Literature DB >> 19437233

Continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, a validation study of Nexfin in a pregnant population.

J Akkermans1, M Diepeveen, W Ganzevoort, G A van Montfrans, B E Westerhof, H Wolf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of a non-invasive beat-to-beat continuous blood pressure monitoring device (Nexfin) in pregnancy according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
METHODS: The validation was performed according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. The test device (Nexfin, BMEYE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) calculates beat to beat blood pressure from finger pulse wave analysis. Measurements of systolic and diastolic BP in 33 volunteers were obtained using the mercury sphygmomanometer and the Nexfin alternatingly.
RESULTS: The device passed phase 1 as 30 systolic and 32 diastolic readings fell within 5 mmHg (25 required). In addition, the device also passed phase 2.1 as 68 systolic and 67 diastolic readings fell within 5 mmHg (65 required). Finally, it failed to pass phase 2.2 as 24 subjects for systolic and 23 for diastolic had at least 2/3 of their comparisons falling within 5 mmHg (22 required) but 6 subjects for systolic and 8 for diastolic had all three comparisons more than 5 mmHg different from the mercury readings (three allowed). The mean differences were 2.3 mmHg (SD 6.8) for SBP and 0.8 mmHg (SD 6.3) for DBP.
CONCLUSION: The Nexfin device passed phase 1 and phase 2.1 but failed to pass phase 2.2. However, adaptation of the data to the more permissive AAMI (mean difference <5 +/- 8 mmHg) and BHS (systolic grade B, diastolic grade A) protocols indicated adequate accuracy for application in research settings or for longitudinal within-patient tracking of blood pressure, given the possibility for continuous monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19437233     DOI: 10.1080/10641950802601260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Pregnancy        ISSN: 1064-1955            Impact factor:   2.108


  9 in total

1.  Noninvasive assessment of hemodynamics: a comparative analysis of fingertip pulse contour analysis and impedance cardiography.

Authors:  Katherine A Sauder; Paige E Pokorney; Cindy E McCrea; Jan S Ulbrecht; Penny M Kris-Etherton; Sheila G West
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 2.  Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring: a review of current applications.

Authors:  Elena Chung; Guo Chen; Brenton Alexander; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Impact of non invasive and beat-to-beat arterial pressure monitoring on intraoperative hemodynamic management.

Authors:  Guo Chen; Elena Chung; Lingzhong Meng; Brenton Alexander; Trung Vu; Joseph Rinehart; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Impact of non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring on maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery: a randomized-controlled study.

Authors:  Takashi Juri; Koichi Suehiro; Aya Kimura; Akira Mukai; Katsuaki Tanaka; Tokuhiro Yamada; Takashi Mori; Kiyonobu Nishikawa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Blood pressure measurement during cesarean delivery: Evaluation of a beat-to-beat noninvasive device (NexfinTM).

Authors:  Mathieu Bobet; Jona Joachim; Etienne Gayat; Agnès Bonnet; Kerstin Sievert; Carole Barnichon; Marc Fischler; Morgan Le Guen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Non-invasive assessment of cardiac hemodynamics in patients with advanced cancer and with chronic heart failure: a pilot feasibility study.

Authors:  Stephan von Haehling; Mitja Lainscak; Thomas Kung; Larissa Cramer; Susann Fülster; Uwe Pelzer; Bert Hildebrandt; Anja Sandek; Joerg C Schefold; Mathias Rauchhaus; Wolfram Doehner; Stefan D Anker
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.318

7.  Continuous hemodynamic monitoring in acute stroke: an exploratory analysis.

Authors:  Ayan Sen; Joseph Miller; Heidi Wilkie; Michele Moyer; Christopher Lewandowski; Richard Nowak
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-07

8.  Validation of noninvasive continuous arterial pressure measurement by ClearSight System™ during induction of anesthesia for cardiovascular surgery.

Authors:  Tadashi Tanioku; Akari Yoshida; Yuichi Aratani; Keisuke Fujii; Tomoyuki Kawamata
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  Correlation of patient characteristics with arm and finger measurements in Asian parturients: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Ming Jian Lim; Chin Wen Tan; Hon Sen Tan; Rehena Sultana; Victoria Eley; Ban Leong Sng
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.217

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.