W Lehmann1, M Hoffmann2, D Briem2, L Grossterlinden2, J P Petersen2, M Priemel2, P Pogoda2, A Ruecker2, J M Rueger2. 1. Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. wlehmann@uke.de. 2. Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Spinopelvic dissociation is a rare high-energy injury pattern in adults associated with high morbidity and an increased rate of neurological deficits. The purpose of this article is the conception of fracture type-associated treatment recommendations. METHODS: This article is based on our own experience with spinopelvic dissociations and a review of the current literature. RESULTS: Bilateral vertical plus an optional transverse fracture component configures spinopelvic dissociations as "U"- or "H"-shaped, with the result of a spinopelvic dissociation. "Y"-, "T"- or "II"-shaped fractures do not necessarily belong to this entity but can be subsumed to this entity in a wider sense. The surgical treatment of these injuries remains challenging. Initial haemodynamic stabilisation represents the main goal of primary care until definitive treatment can be performed. Anatomical reduction is demanding and even more complex in fracture areas with large comminution. Surgical treatment options depend on the fracture type, including transsacral screws, sacral banding and spinopelvic fixation, plus combinations of these procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Spinopelvic dissociations remain highly complex injuries. "U"- and "H"-shaped fractures usually require triangular fixation, whereas "II"-, "Y"- and "T"-shaped fractures might be sufficiently stabilised with transsacral screws.
PURPOSE: Spinopelvic dissociation is a rare high-energy injury pattern in adults associated with high morbidity and an increased rate of neurological deficits. The purpose of this article is the conception of fracture type-associated treatment recommendations. METHODS: This article is based on our own experience with spinopelvic dissociations and a review of the current literature. RESULTS: Bilateral vertical plus an optional transverse fracture component configures spinopelvic dissociations as "U"- or "H"-shaped, with the result of a spinopelvic dissociation. "Y"-, "T"- or "II"-shaped fractures do not necessarily belong to this entity but can be subsumed to this entity in a wider sense. The surgical treatment of these injuries remains challenging. Initial haemodynamic stabilisation represents the main goal of primary care until definitive treatment can be performed. Anatomical reduction is demanding and even more complex in fracture areas with large comminution. Surgical treatment options depend on the fracture type, including transsacral screws, sacral banding and spinopelvic fixation, plus combinations of these procedures. CONCLUSIONS:Spinopelvic dissociations remain highly complex injuries. "U"- and "H"-shaped fractures usually require triangular fixation, whereas "II"-, "Y"- and "T"-shaped fractures might be sufficiently stabilised with transsacral screws.
Authors: Thomas A Schildhauer; Carlo Bellabarba; Sean E Nork; David P Barei; Milton L Chip Routt; Jens R Chapman Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: E Mouhsine; M Wettstein; C Schizas; O Borens; C-H Blanc; P-F Leyvraz; N Theumann; R Garofalo Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2005-04-21 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Thomas A Schildhauer; William R Ledoux; Jens R Chapman; M Bradford Henley; Allan F Tencer; M L Chip Routt Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Stefan Huber-Wagner; Rolf Lefering; Lars-Mikael Qvick; Markus Körner; Michael V Kay; Klaus-Jürgen Pfeifer; Maximilian Reiser; Wolf Mutschler; Karl-Georg Kanz Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-03-25 Impact factor: 79.321