Literature DB >> 28432052

Genomic Instability in Cancer: Teetering on the Limit of Tolerance.

Noemi Andor1, Carlo C Maley2,3, Hanlee P Ji4,5.   

Abstract

Cancer genomic instability contributes to the phenomenon of intratumoral genetic heterogeneity, provides the genetic diversity required for natural selection, and enables the extensive phenotypic diversity that is frequently observed among patients. Genomic instability has previously been associated with poor prognosis. However, we have evidence that for solid tumors of epithelial origin, extreme levels of genomic instability, where more than 75% of the genome is subject to somatic copy number alterations, are associated with a potentially better prognosis compared with intermediate levels under this threshold. This has been observed in clonal subpopulations of larger size, especially when genomic instability is shared among a limited number of clones. We hypothesize that cancers with extreme levels of genomic instability may be teetering on the brink of a threshold where so much of their genome is adversely altered that cells rarely replicate successfully. Another possibility is that tumors with high levels of genomic instability are more immunogenic than other cancers with a less extensive burden of genetic aberrations. Regardless of the exact mechanism, but hinging on our ability to quantify how a tumor's burden of genetic aberrations is distributed among coexisting clones, genomic instability has important therapeutic implications. Herein, we explore the possibility that a high genomic instability could be the basis for a tumor's sensitivity to DNA-damaging therapies. We primarily focus on studies of epithelial-derived solid tumors. Cancer Res; 77(9); 2179-85. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28432052      PMCID: PMC5413432          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  58 in total

1.  Error catastrophe and antiviral strategy.

Authors:  Manfred Eigen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Error thresholds of replication in finite populations mutation frequencies and the onset of Muller's ratchet.

Authors:  M Nowak; P Schuster
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1989-04-20       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  The error threshold.

Authors:  Christof K Biebricher; Manfred Eigen
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.303

4.  A cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus study of the radioadaptive response of lymphocytes of individuals occupationally exposed to chronic doses of radiation.

Authors:  H Gourabi; H Mozdarani
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  PARP-3 and APLF function together to accelerate nonhomologous end-joining.

Authors:  Stuart L Rulten; Anna E O Fisher; Isabelle Robert; Maria C Zuma; Michele Rouleau; Limei Ju; Guy Poirier; Bernardo Reina-San-Martin; Keith W Caldecott
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Targeting the adaptability of heterogeneous aneuploids.

Authors:  Guangbo Chen; Wahid A Mulla; Andrei Kucharavy; Hung-Ji Tsai; Boris Rubinstein; Juliana Conkright; Scott McCroskey; William D Bradford; Lauren Weems; Jeff S Haug; Chris W Seidel; Judith Berman; Rong Li
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Divergent clonal selection dominates medulloblastoma at recurrence.

Authors:  A Sorana Morrissy; Livia Garzia; David J H Shih; Scott Zuyderduyn; Xi Huang; Patryk Skowron; Marc Remke; Florence M G Cavalli; Vijay Ramaswamy; Patricia E Lindsay; Salomeh Jelveh; Laura K Donovan; Xin Wang; Betty Luu; Kory Zayne; Yisu Li; Chelsea Mayoh; Nina Thiessen; Eloi Mercier; Karen L Mungall; Yusanne Ma; Kane Tse; Thomas Zeng; Karey Shumansky; Andrew J L Roth; Sohrab Shah; Hamza Farooq; Noriyuki Kijima; Borja L Holgado; John J Y Lee; Stuart Matan-Lithwick; Jessica Liu; Stephen C Mack; Alex Manno; K A Michealraj; Carolina Nor; John Peacock; Lei Qin; Juri Reimand; Adi Rolider; Yuan Y Thompson; Xiaochong Wu; Trevor Pugh; Adrian Ally; Mikhail Bilenky; Yaron S N Butterfield; Rebecca Carlsen; Young Cheng; Eric Chuah; Richard D Corbett; Noreen Dhalla; An He; Darlene Lee; Haiyan I Li; William Long; Michael Mayo; Patrick Plettner; Jenny Q Qian; Jacqueline E Schein; Angela Tam; Tina Wong; Inanc Birol; Yongjun Zhao; Claudia C Faria; José Pimentel; Sofia Nunes; Tarek Shalaby; Michael Grotzer; Ian F Pollack; Ronald L Hamilton; Xiao-Nan Li; Anne E Bendel; Daniel W Fults; Andrew W Walter; Toshihiro Kumabe; Teiji Tominaga; V Peter Collins; Yoon-Jae Cho; Caitlin Hoffman; David Lyden; Jeffrey H Wisoff; James H Garvin; Duncan S Stearns; Luca Massimi; Ulrich Schüller; Jaroslav Sterba; Karel Zitterbart; Stephanie Puget; Olivier Ayrault; Sandra E Dunn; Daniela P C Tirapelli; Carlos G Carlotti; Helen Wheeler; Andrew R Hallahan; Wendy Ingram; Tobey J MacDonald; Jeffrey J Olson; Erwin G Van Meir; Ji-Yeoun Lee; Kyu-Chang Wang; Seung-Ki Kim; Byung-Kyu Cho; Torsten Pietsch; Gudrun Fleischhack; Stephan Tippelt; Young Shin Ra; Simon Bailey; Janet C Lindsey; Steven C Clifford; Charles G Eberhart; Michael K Cooper; Roger J Packer; Maura Massimino; Maria Luisa Garre; Ute Bartels; Uri Tabori; Cynthia E Hawkins; Peter Dirks; Eric Bouffet; James T Rutka; Robert J Wechsler-Reya; William A Weiss; Lara S Collier; Adam J Dupuy; Andrey Korshunov; David T W Jones; Marcel Kool; Paul A Northcott; Stefan M Pfister; David A Largaespada; Andrew J Mungall; Richard A Moore; Nada Jabado; Gary D Bader; Steven J M Jones; David Malkin; Marco A Marra; Michael D Taylor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Hsp90 stress potentiates rapid cellular adaptation through induction of aneuploidy.

