Literature DB >> 19451367

Likelihood ratio decisions in memory: three implied regularities.

Murray Glanzer1, Andrew Hilford, Laurence T Maloney.   

Abstract

We analyze four general signal detection models for recognition memory that differ in their distributional assumptions. Our analyses show that a basic assumption of signal detection theory, the likelihood ratio decision axis, implies three regularities in recognition memory: (1) the mirror effect, (2) the variance effect, and (3) the z-ROC length effect. For each model, we present the equations that produce the three regularities and show, in computed examples, how they do so. We then show that the regularities appear in data from a range of recognition studies. The analyses and data in our study support the following generalization: Individuals make efficient recognition decisions on the basis of likelihood ratios.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19451367     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.3.431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  23 in total

1.  Item recognition memory and the receiver operating characteristic.

Authors:  Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The mirror effect and mixture signal detection theory.

Authors:  Lawrence T DeCarlo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Decision noise: an explanation for observed violations of signal detection theory.

Authors:  Shane T Mueller; Christoph T Weidemann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

4.  Decision rules for recognition memory confidence judgments.

Authors:  V Stretch; J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; M Steyvers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

6.  Recognition memory for words and pictures at short and long retention intervals.

Authors:  R E Gehring; M P Toglia; G A Kimble
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1976-05

7.  The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory.

Authors:  M Glanzer; J K Adams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Testing models of decision making using confidence ratings in classification.

Authors:  J D Balakrishnan; R Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The mirror effect and attention-likelihood theory: a reflective analysis.

Authors:  B B Murdock
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Word frequency and word likeness mirror effects in episodic recognition memory.

Authors:  Andrew Heathcote; Elizabeth Ditton; Kristie Mitchell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06
View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Three regularities of recognition memory: the role of bias.

Authors:  Andrew Hilford; Laurence T Maloney; Murray Glanzer; Kisok Kim
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

2.  One mirror effect: The regularities of recognition memory.

Authors:  Andrew Hilford; Murray Glanzer; Kisok Kim; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-02

3.  Shifting the criterion is not the difficult part of trial-by-trial criterion shifts in recognition memory.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; James E Olchowski
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-01

4.  The role of mnemonic processes in pure-target and pure-foil recognition memory.

Authors:  Gregory J Koop; Amy H Criss; Kenneth J Malmberg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

5.  Fechner's law in metacognition: A quantitative model of visual working memory confidence.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Aspen H Yoo; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Diffusion model drift rates can be influenced by decision processes: an analysis of the strength-based mirror effect.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Roger Ratcliff; Corey N White
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Toward a more comprehensive modeling of sequential lineups.

Authors:  David Kellen; Ryan M McAdoo
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-07-22

8.  Sources of Interference in Memory Across Development.

Authors:  Hyungwook Yim; Adam F Osth; Vladimir M Sloutsky; Simon J Dennis
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2022-06-20

9.  Metacognitive awareness and adaptive recognition biases.

Authors:  Diana Selmeczy; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Some Memories are Odder than Others: Judgments of Episodic Oddity Violate Known Decision Rules.

Authors:  Akira R O'Connor; Emily N Guhl; Justin C Cox; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.