bile duct size.

Authors:  S G Parulekar
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Gray-scale ultrasonography of the jaundiced patient.

Authors:  W F Sample; D A Sartl; L I Goldstein; M Weiner; B M Kadell
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  ERCP in patients with periampullary diverticulum.

Authors:  Andrea Rajnakova; Peter M Goh; Sing Shang Ngoi; Seng Gee Lim
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2003 May-Jun
View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic ultrasound in common bile duct dilatation with normal liver enzymes.

Authors:  Claudio De Angelis; Milena Marietti; Mauro Bruno; Rinaldo Pellicano; Mario Rizzetto
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-07-10

Review 2.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Vanja Giljaca; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 3.  Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Vanja Giljaca; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 4.  Ultrasound versus liver function tests for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Vanja Giljaca; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

5.  Utilizing CT to identify clinically significant biliary dilatation in symptomatic post-cholecystectomy patients: when should we be worried?

Authors:  Imo I Uko; Cecil Wood; Edward Nguyen; Annie Huang; Roberta Catania; Amir A Borhani; Jeanne M Horowitz; Helena Gabriel; Rajesh Keswani; Paul Nikolaidis; Frank H Miller; Linda C Kelahan
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-09-15

6.  Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: radiological predictors of malignant transformation and the introduction of bile duct dilation to current guidelines.

Authors:  Albert Strauss; Matthew Birdsey; Stefan Fritz; Bogata D Schwarz-Bundy; Frank Bergmann; Thilo Hackert; Hans-Ullrich Kauczor; Lars Grenacher; Miriam Klauss
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Diagnosis and management of choledocholithiasis in the golden age of imaging, endoscopy and laparoscopy.

Authors:  Renato Costi; Alessandro Gnocchi; Francesco Di Mario; Leopoldo Sarli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Clinical features and management of painless biliary type sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Miyatani; Hirosato Mashima; Masanari Sekine; Satohiro Matsumoto
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  Elderly persons with acute pancreatitis - specifics of the clinical course of the disease.

Authors:  Dorota Koziel; Martyna Gluszek-Osuch; Edyta Suliga; Marek Zak; Stanislaw Gluszek
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Bile duct reconstruction following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England.

Authors:  Y El-Dhuwaib; J Slavin; D J Corless; I Begaj; D Durkin; M Deakin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.