Literature DB >> 19425248

How interfaces affect hydrophobically driven polymer folding.

Sumanth N Jamadagni1, Rahul Godawat, Jonathan S Dordick, Shekhar Garde.   

Abstract

Studies of folding-unfolding of hydrophobic polymers in water provide an excellent starting point to probe manybody hydrophobic interactions in the context of realistic self-assembly processes. Such studies in bulk water have highlighted the similarities between thermodynamics of polymer collapse and of protein folding, and emphasized the role of hydration-water structure, density, and fluctuations-in the folding kinetics. Hydrophobic polymers are interfacially active-that is, they prefer locations at aqueous interfaces relative to bulk water-consistent with their low solubility. How does the presence of a hydrophobic solid surface or an essentially hydrophobic vapor-water interface affect the structural, thermodynamic, and kinetic aspects of polymer folding? Using extensive molecular dynamics simulations, we show that the large hydrophobic driving force for polymer collapse in bulk water is reduced at a solid alkane-water interface and further reduced at a vapor-water interface. As a result, at the solid-water interface, folded structures are marginally stable, whereas the vapor-liquid interface unfolds polymers completely. Structural sampling is also significantly affected by the interface. For example, at the solid-water interface, polymer conformations are quasi-2- dimensional, with folded states being pancake-like structures. At the vapor-water interface, the hydrophobic polymer is significantly excluded from the water phase and freely samples a broad range of compact to extended structures. Interestingly, although the driving force for folding is considerably lower, kinetics of folding are faster at both interfaces, highlighting the role of enhanced water fluctuations and dynamics at a hydrophobic interface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19425248     DOI: 10.1021/jp806528m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  7 in total

1.  Extended surfaces modulate hydrophobic interactions of neighboring solutes.

Authors:  Amish J Patel; Patrick Varilly; Sumanth N Jamadagni; Hari Acharya; Shekhar Garde; David Chandler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Thermal and structural stability of adsorbed proteins.

Authors:  Sumit Sharma; B J Berne; Sanat K Kumar
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Role of electrostatics in modulating hydrophobic interactions and barriers to hydrophobic assembly.

Authors:  Brad A Bauer; Sandeep Patel
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  An improved coarse-grained model of solvation and the hydrophobic effect.

Authors:  Patrick Varilly; Amish J Patel; David Chandler
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Patchy supramolecules as versatile tools to probe hydrophobicity in nanoglobular systems.

Authors:  Luis M Negrón; Yazmary Meléndez-Contés; José M Rivera
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Protein denaturants at aqueous-hydrophobic interfaces: self-consistent correlation between induced interfacial fluctuations and denaturant stability at the interface.

Authors:  Di Cui; Shu-Ching Ou; Sandeep Patel
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Cation folding and the thermal stability limit of the ionic liquid [BMIM+][BF4 -] under total vacuum.

Authors:  J Alberto Arroyo-Valdez; Gonzalo Viramontes-Gamboa; Roberto Guerra-Gonzalez; Mariana Ramos-Estrada; Enrique Lima; José L Rivera
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.361

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.