OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which select lower extremity alignment characteristics of the pelvis, hip, knee, and foot are related to the Q angle. DESIGN: Descriptive cohort study design. SETTING: Applied Neuromechanics Research Laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred eighteen participants (102 males, 116 females). ASSESSMENT OF RISK FACTORS: Eight clinical measures of static alignment of the left lower extremity were measured by a single examiner to determine the impact of lower extremity alignment on the magnitude of Q angle. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Q angle, pelvic angle, hip anteversion, tibiofemoral angle, genu recurvatum, tibial torsion, navicular drop, and femur and tibia length. RESULTS: Once all alignment variables were accounted for, greater tibiofemoral angle and femoral anteversion were significant predictors of greater Q angle in both males and females. Pelvic angle, genu recurvatum, tibial torsion, navicular drop, and femur to tibia length ratio were not significant independent predictors of Q angle in males or females. CONCLUSIONS: Greater femoral anteversion and tibiofemoral angle result in greater Q angle, with changes in tibiofemoral angle having a substantially greater impact on the magnitude of the Q angle compared with femoral anteversion. As such, the Q angle seems to largely represent a frontal plane alignment measure. As many knee injuries seem to result from a combination of both frontal and transverse plane motions and forces, this may in part explain why Q angle has been found to be a poor independent predictor of lower extremity injury risk.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which select lower extremity alignment characteristics of the pelvis, hip, knee, and foot are related to the Q angle. DESIGN: Descriptive cohort study design. SETTING: Applied Neuromechanics Research Laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred eighteen participants (102 males, 116 females). ASSESSMENT OF RISK FACTORS: Eight clinical measures of static alignment of the left lower extremity were measured by a single examiner to determine the impact of lower extremity alignment on the magnitude of Q angle. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Q angle, pelvic angle, hip anteversion, tibiofemoral angle, genu recurvatum, tibial torsion, navicular drop, and femur and tibia length. RESULTS: Once all alignment variables were accounted for, greater tibiofemoral angle and femoral anteversion were significant predictors of greater Q angle in both males and females. Pelvic angle, genu recurvatum, tibial torsion, navicular drop, and femur to tibia length ratio were not significant independent predictors of Q angle in males or females. CONCLUSIONS: Greater femoral anteversion and tibiofemoral angle result in greater Q angle, with changes in tibiofemoral angle having a substantially greater impact on the magnitude of the Q angle compared with femoral anteversion. As such, the Q angle seems to largely represent a frontal plane alignment measure. As many knee injuries seem to result from a combination of both frontal and transverse plane motions and forces, this may in part explain why Q angle has been found to be a poor independent predictor of lower extremity injury risk.
Authors: Sandra J Shultz; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Thomas C Windley; Anthony S Kulas; Timothy L Botic; Bruce D Beynnon Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 3.638
Authors: R D Carpenter; S Sigurdsson; S Zhao; Y Lu; G Eiriksdottir; G Sigurdsson; B Y Jonsson; S Prevrhal; T B Harris; K Siggeirsdottir; V Guðnason; T F Lang Journal: Bone Date: 2010-12-17 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Kimberly Shampain; Kara Gaetke-Udager; Jessica R Leschied; Nathaniel B Meyer; Matthew R Hammer; Keri L Denay; Corrie M Yablon Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2018-08-20 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Seyit Citaker; Defne Kaya; Inci Yuksel; Baran Yosmaoglu; John Nyland; Ozgur Ahmet Atay; Mahmut Nedim Doral Journal: Sports Health Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 3.843