Literature DB >> 19440671

Influence of intravenous contrast agent on dose calculation in 3-D treatment planning for radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations.

Angelika Zabel-du Bois1, Benjamin Ackermann, Henrik Hauswald, Oliver Schramm, Gabriele Sroka-Perez, Peter Huber, Jürgen Debus, Stefanie Milker-Zabel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of local density increase by i.v. contrast agent on dose calculation in linac-based radiosurgery (RS) of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: RS was performed after three-dimensional (3-D) treatment planning using a total number of nine to 14 beams. Mean target volume was 5.3 cm(3) (range, 0.1-41.2 cm(3)). Mean maximum diameter was 23.2 mm (range, 8-51 mm). Dose deviation was estimated and calculated from the enhanced and unenhanced datasets of 30 patients. Dose calculation was performed using the same RS treatment plan on both datasets. Both plans were standardized to 1 Gy at isocenter with the same dose weight for all beams.
RESULTS: Mean difference of Hounsfield units (DeltaHU) between enhanced and unenhanced CT was 152 HU (range, 50-350 HU). The estimated dose deviation was <or= 1% in 80% of cases with a mean deviation of 0.67% and a maximum dose deviation of 1.8%. With increasing DeltaHU and increasing maximum diameter dose deviation increased as well. The calculated overdosage in ten datasets of enhanced and unenhanced CT scans was 0.66% mean (range, 0.2-1.2%).
CONCLUSION: The use of i.v. contrast agent in 3-D treatment planning for RS of cerebral AVMs may lead to an underestimation of actual applied dose. The effect on dose calculation is rather low with dose deviations < +1% in most of the cases. However, there are cases especially in large AVMs with high DeltaHU located next to critical, radiosensitive structures in which an additional unenhanced CT scan is recommended for exact dose calculation to avoid side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19440671     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-009-1927-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  14 in total

1.  Relative electron density calibration of CT scanners for radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  S J Thomas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Influence of CT contrast agents on dose calculations in a 3D treatment planning system.

Authors:  U Ramm; M Damrau; S Mose; K H Manegold; C G Rahl; H D Böttcher
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  An analysis of the dose-response for arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery and other factors affecting obliteration.

Authors:  John C Flickinger; Douglas Kondziolka; Ann H Maitz; L Dade Lunsford
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  A method for conversion of Hounsfield number to electron density and prediction of macroscopic pair production cross-sections.

Authors:  T Knöös; M Nilsson; L Ahlgren
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  The direct use of CT numbers in radiotherapy dosage calculations for inhomogeneous media.

Authors:  R P Parker; P A Hobday; K J Cassell
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Linac radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: results in 169 patients.

Authors:  M Schlienger; D Atlan; D Lefkopoulos; L Merienne; E Touboul; O Missir; F Nataf; H Mammar; K Platoni; P Grandjean; J N Foulquier; J Huart; C Oppenheim; J F Meder; E Houdart; J J Merland
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Treatment outcome after linac-based radiosurgery in cerebral arteriovenous malformations: retrospective analysis of factors affecting obliteration.

Authors:  Angelika Zabel; Stefanie Milker-Zabel; Peter Huber; Daniela Schulz-Ertner; Wolfgang Schlegel; Jürgen Debus
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 8.  Fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy in the management of benign cavernous sinus meningiomas : long-term experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Stefanie Milker-Zabel; Angelika Zabel-du Bois; Peter Huber; Wolfgang Schlegel; Jürgen Debus
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Long-term follow-up of patients with pituitary macroadenomas after postoperative radiation therapy: analysis of tumor control and functional outcome.

Authors:  Tanja Langsenlehner; Claudia Stiegler; Franz Quehenberger; Günther C Feigl; Gabi Jakse; Michael Mokry; Uwe Langsenlehner; Karin S Kapp; Ramona Mayer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of glomus jugulare tumors. Local control, toxicity, symptomatology, and quality of life.

Authors:  Martin Henzel; Klaus Hamm; Markus W Gross; Gunnar Surber; Gabriele Kleinert; Thomas Failing; Helmut Sitter; Gerd Strassmann; Rita Engenhart-Cabillic
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.621

View more
  9 in total

1.  Computed tomography as a source of electron density information for radiation treatment planning.

Authors:  Witold Skrzyński; Sylwia Zielińska-Dabrowska; Marta Wachowicz; Wioletta Slusarczyk-Kacprzyk; Paweł F Kukołowicz; Wojciech Bulski
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Hounsfield units variations: impact on CT-density based conversion tables and their effects on dose distribution.

Authors:  B Zurl; R Tiefling; P Winkler; P Kindl; K S Kapp
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Gene expression signatures in the peripheral blood after radiosurgery of human cerebral arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Angelika Zabel-du Bois; Mechthild Wagner-Ecker; Stefanie Milker-Zabel; Christian Schwager; Ute Wirkner; Jürgen Debus; Amir Abdollahi; Peter E Huber
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Dosimetric impact of contrast-enhanced 4d computed tomography for stereotactic body radiation therapy of hepatocelluar carcinoma.

Authors:  Rose Kamal; Deepak Thaper; Rishabh Kumar; Gaganpreet Singh; Hanuman P Yadav; Arun S Oinam; Vivek Kumar; Hitesh Sharma
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-08-12

5.  Comparison of stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of acoustic neurinomas according to 3-D tumor volume shrinkage and quality of life.

Authors:  Martin Henzel; Klaus Hamm; Helmut Sitter; Markus W Gross; Gunnar Surber; Gabriele Kleinert; Rita Engenhart-Cabillic
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Effects of 16-bit CT imaging scanning conditions for metal implants on radiotherapy dose distribution.

Authors:  Liugang Gao; Hongfei Sun; Xinye Ni; Mingming Fang; Tao Lin
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Influence of Using a Contrast-Enhanced CT Image as the Primary Image on CyberKnife Brain Radiosurgery Treatment Plans.

Authors:  Jianping Zhang; Lin Wang; Benhua Xu; Miaoyun Huang; Yuangui Chen; Xiaobo Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Dosimetric effect of CT contrast agent in CyberKnife treatment plans.

Authors:  Hee Jung Kim; Ah Ram Chang; Yang-Kyun Park; Sung-Joon Ye
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Radiotherapy treatment planning with contrast-enhanced computed tomography: feasibility of dual-energy virtual unenhanced imaging for improved dose calculations.

Authors:  Sachiko Yamada; Takashi Ueguchi; Toshiyuki Ogata; Hirokazu Mizuno; Ryota Ogihara; Masahiko Koizumi; Takeshi Shimazu; Kenya Murase; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 3.481

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.