M A König1, S Jehan, A A Boszczyk, B M Boszczyk. 1. The Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Derby Road, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE: U-shaped sacral fractures usually result from axial loading of the spine with simultaneous sacral pivoting due to a horizontal fracture which leads to a highly unstable spino-pelvic dissociation. Due to the rarity of these fractures, there is lack of an agreed treatment strategy. METHODS: A thorough literature search was carried out to identify current treatment concepts. The studies were analysed for mechanism of injury, diagnostic imaging, associated injuries, type of surgery, follow-up times, complications, neurological, clinical and radiological outcome. RESULTS: Sixty-three cases were found in 12 articles. No Class I, II or III evidence was found in the literature. The most common mechanism of injury was a fall or jump from height. Pre-operative neurological deficit was noted in 50 (94.3%) out of 53 cases (not available in 10 patients). The most used surgical options were spino-pelvic fixation with or without decompression and ilio-sacral screws. Post-operative complications occurred in 24 (38.1%) patients. Average follow-up time was 18.6 months (range 2-34 months). Full neurological recovery was noted in 20 cases, partial recovery in 14 and 9 patients had no neurological recovery (5 patients were lost in follow-up). Fracture healing was mentioned in 7 articles with only 1 case of fracture reduction loss. CONCLUSION: From the current available data, an evidence based treatment strategy regarding outcome, neurological recovery or fracture healing could not be identified. Limited access and minimal-invasive surgery focussing on sacral reduction and restoration seems to offer comparable results to large spino-pelvic constructs with fewer complications and should be considered as the method of choice. If the fracture is highly unstable and displaced, spino-pelvic fixation might offer better stability.
PURPOSE: U-shaped sacral fractures usually result from axial loading of the spine with simultaneous sacral pivoting due to a horizontal fracture which leads to a highly unstable spino-pelvic dissociation. Due to the rarity of these fractures, there is lack of an agreed treatment strategy. METHODS: A thorough literature search was carried out to identify current treatment concepts. The studies were analysed for mechanism of injury, diagnostic imaging, associated injuries, type of surgery, follow-up times, complications, neurological, clinical and radiological outcome. RESULTS: Sixty-three cases were found in 12 articles. No Class I, II or III evidence was found in the literature. The most common mechanism of injury was a fall or jump from height. Pre-operative neurological deficit was noted in 50 (94.3%) out of 53 cases (not available in 10 patients). The most used surgical options were spino-pelvic fixation with or without decompression and ilio-sacral screws. Post-operative complications occurred in 24 (38.1%) patients. Average follow-up time was 18.6 months (range 2-34 months). Full neurological recovery was noted in 20 cases, partial recovery in 14 and 9 patients had no neurological recovery (5 patients were lost in follow-up). Fracture healing was mentioned in 7 articles with only 1 case of fracture reduction loss. CONCLUSION: From the current available data, an evidence based treatment strategy regarding outcome, neurological recovery or fracture healing could not be identified. Limited access and minimal-invasive surgery focussing on sacral reduction and restoration seems to offer comparable results to large spino-pelvic constructs with fewer complications and should be considered as the method of choice. If the fracture is highly unstable and displaced, spino-pelvic fixation might offer better stability.
Authors: Alexander R Vaccaro; David H Kim; Darrel S Brodke; Mitchel Harris; Jens R Chapman; Thomas Schildhauer; Milton L Routt; Rick C Sasso Journal: Instr Course Lect Date: 2004
Authors: Carlo Bellabarba; Thomas A Schildhauer; Alexander R Vaccaro; Jens R Chapman Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2006-05-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Thomas A Schildhauer; Carlo Bellabarba; Sean E Nork; David P Barei; Milton L Chip Routt; Jens R Chapman Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: E Mouhsine; M Wettstein; C Schizas; O Borens; C-H Blanc; P-F Leyvraz; N Theumann; R Garofalo Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2005-04-21 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Thomas A Schildhauer; William R Ledoux; Jens R Chapman; M Bradford Henley; Allan F Tencer; M L Chip Routt Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: W Lehmann; M Hoffmann; D Briem; L Grossterlinden; J P Petersen; M Priemel; P Pogoda; A Ruecker; J M Rueger Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2012-09-25 Impact factor: 3.693