Literature DB >> 19450608

Chromatin remodelers act globally, sequence positions nucleosomes locally.

Peretz D Partensky1, Geeta J Narlikar.   

Abstract

The precise placement of nucleosomes has large regulatory effects on gene expression. Recent work suggests that nucleosome placement is regulated in part by the affinity of the underlying DNA sequence for the histone octamer. Nucleosome locations are also regulated by several different ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling enzymes. This raises the question of whether DNA sequence influences the activity of chromatin remodeling enzymes. DNA sequence could most simply regulate nucleosome remodeling through its effect on nucleosome stability. In such a model, unstable nucleosomes would be remodeled faster than stable nucleosomes. It is also possible that certain DNA elements could regulate remodeling by inhibiting the interaction of nucleosomes with the remodeling enzyme. A third possibility is that DNA sequence could regulate the outcome of remodeling by influencing how reaction intermediates collapse into a particular set of stable nucleosomal positions. Here we dissect the contribution from these potential mechanisms to the activities of yeast RSC and human ACF, which are representative members of two major classes of remodeling complexes. We find that varying the histone-DNA affinity over 3 orders of magnitude has negligible effects on the rates of nucleosome remodeling and ATP hydrolysis by these two enzymes. This suggests that the rate-limiting step for nucleosome remodeling may not involve the disruption of histone-DNA contacts. We further find that a specific curved DNA element previously hypothesized to inhibit ACF activity does not inhibit substrate binding or remodeling by ACF. The element, however, does influence the distribution of nucleosome positions generated by ACF. Our data support a model in which remodeling enzymes move nucleosomes to new locations by a general sequence-independent mechanism. However, consequent to the rate-limiting remodeling step, the local DNA sequence promotes a collapse of remodeling intermediates into highly resolved positions that are dictated by thermodynamic differences between adjacent positions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19450608      PMCID: PMC2813840          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.04.085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  51 in total

Review 1.  Expression and purification of recombinant histones and nucleosome reconstitution.

Authors:  K Luger; T J Rechsteiner; T J Richmond
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  1999

2.  The main role of the sequence-dependent DNA elasticity in determining the free energy of nucleosome formation on telomeric DNAs.

Authors:  I Filesi; S Cacchione; P De Santis; L Rossetti; M Savino
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2000-01-24       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  A theoretical model for the prediction of sequence-dependent nucleosome thermodynamic stability.

Authors:  C Anselmi; G Bocchinfuso; P De Santis; M Savino; A Scipioni
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Generation and interconversion of multiple distinct nucleosomal states as a mechanism for catalyzing chromatin fluidity.

Authors:  G J Narlikar; M L Phelan; R E Kingston
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 5.  Role of DNA sequence in nucleosome stability and dynamics.

Authors:  J Widom
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.318

Review 6.  Cooperation between complexes that regulate chromatin structure and transcription.

Authors:  Geeta J Narlikar; Hua-Ying Fan; Robert E Kingston
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-02-22       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  GAL4 directs nucleosome sliding induced by NURF.

Authors:  Ju-Gyeong Kang; Ali Hamiche; Carl Wu
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Chromatin-associated periodicity in genetic variation downstream of transcriptional start sites.

Authors:  Shin Sasaki; Cecilia C Mello; Atsuko Shimada; Yoichiro Nakatani; Shin-Ichi Hashimoto; Masako Ogawa; Kouji Matsushima; Sam Guoping Gu; Masahiro Kasahara; Budrul Ahsan; Atsushi Sasaki; Taro Saito; Yutaka Suzuki; Sumio Sugano; Yuji Kohara; Hiroyuki Takeda; Andrew Fire; Shinichi Morishita
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Human SWI/SNF directs sequence-specific chromatin changes on promoter polynucleosomes.

Authors:  Hillel I Sims; Cassandra B Baughman; Gavin R Schnitzler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Dynamic remodeling of individual nucleosomes across a eukaryotic genome in response to transcriptional perturbation.

Authors:  Sushma Shivaswamy; Akshay Bhinge; Yongjun Zhao; Steven Jones; Martin Hirst; Vishwanath R Iyer
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  25 in total

1.  Computational study of remodeling in a nucleosomal array.

Authors:  Raoul D Schram; Henrike Klinker; Peter B Becker; Helmut Schiessel
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 1.890

2.  Histone occupancy in vivo at the 601 nucleosome binding element is determined by transcriptional history.

Authors:  Roberto Perales; Lian Zhang; David Bentley
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Kinetic proofreading in chromatin remodeling: the case of ISWI/ACF.

Authors:  Ralf Blossey; Helmut Schiessel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Nucleosome positioning in yeasts: methods, maps, and mechanisms.

Authors:  Corinna Lieleg; Nils Krietenstein; Maria Walker; Philipp Korber
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  The Sequence of Nucleosomal DNA Modulates Sliding by the Chd1 Chromatin Remodeler.

Authors:  Jessica Winger; Gregory D Bowman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  The RSC chromatin remodelling enzyme has a unique role in directing the accurate positioning of nucleosomes.

Authors:  Christian J Wippo; Lars Israel; Shinya Watanabe; Andreas Hochheimer; Craig L Peterson; Philipp Korber
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 7.  Major Determinants of Nucleosome Positioning.

Authors:  Răzvan V Chereji; David J Clark
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  DNA sequence-dependent mechanics and protein-assisted bending in repressor-mediated loop formation.

Authors:  James Q Boedicker; Hernan G Garcia; Stephanie Johnson; Rob Phillips
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Divergent human remodeling complexes remove nucleosomes from strong positioning sequences.

Authors:  Chuong D Pham; Xi He; Gavin R Schnitzler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Dynamics of nucleosome remodelling by individual ACF complexes.

Authors:  Timothy R Blosser; Janet G Yang; Michael D Stone; Geeta J Narlikar; Xiaowei Zhuang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.