Literature DB >> 28221087

Fechner's law in metacognition: A quantitative model of visual working memory confidence.

Ronald van den Berg1, Aspen H Yoo2, Wei Ji Ma2.   

Abstract

Although visual working memory (VWM) has been studied extensively, it is unknown how people form confidence judgments about their memories. Peirce (1878) speculated that Fechner's law-which states that sensation is proportional to the logarithm of stimulus intensity-might apply to confidence reports. Based on this idea, we hypothesize that humans map the precision of their VWM contents to a confidence rating through Fechner's law. We incorporate this hypothesis into the best available model of VWM encoding and fit it to data from a delayed-estimation experiment. The model provides an excellent account of human confidence rating distributions as well as the relation between performance and confidence. Moreover, the best-fitting mapping in a model with a highly flexible mapping closely resembles the logarithmic mapping, suggesting that no alternative mapping exists that accounts better for the data than Fechner's law. We propose a neural implementation of the model and find that this model also fits the behavioral data well. Furthermore, we find that jointly fitting memory errors and confidence ratings boosts the power to distinguish previously proposed VWM encoding models by a factor of 5.99 compared to fitting only memory errors. Finally, we show that Fechner's law also accounts for metacognitive judgments in a word recognition memory task, which is a first indication that it may be a general law in metacognition. Our work presents the first model to jointly account for errors and confidence ratings in VWM and could lay the groundwork for understanding the computational mechanisms of metacognition. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28221087      PMCID: PMC5321570          DOI: 10.1037/rev0000060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  57 in total

1.  Kin recognition and the perceived facial similarity of children.

Authors:  Laurence T Maloney; Maria F Dal Martello
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Post-decision wagering measures metacognitive content, not sensory consciousness.

Authors:  Anil K Seth
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2007-06-27

3.  Variability in encoding precision accounts for visual short-term memory limitations.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Hongsup Shin; Wen-Chuang Chou; Ryan George; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Measuring and interpreting neuronal correlations.

Authors:  Marlene R Cohen; Adam Kohn
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Stimulus-specific variability in color working memory with delayed estimation.

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae; Maria Olkkonen; Sarah R Allred; Colin Wilson; Jonathan I Flombaum
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  A theory for the use of visual orientation information which exploits the columnar structure of striate cortex.

Authors:  M A Paradiso
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 8.  The neural basis of metacognitive ability.

Authors:  Stephen M Fleming; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Probabilistic computation in human perception under variability in encoding precision.

Authors:  Shaiyan Keshvari; Ronald van den Berg; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A signature of neural coding at human perceptual limits.

Authors:  Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  22 in total

1.  Variable precision in visual perception.

Authors:  Shan Shen; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Distinguishing the Roles of Dorsolateral and Anterior PFC in Visual Metacognition.

Authors:  Medha Shekhar; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Monkeys and humans take local uncertainty into account when localizing a change.

Authors:  Deepna Devkar; Anthony A Wright; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Informed guessing in change detection.

Authors:  Stephen Rhodes; Nelson Cowan; Kyle O Hardman; Robert H Logie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Tracking attentional states: Assessing the relationship between sustained and selective focused attention in visual working memory.

Authors:  Andra Arnicane; Alessandra S Souza
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Suboptimality in Perceptual Decision Making.

Authors:  Dobromir Rahnev; Rachel N Denison
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 12.579

7.  Swap errors in spatial working memory are guesses.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

Review 8.  Representations of uncertainty: where art thou?

Authors:  Ádám Koblinger; József Fiser; Máté Lengyel
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2021-04

9.  Joint representation of working memory and uncertainty in human cortex.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Li; Thomas C Sprague; Aspen H Yoo; Wei Ji Ma; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  The nature of metacognitive inefficiency in perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Medha Shekhar; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.