Literature DB >> 23239132

Over-expectation generated in a complex appetitive goal-tracking task is capable of inducing memory reconsolidation.

Amy C Reichelt1, Jonathan L C Lee.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Discrepancies in an expected outcome have been demonstrated to result in modification of behaviour in both appetitive and aversive conditioning settings.
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we sought to establish whether overexpectation generated from compound conditioning with two previously rewarded stimuli was able to induce memory destabilisation and subsequent reconsolidation in a Pavlovian conditioned approach setting.
RESULTS: It was shown that 4 days, but not 1 day, of overexpectation training was required to induce memory reconsolidation, and this was disrupted by application of the NMDA subtype of glutamate receptor antagonist MK-801 prior to overexpectation training, but not by MK-801 application 6 h post-training.
CONCLUSIONS: These data provide evidence that the memories underlying Pavlovian conditioned approach do undergo reconsolidation and that such reconsolidation can be triggered by overexpectation. Therefore, the updating of appetitive conditioned stimulus and unconditioned stimulus associations underpinning conditioned responding in manners other than extinction training is likely achieved through memory reconsolidation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23239132     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-012-2934-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  34 in total

1.  Temporally graded requirement for protein synthesis following memory reactivation.

Authors:  Maria H Milekic; Cristina M Alberini
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-10-24       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  Mechanisms of memory stabilization: are consolidation and reconsolidation similar or distinct processes?

Authors:  Cristina M Alberini
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Spontaneous recovery from overexpectation.

Authors:  Robert A Rescorla
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Post-training, but not post-reactivation, administration of amphetamine and anisomycin modulates Pavlovian conditioned approach.

Authors:  Cory A Blaiss; Patricia H Janak
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  Persistent disruption of an established morphine conditioned place preference.

Authors:  Maria H Milekic; Sheena D Brown; Claudia Castellini; Cristina M Alberini
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Amygdalar NMDA receptors are critical for new fear learning in previously fear-conditioned rats.

Authors:  H Lee; J J Kim
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Drug inhibition of memory formation in chickens. I. Long-term memory.

Authors:  R F Mark; M E Watts
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1971-09-28

8.  Preventing the return of fear in humans using reconsolidation update mechanisms.

Authors:  Daniela Schiller; Marie-H Monfils; Candace M Raio; David C Johnson; Joseph E Ledoux; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The effect of propranolol on cognitive flexibility and memory in acute cocaine withdrawal.

Authors:  Brendan J Kelley; Kenneth R Yeager; Tom H Pepper; Robert A Bornstein; David Q Beversdorf
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.881

10.  Reconsolidation: maintaining memory relevance.

Authors:  Jonathan L C Lee
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 13.837

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Reconsolidation and psychopathology: Moving towards reconsolidation-based treatments.

Authors:  Amber B Dunbar; Jane R Taylor
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Reconsolidation of a well-learned instrumental memory.

Authors:  Marc T J Exton-McGuinness; Rosemary C Patton; Lawrence B Sacco; Jonathan L C Lee
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Reward disrupts reactivated human skill memory.

Authors:  Eran Dayan; Rony Laor-Maayany; Nitzan Censor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Rewriting the valuation and salience of alcohol-related stimuli via memory reconsolidation.

Authors:  R K Das; W Lawn; S K Kamboj
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  On the transition from reconsolidation to extinction of contextual fear memories.

Authors:  Lindsey F Cassini; Charlotte R Flavell; Olavo B Amaral; Jonathan L C Lee
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 6.  Retrieval-Dependent Mechanisms Affecting Emotional Memory Persistence: Reconsolidation, Extinction, and the Space in Between.

Authors:  Zuzana Vaverková; Amy L Milton; Emiliano Merlo
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Destabilizing Different Strengths of Fear Memories Requires Different Degrees of Prediction Error During Retrieval.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Junjiao Li; Liang Xu; Shaochen Zhao; Min Fan; Xifu Zheng
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Procedures between training and reactivation influence the destabilization of instrumental sucrose memory.

Authors:  Chaoran Cheng; Marc T J Exton-McGuinness; Jonathan L C Lee
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 3.617

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.