Literature DB >> 24231252

DNA sequence-dependent mechanics and protein-assisted bending in repressor-mediated loop formation.

James Q Boedicker1, Hernan G Garcia, Stephanie Johnson, Rob Phillips.   

Abstract

As the chief informational molecule of life, DNA is subject to extensive physical manipulations. The energy required to deform double-helical DNA depends on sequence, and this mechanical code of DNA influences gene regulation, such as through nucleosome positioning. Here we examine the sequence-dependent flexibility of DNA in bacterial transcription factor-mediated looping, a context for which the role of sequence remains poorly understood. Using a suite of synthetic constructs repressed by the Lac repressor and two well-known sequences that show large flexibility differences in vitro, we make precise statistical mechanical predictions as to how DNA sequence influences loop formation and test these predictions using in vivo transcription and in vitro single-molecule assays. Surprisingly, sequence-dependent flexibility does not affect in vivo gene regulation. By theoretically and experimentally quantifying the relative contributions of sequence and the DNA-bending protein HU to DNA mechanical properties, we reveal that bending by HU dominates DNA mechanics and masks intrinsic sequence-dependent flexibility. Such a quantitative understanding of how mechanical regulatory information is encoded in the genome will be a key step towards a predictive understanding of gene regulation at single-base pair resolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24231252      PMCID: PMC3915735          DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/6/066005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Biol        ISSN: 1478-3967            Impact factor:   2.583


  73 in total

1.  The effect of the DNA conformation on the rate of NtrC activated transcription of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.sigma(54) holoenzyme.

Authors:  A Schulz; J Langowski; K Rippe
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-07-21       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Octamerization of lambda CI repressor is needed for effective repression of P(RM) and efficient switching from lysogeny.

Authors:  I B Dodd; A J Perkins; D Tsemitsidis; J B Egan
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Designed hyperstable Lac repressor.DNA loop topologies suggest alternative loop geometries.

Authors:  R A Mehta; J D Kahn
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-11-19       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Cyclization of short DNA fragments and bending fluctuations of the double helix.

Authors:  Quan Du; Chaim Smith; Nahum Shiffeldrim; Maria Vologodskaia; Alexander Vologodskii
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  DNA looping in prokaryotes: experimental and theoretical approaches.

Authors:  Axel Cournac; Jacqueline Plumbridge
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Theoretical and experimental dissection of DNA loop-mediated repression.

Authors:  James Q Boedicker; Hernan G Garcia; Rob Phillips
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Extreme bendability of DNA less than 100 base pairs long revealed by single-molecule cyclization.

Authors:  Reza Vafabakhsh; Taekjip Ha
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  HMG proteins and DNA flexibility in transcription activation.

Authors:  E D Ross; P R Hardwidge; L J Maher
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Sequence dependence of transcription factor-mediated DNA looping.

Authors:  Stephanie Johnson; Martin Lindén; Rob Phillips
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Interplay of protein and DNA structure revealed in simulations of the lac operon.

Authors:  Luke Czapla; Michael A Grosner; David Swigon; Wilma K Olson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Towards quantitative analysis of gene regulation by enhancers.

Authors:  Ekaterina V Nizovtseva; Stefjord Todolli; Wilma K Olson; Vasily M Studitsky
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 4.778

Review 2.  Supercoiling biases the formation of loops involved in gene regulation.

Authors:  Laura Finzi; David Dunlap
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2016-07-05

3.  Selection of DNA Cleavage Sites by Topoisomerase II Results from Enzyme-Induced Flexibility of DNA.

Authors:  Yunsu Jang; Heyjin Son; Sang-Wook Lee; Wonseok Hwang; Seung-Ryoung Jung; Jo Ann W Byl; Neil Osheroff; Sanghwa Lee
Journal:  Cell Chem Biol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 8.116

4.  Protein-mediated looping of DNA under tension requires supercoiling.

Authors:  Yan Yan; Fenfei Leng; Laura Finzi; David Dunlap
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  DNA topology confers sequence specificity to nonspecific architectural proteins.

Authors:  Juan Wei; Luke Czapla; Michael A Grosner; David Swigon; Wilma K Olson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Bacterial promoter repression by DNA looping without protein-protein binding competition.

Authors:  Nicole A Becker; Alexander M Greiner; Justin P Peters; L James Maher
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  High-resolution mapping of architectural DNA binding protein facilitation of a DNA repression loop in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Nicole A Becker; L James Maher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Genetic cargo and bacterial species set the rate of vesicle-mediated horizontal gene transfer.

Authors:  Frances Tran; James Q Boedicker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  What controls DNA looping?

Authors:  Pamela J Perez; Nicolas Clauvelin; Michael A Grosner; Andrew V Colasanti; Wilma K Olson
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Predicting the impact of promoter variability on regulatory outputs.

Authors:  Naomi N Kreamer; Rob Phillips; Dianne K Newman; James Q Boedicker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.