Literature DB >> 19430219

A study of predicted bone marrow distribution on calculated marrow dose from external radiation exposures using two sets of image data for the same individual.

Peter F Caracappa1, T C Ephraim Chao, X George Xu.   

Abstract

Red bone marrow is among the tissues of the human body that are most sensitive to ionizing radiation, but red bone marrow cannot be distinguished from yellow bone marrow by normal radiographic means. When using a computational model of the body constructed from computed tomography (CT) images for radiation dose, assumptions must be applied to calculate the dose to the red bone marrow. This paper presents an analysis of two methods of calculating red bone marrow distribution: 1) a homogeneous mixture of red and yellow bone marrow throughout the skeleton, and 2) International Commission on Radiological Protection cellularity factors applied to each bone segment. A computational dose model was constructed from the CT image set of the Visible Human Project and compared to the VIP-Man model, which was derived from color photographs of the same individual. These two data sets for the same individual provide the unique opportunity to compare the methods applied to the CT-based model against the observed distribution of red bone marrow for that individual. The mass of red bone marrow in each bone segment was calculated using both methods. The effect of the different red bone marrow distributions was analyzed by calculating the red bone marrow dose using the EGS4 Monte Carlo code for parallel beams of monoenergetic photons over an energy range of 30 keV to 6 MeV, cylindrical (simplified CT) sources centered about the head and abdomen over an energy range of 30 keV to 1 MeV, and a whole-body electron irradiation treatment protocol for 3.9 MeV electrons. Applying the method with cellularity factors improves the average difference in the estimation of mass in each bone segment as compared to the mass in VIP-Man by 45% over the homogenous mixture method. Red bone marrow doses calculated by the two methods are similar for parallel photon beams at high energy (above about 200 keV), but differ by as much as 40% at lower energies. The calculated red bone marrow doses differ significantly for simplified CT and electron beam irradiation, since the computed red bone marrow dose is a strong function of the cellularity factor applied to bone segments within the primary radiation beam. These results demonstrate the importance of properly applying realistic cellularity factors to computation dose models of the human body.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19430219      PMCID: PMC2846971          DOI: 10.1097/01.HP.0000346304.45813.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  24 in total

1.  Voxel size effects in three-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy performed for trabecular bone dosimetry.

Authors:  D A Rajon; D W Jokisch; P W Patton; A P Shah; W E Bolch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Correlation between CT numbers and tissue parameters needed for Monte Carlo simulations of clinical dose distributions.

Authors:  W Schneider; T Bortfeld; W Schlegel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  All about MAX: a male adult voxel phantom for Monte Carlo calculations in radiation protection dosimetry.

Authors:  R Kramer; J W Vieira; H J Khoury; F R A Lima; D Fuelle
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-05-21       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A boundary-representation method for designing whole-body radiation dosimetry models: pregnant females at the ends of three gestational periods--RPI-P3, -P6 and -P9.

Authors:  X George Xu; Valery Taranenko; Juying Zhang; Chengyu Shi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Estimates of absorbed fractions for monoenergetic photon sources uniformly distributed in various organs of a heterogeneous phantom.

Authors:  W S Snyder; H L Fisher; M R Ford; G G Warner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Bone marrow cellularity assessed by point-counting.

Authors:  D O Ho-Yen; W Slidders
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  The adult male voxel model "Golem" segmented from whole-body CT patient data.

Authors:  M Zankl; A Wittmann
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Active bone marrow distribution as a function of age in humans.

Authors:  M Cristy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy as a means of reducing dose to bone marrow in gynecologic patients receiving whole pelvic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Anthony E Lujan; Arno J Mundt; S Diane Yamada; Jacob Rotmensch; John C Roeske
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Adult female voxel models of different stature and photon conversion coefficients for radiation protection.

Authors:  U A Fill; M Zankl; N Petoussi-Henss; M Siebert; D Regulla
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.316

View more
  4 in total

1.  Metastatic dissemination patterns of different primary tumors to the spine and other bones.

Authors:  Julia S Onken; Lucius S Fekonja; Romy Wehowsky; Vanessa Hubertus; Peter Vajkoczy
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 5.150

2.  Development of a paediatric head voxel model database for dosimetric applications.

Authors:  Andreas Stratis; Nathan Touyz; Guozhi Zhang; Reinhilde Jacobs; Ria Bogaerts; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  An exponential growth of computational phantom research in radiation protection, imaging, and radiotherapy: a review of the fifty-year history.

Authors:  X George Xu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Organ sparing of linac-based targeted marrow irradiation over total body irradiation.

Authors:  Gregory R Warrell; Valdir C Colussi; Wayne L Swanson; Paolo F Caimi; David B Mansur; Marcos J G de Lima; Gisele C Pereira
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.