Literature DB >> 30128879

Lumbopelvic Fixation and Sacral Decompression for U-shaped Sacral Fractures: Surgical Management and Early Outcome.

Yuan-Long Xie1, Lin Cai1, An-Song Ping1, Jun Lei2, Zhou-Ming Deng1, Chao Hu1, Xiao-Bing Zhu1.   

Abstract

U-shaped sacral fractures are rare and often difficult to diagnose primarily due to the difficulty in obtaining adequate imaging and the severe associated injuries. These fractures are highly unstable and frequently cause neurological deficits. The majority of surgeons have limited experience in management of U-shaped sacral fractures. No standard treatment protocol for U-shaped sacral fractures has been available till now. This study aimed to examine the management of U-shaped sacral fractures and the early outcomes. Clinical data of 15 consecutive patients with U-shaped sacral fracture who were admitted to our trauma center between 2009 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographics, fracture classification, mechanism of injury and operative treatment and deformity angle were assessed. All the patients were treated with lumbopelvic fixation or (and) sacral decompression. EQ-5d score was applied to evaluate the patients' quality of life. Of the 15 consecutive patients with U-shaped sacral fracture, the mean age was 28.8 years (range: 15-55 years) at the time of injury. There were 6 females and 9 males. The mean followup time was 22.7 months (range: 9 47 months) and mean full weight-bearing time was 9.9 weeks (range: 8-14 weeks). Ten patients received lumbopelvic fixation and sacral decompression, one lombosacral fixation, and 4 merely sacral decompression due to delayed diagnosis or surgery. The post-operation deformity angle (mean 27.87°, and range: 8°-90°) of the sacrum was smaller than that pre-operation (mean 35.67; range: 15-90) with no significance difference noted. At the latest follow-up, all patients obtained neurological recovery with different extents. Visual analogue score (VAS) was reduced from preoperative 7.07 (range: 5-9) to postoperetive 1.93 (range: 1-3). All patients could walk without any aid after treatment. Eight patients were able to care for themselves and undertook some daily activities. Five patients had returned to work foil time. In conclusion, lumbopelvic fixation is an effective method for stabilization of U-shaped sacral fractures with fewer complications developed. Effective reduction and firm fixation are the prerequisite of early mobilization and neurological recovery. Sacral decompression effectively promotes neurological recovery even in patients with old U-shaped sacral fractures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  U-shaped; lumbopelvic fixation; neurological deficit; sacral decompression; sacral fractures; surgical management

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30128879     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-018-1931-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Sci        ISSN: 2523-899X


  19 in total

1.  Accuracy of the advanced trauma life support guidelines for predicting systolic blood pressure using carotid, femoral, and radial pulses: observational study.

Authors:  C D Deakin; J L Low
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-16

Review 2.  Diagnosis and management of sacral spine fractures.

Authors:  Alexander R Vaccaro; David H Kim; Darrel S Brodke; Mitchel Harris; Jens R Chapman; Thomas Schildhauer; Milton L Routt; Rick C Sasso
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2004

3.  Decompression and lumbopelvic fixation for sacral fracture-dislocations with spino-pelvic dissociation.

Authors:  Thomas A Schildhauer; Carlo Bellabarba; Sean E Nork; David P Barei; Milton L Chip Routt; Jens R Chapman
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 4.  [Sacral fracture with spino-pelvic dissociation: a literature review].

Authors:  I Cearra; R Alonso; D Martínez-Ogalla; J Hoyos; A Lauzirika; R Mongil; E Alvarez-Irusteta
Journal:  Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol       Date:  2013-10-02

5.  U-shaped sacral fractures: surgical treatment and quality of life.

Authors:  A J G Gribnau; P Boele van Hensbroek; R Haverlag; K J Ponsen; H D Been; J C Goslings
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 6.  Imaging of sacral fractures.

Authors:  J H White; C Hague; S Nicolaou; R Gee; L O Marchinkow; P L Munk
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries.

Authors:  F Denis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  U-shaped sacral fracture: an easily missed fracture with high morbidity. A report of two cases.

Authors:  P Hussin; C Y W Chan; L B Saw; M K Kwan
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Triangular osteosynthesis and iliosacral screw fixation for unstable sacral fractures: a cadaveric and biomechanical evaluation under cyclic loads.

Authors:  Thomas A Schildhauer; William R Ledoux; Jens R Chapman; M Bradford Henley; Allan F Tencer; M L Chip Routt
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  U-type bilateral sacral fracture with spino-pelvic dissociation caused by epileptic seizure.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Ian Verrall; Rowan Walker; Kevin Tetsworth; Herwig Drobetz
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-03-03
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Spinopelvic fixation for vertically unstable AO type C pelvic fractures and sacral fractures with spinopelvic dissociation- A systematic review and pooled analysis involving 479 patients.

Authors:  Sandeep Patel; Akash Ghosh; Karan Jindal; Vishal Kumar; Sameer Aggarwal; Prasoon Kumar
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-02-01

2.  FRAGILITY FRACTURES OF THE SACRUM: A SILENT EPIDEMIC.

Authors:  Stefano Cattaneo; Marco Adriani; Stefano Tonolini; Michel Oransky; Claudio Galante; Giuseppe Grava; Giuseppe Milano; Alessandro Casiraghi
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-10-13

3.  Functional outcome of traumatic spinopelvic instabilities treated with lumbopelvic fixation.

Authors:  Emre Yilmaz; Martin F Hoffmann; Alexander von Glinski; Christiane Kruppa; Uwe Hamsen; Cameron K Schmidt; Ahmet Oernek; Matthias Koenigshausen; Marcel Dudda; Thomas A Schildhauer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.