Literature DB >> 3726171

A method for conversion of Hounsfield number to electron density and prediction of macroscopic pair production cross-sections.

T Knöös, M Nilsson, L Ahlgren.   

Abstract

A method for the determination of electron density using a narrow beam attenuation geometry is described. The method does not require that the elemental composition of the phantom materials is known. The Hounsfield numbers for the phantom materials used were determined using five different CT scanners. A relationship between Hounsfield number and electron density can thus be established, which is of considerable value in radiation therapy treatment planning procedures. Measurements of the ratio coherent/incoherent scattering of low energy photons in a certain geometry has proven valuable for determination of atomic number, which in its turn can be used for estimation of macroscopic pair production coefficients for high energy photons. The combination of knowledge of electron density with methods for determination of processes, dependent on atomic number, can form a base for adequate composition of phantom materials for purposes of testing dose calculation algorithms for photons and electrons.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3726171     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(86)80183-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  15 in total

1.  Computed tomography as a source of electron density information for radiation treatment planning.

Authors:  Witold Skrzyński; Sylwia Zielińska-Dabrowska; Marta Wachowicz; Wioletta Slusarczyk-Kacprzyk; Paweł F Kukołowicz; Wojciech Bulski
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Influence of intravenous contrast agent on dose calculation in 3-D treatment planning for radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Angelika Zabel-du Bois; Benjamin Ackermann; Henrik Hauswald; Oliver Schramm; Gabriele Sroka-Perez; Peter Huber; Jürgen Debus; Stefanie Milker-Zabel
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Can CT scan protocols used for radiotherapy treatment planning be adjusted to optimize image quality and patient dose? A systematic review.

Authors:  Anne T Davis; Antony L Palmer; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Treatment planning using MRI data: an analysis of the dose calculation accuracy for different treatment regions.

Authors:  Joakim H Jonsson; Magnus G Karlsson; Mikael Karlsson; Tufve Nyholm
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  The accuracy of treatment planning system dose modelling in the presence of brass mesh bolus.

Authors:  Neil Richmond
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-07-22

6.  CT-myelography for high-dose irradiation of spinal and paraspinal tumors with helical tomotherapy: revival of an old tool.

Authors:  Matthias Uhl; Florian Sterzing; Gregor Habl; Kai Schubert; Gabriele Sroka-Perez; Jürgen Debus; Klaus Herfarth
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Validation of prospective whole-body bone marrow dosimetry by SPECT/CT multimodality imaging in (131)I-anti-CD20 rituximab radioimmunotherapy of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Jan A Boucek; J Harvey Turner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Improving dose calculation accuracy in preclinical radiation experiments using multi-energy element resolved cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Yanqi Huang; Xiaoyu Hu; Yuncheng Zhong; Youfang Lai; Chenyang Shen; Xun Jia
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Characterization of natural rubber as a bolus material for electron beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Lukkana Apipunyasopon; Chalitpon Chaloeiparp; Thanayut Wiriyatharakij; Nakorn Phaisangittisakul
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-07-10

10.  Investigation on the performance of dedicated radiotherapy positioning devices for MR scanning for prostate planning.

Authors:  Jidi Sun; Jason A Dowling; Peter Pichler; Joel Parker; Jarad Martin; Peter Stanwell; Jameen Arm; Fred Menk; Peter B Greer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.