Literature DB >> 19433628

The genealogical consequences of fecundity variance polymorphism.

Jesse E Taylor1.   

Abstract

The genealogical consequences of within-generation fecundity variance polymorphism are studied using coalescent processes structured by genetic backgrounds. I show that these processes have three distinctive features. The first is that the coalescent rates within backgrounds are not jointly proportional to the infinitesimal variance, but instead depend only on the frequencies and traits of genotypes containing each allele. Second, the coalescent processes at unlinked loci are correlated with the genealogy at the selected locus; i.e., fecundity variance polymorphism has a genomewide impact on genealogies. Third, in diploid models, there are infinitely many combinations of fecundity distributions that have the same diffusion approximation but distinct coalescent processes; i.e., in this class of models, ancestral processes and allele frequency dynamics are not in one-to-one correspondence. Similar properties are expected to hold in models that allow for heritable variation in other traits that affect the coalescent effective population size, such as sex ratio or fecundity and survival schedules.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19433628      PMCID: PMC2710161          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.109.102368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  43 in total

1.  Genealogies and weak purifying selection.

Authors:  M Przeworski; B Charlesworth; J D Wall
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Polymorphism and divergence for island-model species.

Authors:  John Wakeley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Evaluating the effect of stage-specific survivorship on the N(e)/N ratio.

Authors:  Robin S Waples
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  The genealogy of a sequence subject to purifying selection at multiple sites.

Authors:  Scott Williamson; Maria E Orive
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  The structured ancestral selection graph and the many-demes limit.

Authors:  Paul F Slade; John Wakeley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Evolution of variance in offspring number: the effects of population size and migration.

Authors:  Max Shpak
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 1.919

7.  Sex: differences in mutation, recombination, selection, gene flow, and genetic drift.

Authors:  Philip W Hedrick
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Nautural selection for within-generation variance in offspring number.

Authors:  J H Gillespie
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The coalescent process in models with selection and recombination.

Authors:  R R Hudson; N L Kaplan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  4 in total

1.  Some consequences of demographic stochasticity in population genetics.

Authors:  Todd L Parsons; Christopher Quince; Joshua B Plotkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A Wright-Fisher model with indirect selection.

Authors:  Ludovic Goudenège; Pierre-André Zitt
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  An ancestral recombination graph for diploid populations with skewed offspring distribution.

Authors:  Matthias Birkner; Jochen Blath; Bjarki Eldon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The evolution and consequences of sex-specific reproductive variance.

Authors:  Charles Mullon; Max Reuter; Laurent Lehmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.562

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.