Literature DB >> 19442971

U-shaped sacral fractures: surgical treatment and quality of life.

A J G Gribnau1, P Boele van Hensbroek, R Haverlag, K J Ponsen, H D Been, J C Goslings.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: U-shaped sacral fractures are rare and highly unstable pelvic ring fractures. They are not recognised in the standard classification systems of these fractures. The fracture pattern is associated with significant neurological injury and can lead to progressive deformity and chronic pain if not diagnosed and treated properly. In recent years a variety of surgical strategies have been shown to facilitate early mobilisation and reduce early mortality as compared to non-operative strategies. Poor evidence, however, has hampered the development of a standard treatment algorithm. As for the long-term morbidity, the influence of operative treatment may be difficult to assess due to associated injury. However, evidence exists that there is a significant effect on the long-term morbidity.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the injury characteristics, choice of treatment and quality of life of U-shaped sacral fractures.
METHODS: Eight polytraumatised patients with U-shaped sacral fractures were identified over a 7-year period and evaluated retrospectively. They were analysed for fracture classification, associated injury, and injury severity. Clinical and Radiological results were evaluated. Neurological outcome was retrospectively classified by Gibbons' criteria. Long-term quality of life outcome was evaluated using the EuroQoL-6D questionnaire.
RESULTS: The study population consists of five women and three men; with a median age of 29 years. All patients sustained severe associated injury. The Injury Severity Score ranged from 17 to 45 (median 23). The median time between trauma and definitive internal fixation was 4 days (range, 2-22 days). Definitive fixation included either percutaneous iliosacral screws (n=2), transsacral plate osteosynthesis (n=1) or triangular osteosynthesis with (n=4) or without transsacral plating (n=1). Early postoperative mobilisation and early partial weight-bearing were encouraged when possible. Follow-up ranged from 5 to 65 months (median, 36 months). Pain, mood disorders and mobility problems mainly influenced patients' present general health status.
CONCLUSION: U-shaped sacral fractures present a rare and heterogeneous injury. Operative treatment depended mainly on fracture type, associated spinal fractures, and the surgeon's preference. Long-term quality of life is dominated by pain, mood disorders and moderate mobility problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19442971     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.11.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  20 in total

1.  Can lumbopelvic fixation salvage unstable complex sacral fractures?

Authors:  Clifford B Jones; Debra L Sietsema; Martin F Hoffmann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Spinopelvic dissociation: multidetector computed tomographic evaluation of fracture patterns and associated injuries at a single level 1 trauma center.

Authors:  Pushpender Gupta; Jonathan C Barnwell; Leon Lenchik; Scott D Wuertzer; Anna N Miller
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-02-25

3.  [3D image enhancer-adjusted percutaneous triangular stabilization of geriatric pelvic ring fractures : Operation technique and indications].

Authors:  Matthias Spalteholz; Jens Gulow
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Displaced spinopelvic dissociation with sacral cauda equina syndrome: outcome of surgical decompression with a preliminary management algorithm.

Authors:  Mostafa A Ayoub
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Surgical management of U-shaped sacral fractures: a systematic review of current treatment strategies.

Authors:  M A König; S Jehan; A A Boszczyk; B M Boszczyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Lumbopelvic Fixation and Sacral Decompression for U-shaped Sacral Fractures: Surgical Management and Early Outcome.

Authors:  Yuan-Long Xie; Lin Cai; An-Song Ping; Jun Lei; Zhou-Ming Deng; Chao Hu; Xiao-Bing Zhu
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-08-20

7.  Do all Isler's type sacral fractures necessarily require surgical fixation?

Authors:  Rishi M Kanna; K Guna Pratheep; Ajoy P Shetty; S Rajasekaran
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.721

8.  Functional outcome of surgically treated U-shaped sacral fractures: experience from 41 cases.

Authors:  Li He; Chengla Yi; David J Hak; Zhiyong Hou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Management of traumatic spinopelvic dissociations: review of the literature.

Authors:  W Lehmann; M Hoffmann; D Briem; L Grossterlinden; J P Petersen; M Priemel; P Pogoda; A Ruecker; J M Rueger
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.693

10.  Surgical management of U/H type sacral fractures: outcomes following iliosacral and lumbopelvic fixation.

Authors:  Meghan Kelly; Jun Zhang; Catherine A Humphrey; John T Gorczyca; Addisu Mesfin
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.