Literature DB >> 19441160

Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology.

Martin K Oehler1.   

Abstract

Robotic surgery is the latest development in minimal invasive surgery. It provides superior visualisation and dexterity and therefore allows the surgeon to perform complex tasks that would exceed his/her abilities with conventional laparoscopy and would be associated with an increased morbidity if performed by laparotomy. Current evidence demonstrates the feasibility and safety of this technology in gynaecology. The costs of robotic surgery remain one of the main sources of controversy but are expected to come down with further developments of the technology. If evidence-based long-term outcome evaluations show the superiority of robotic surgery in comparison to conventional laparoscopic and open surgery, this technology will have a major impact on gynaecological surgery.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19441160     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2009.00950.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  10 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted infrarenal aortic lymphadenectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial staging using a single docking procedure.

Authors:  Ahmet Göçmen; Fatih Sanlıkan; Mustafa Gazi Uçar
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Case Rep       Date:  2012-01-08

Review 2.  WITHDRAWN: Robotic assisted surgery for gynaecological cancer.

Authors:  Gang Shi; DongHao Lu; Zhihong Liu; Dan Liu; Xiaoyan Zhou
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-12-11

3.  The role of tactile feedback in grip force during laparoscopic training tasks.

Authors:  Christopher R Wottawa; Jeremiah R Cohen; Richard E Fan; James W Bisley; Martin O Culjat; Warren S Grundfest; Erik P Dutson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Evaluating tactile feedback in robotic surgery for potential clinical application using an animal model.

Authors:  Christopher R Wottawa; Bradley Genovese; Bryan N Nowroozi; Steven D Hart; James W Bisley; Warren S Grundfest; Erik P Dutson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Comparison of outcomes between laparotomy and robotic technique for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ahmet Göçmen; Fatih Şanlıkan; Mustafa Gazi Uçar
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-06-27

6.  Patient satisfaction with robotic surgery.

Authors:  Emma Long; Fiona Kew
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-12-29

7.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic repair of a vesicovaginal fistula: a time-consuming novelty or an effective tool?

Authors:  Carsten S Pietersma; Henk W R Schreuder; Anko Kooistra; Steven E Schraffordt Koops
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-06-10

8.  Robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: review of surgical and oncological outcomes.

Authors:  Seracchioli Renato; Mabrouk Mohamed; Solfrini Serena; Montanari Giulia; Ferrini Giulia; Giovanardi Giulia; Raimondo Diego; Schiavina Riccardo
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-11-09

9.  ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway versus Cuffed Endotracheal Tube for Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures under General Anesthesia: A Random Comparative Study.

Authors:  Suchita Shailesh Parikh; Shivam Bipin Parekh; Chaula Doshi; Varsha Vyas
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

Review 10.  Robot-Assisted Surgery in Gynecology.

Authors:  Gayatri R Bankar; Ajay Keoliya
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.