Authors:  Guangbo Chen; William D Bradford; Chris W Seidel; Rong Li
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Mutator mutations enhance tumorigenic efficiency across fitness landscapes.

Authors:  Robert A Beckman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Oxidative stress activates a specific p53 transcriptional response that regulates cellular senescence and aging.

Authors:  Valentina Gambino; Giulia De Michele; Oriella Venezia; Pierluigi Migliaccio; Valentina Dall'Olio; Loris Bernard; Simone Paolo Minardi; Maria Agnese Della Fazia; Daniela Bartoli; Giuseppe Servillo; Myriam Alcalay; Lucilla Luzi; Marco Giorgio; Heidi Scrable; Pier Giuseppe Pelicci; Enrica Migliaccio
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 9.304

View more
  67 in total

1.  Loss of KMT2D induces prostate cancer ROS-mediated DNA damage by suppressing the enhancer activity and DNA binding of antioxidant transcription factor FOXO3.

Authors:  Shidong Lv; Haoran Wen; Xiongwei Shan; Jianhua Li; Yaobin Wu; Xinpei Yu; Wenhua Huang; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 4.528

2.  MRE11 Promotes Tumorigenesis by Facilitating Resistance to Oncogene-Induced Replication Stress.

Authors:  Elizabeth Spehalski; Kayla M Capper; Cheryl J Smith; Mary J Morgan; Maria Dinkelmann; Jeffrey Buis; JoAnn M Sekiguchi; David O Ferguson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Genetic variations in base excision repair pathway genes and risk of hepatoblastoma: a seven-center case-control study.

Authors:  Zhenjian Zhuo; Ao Lin; Jiao Zhang; Huitong Chen; Yong Li; Zhonghua Yang; Li Li; Suhong Li; Jiwen Cheng; Jing He
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 4.  Tumour immunotherapy: lessons from predator-prey theory.

Authors:  Phineas T Hamilton; Bradley R Anholt; Brad H Nelson
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 53.106

5.  The ectopic expression of meiCT genes promotes meiomitosis and may facilitate carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Jennifer Gantchev; Amelia Martínez Villarreal; Scott Gunn; Monique Zetka; Neils Ødum; Ivan V Litvinov
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Immune Checkpoint Profiles in Luminal B Breast Cancer (Alliance).

Authors:  Meenakshi Anurag; Mayanne Zhu; Chen Huang; Suhas Vasaikar; Junkai Wang; Jeremy Hoog; Samantha Burugu; Dongxia Gao; Vera Suman; Xiang H Zhang; Bing Zhang; Torsten Nielsen; Matthew J Ellis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Collaborations between chromatin and nuclear architecture to optimize DNA repair fidelity.

Authors:  Beata Mackenroth; Eric Alani
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2020-11-22

8.  From multi-omics integration towards novel genomic interaction networks to identify key cancer cell line characteristics.

Authors:  T J M Kuijpers; J C S Kleinjans; D G J Jennen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Gene Instability-Related lncRNA Prognostic Model of Melanoma Patients via Machine Learning Strategy.

Authors:  Kexin Yan; Yutao Wang; Yining Shao; Ting Xiao
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.375

10.  MCM4 Is a Novel Biomarker Associated With Genomic Instability, BRCAness Phenotype, and Therapeutic Potentials in Soft-Tissue Sarcoma.

Authors:  Qi Liu; Qiyuan Bao; Yiqi Xu; Yucheng Fu; Zhijian Jin; Jun Wang; Weibin Zhang; Yuhui Shen
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-06-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.