Literature DB >> 25552783

OPTIMIZATION BIAS IN ENERGY-BASED STRUCTURE PREDICTION.

Robert J Petrella1.   

Abstract

Physics-based computational approaches to predicting the structure of macromolecules such as proteins are gaining increased use, but there are remaining challenges. In the current work, it is demonstrated that in energy-based prediction methods, the degree of optimization of the sampled structures can influence the prediction results. In particular, discrepancies in the degree of local sampling can bias the predictions in favor of the oversampled structures by shifting the local probability distributions of the minimum sampled energies. In simple systems, it is shown that the magnitude of the errors can be calculated from the energy surface, and for certain model systems, derived analytically. Further, it is shown that for energy wells whose forms differ only by a randomly assigned energy shift, the optimal accuracy of prediction is achieved when the sampling around each structure is equal. Energy correction terms can be used in cases of unequal sampling to reproduce the total probabilities that would occur under equal sampling, but optimal corrections only partially restore the prediction accuracy lost to unequal sampling. For multiwell systems, the determination of the correction terms is a multibody problem; it is shown that the involved cross-correlation multiple integrals can be reduced to simpler integrals. The possible implications of the current analysis for macromolecular structure prediction are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Energy function; conformational search; energy correction; macromolecules; optimization bias; parent distribution; probability distribution function; sampling; structure prediction

Year:  2013        PMID: 25552783      PMCID: PMC4278582          DOI: 10.1142/S0219633613410149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Comput Chem            Impact factor:   0.939


  52 in total

1.  The penultimate rotamer library.

Authors:  S C Lovell; J M Word; J S Richardson; D C Richardson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-08-15

2.  The energetics of off-rotamer protein side-chain conformations.

Authors:  R J Petrella; M Karplus
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures.

Authors:  B Kuhlman; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Flexible multi-scale fitting of atomic structures into low-resolution electron density maps with elastic network normal mode analysis.

Authors:  Florence Tama; Osamu Miyashita; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction.

Authors:  Matthew P Jacobson; David L Pincus; Chaya S Rapp; Tyler J F Day; Barry Honig; David E Shaw; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-05-01

6.  How fast-folding proteins fold.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Blind predictions of protein interfaces by docking calculations in CAPRI.

Authors:  Marc F Lensink; Shoshana J Wodak
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-11-15

8.  Improving protein structure prediction with model-based search.

Authors:  T J Brunette; Oliver Brock
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Molecular modeling of proteins: a strategy for energy minimization by molecular mechanics in the AMBER force field.

Authors:  R M Kini; H J Evans
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  1991-12

Review 10.  Macromolecular modeling with rosetta.

Authors:  Rhiju Das; David Baker
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 23.643

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.