Literature DB >> 19424694

Upward and inward displacements of the acetabular component increase stress on femoral head in single endoprothesis models.

Zhiqi Zhang1, Ming Fu, Yan Kang, Yi Chen, Weiming Liao.   

Abstract

The centre of rotation of the hip can be displaced in hip dysplasia and revision arthroplasty. This study examined the effect of artificial femoral head load after acetabular component displacement in total hip arthroplasty. Sixteen total hip arthroplasty models of human cadaver specimens were reconstructed, and under different acetabular component position, the load around the femoral head was evaluated by strain gages. The results showed that the load was higher in the same specimens when the cup was moved 2 mm inward or upward, especially after the cup was moved more than 6 mm, and the load had an increasing effect in the inward group. In the upward group, an increasing effect happened at 8 mm upward displacement, but the stress value decreased from 4 mm to 6 mm upward displacement. In the same moving distance, the stress of inward displacement is obviously higher than upward displacement. Altogether, the results suggested that for both inward displacement and upward displacement of the acetabular cup, the load around the femoral head increased gradually, while the distance of the inward displacement and the superior displacement was increased. The greater the displacement, the bigger the loading contact stress. The upward displacement caused less stress change on the femoral head. The stress of the 6 mm upward position was lower than nearby positions; perhaps this site represented a stress buffering zone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19424694      PMCID: PMC2903137          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0788-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  20 in total

1.  Acetabular roof reconstruction with pedicled iliac graft.

Authors:  Domagoj Delimar; Nikola Cicak; Hrvoje Klobucar; Marko Pećina; Kresimir Korzinek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2002-07-04       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion.

Authors:  K-H Widmer; B Zurfluh
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Acetabular roof reconstruction with pedicled iliac graft: early clinical experience.

Authors:  D Delimar; G Bićanić; M Pećina; K Korzinek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Roentgenographic measurements after Müller total hip replacement. Correlations among roentgenographic measurements and hip strength and mobility.

Authors:  D R Gore; M P Murray; G M Gardner; S B Sepic
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Reconstruction of the hip. A mathematical approach to determine optimum geometric relationships.

Authors:  R C Johnston; R A Brand; R D Crowninshield
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Total hip replacement by low-friction arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Charnley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1970 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios.

Authors:  D D D'Lima; A G Urquhart; K O Buehler; R H Walker; C W Colwell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Polyethylene wear and acetabular component orientation.

Authors:  Shantanu Patil; Arnie Bergula; Peter C Chen; Clifford W Colwell; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Cementless hemispheric porous-coated sockets implanted with press-fit technique without screws: average ten-year follow-up.

Authors:  Pacharapol Udomkiat; Lawrence D Dorr; Zhinian Wan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Influence of the acetabular cup position on hip load during arthroplasty in hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Goran Bicanic; Domagoj Delimar; Marko Delimar; Marko Pecina
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cementless acetabular component with or without upward placement in dysplasia hip: Early results from a prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  Zhiqi Zhang; Peihui Wu; Zhiyu Huang; Baoxi Yu; Hong Sun; Ming Fu; Yan Kang; Weiming Liao
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-06-27

2.  A comparison of biomechanical changes on femoral head following rotational acetabular osteotomy and eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy in normal cadaveric hip.

Authors:  Ziqing Li; Shiming Yu; Changhe Hou; Yi Chen; Yangchun Zhang; Qiyi Zhai; Bo Bai; Puyi Sheng
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-01-10

3.  The biomechanical differences of rotational acetabular osteotomy, Chiari osteotomy and shelf procedure in developmental dysplasia of hip.

Authors:  Ming Fu; Shanshan Xiang; Zhiqi Zhang; Guangxin Huang; Jin Liu; Xin Duan; Zibo Yang; Peihui Wu; Weiming Liao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.362

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.