Literature DB >> 19420330

Implantation and explantation of a wireless epiretinal retina implant device: observations during the EPIRET3 prospective clinical trial.

Gernot Roessler1, Thomas Laube, Claudia Brockmann, Thomas Kirschkamp, Babac Mazinani, Michael Goertz, Christian Koch, