Literature DB >> 10084898

Genealogies and weak purifying selection.

M Przeworski1, B Charlesworth, J D Wall.   

Abstract

The assumption that selection alters the genealogical tree of a sample of alleles from a population relative to the neutral expectation underlies several "tests of neutrality." Two recent papers have studied the effect of purifying selection; their suggestive but incomplete results indicate that, in the single site case, the shape of a gene genealogy for a locus may differ only from the neutral expectation. We verify this finding for weak selection using the "ancestral selection graph." We consider a wider range of models, including both a four-allele single-site model and an infinite-sites model. Our results confirm the previous claim for the symmetric-mutation single site model. We emphasize, however, that a neutral-seeming genealogy is consistent with detectable effects of selection on the distribution of allele frequences within the sample. With selection operating, the information about a sample cannot be reduced to the genealogy. As a result, a distinction needs to be made between the selected sites themselves, for which the genealogy offers insufficient information, and linked neutral variation. This distinction seems to have been overlooked in previous papers, yet it has significant implications for the interpretation of data on DNA sequence variation. In particular, it predicts that under purifying selection, the frequency spectrum of neutral mutations will not reflect the skew toward rare polymorphisms at replacement sites even if there is no recombination between them. We caution, however, that the effect of weak selection on the genealogy is specific to the model; a (more realistic) model of multiple linked sites could lead to a more distorted genealogy than is observed for a single site.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10084898     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  28 in total

1.  The effects of Hill-Robertson interference between weakly selected mutations on patterns of molecular evolution and variation.

Authors:  G A McVean; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Estimation of effective population size of HIV-1 within a host: a pseudomaximum-likelihood approach.

Authors:  Tae-Kun Seo; Jeffrey L Thorne; Masami Hasegawa; Hirohisa Kishino
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Are rare variants responsible for susceptibility to complex diseases?

Authors:  J K Pritchard
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Distinguishing between selection and population expansion in an experimental lineage of bacteriophage T7.

Authors:  Matthew W Hahn; Mark D Rausher; Clifford W Cunningham
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Intron presence-absence polymorphism in Drosophila driven by positive Darwinian selection.

Authors:  Ana Llopart; Josep M Comeron; Frédéric G Brunet; Daniel Lachaise; Manyuan Long
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Reconstructing the prior probabilities of allelic phylogenies.

Authors:  G Brian Golding
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The matrix coalescent and an application to human single-nucleotide polymorphisms.

Authors:  Stephen Wooding; Alan Rogers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Effect of recombination on the accuracy of the likelihood method for detecting positive selection at amino acid sites.

Authors:  Maria Anisimova; Rasmus Nielsen; Ziheng Yang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The effect of selection on genealogies.

Authors:  N H Barton; A M Etheridge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The structure of genealogies in the presence of purifying selection: a fitness-class coalescent.

Authors:  Aleksandra M Walczak; Lauren E Nicolaisen; Joshua B Plotkin; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.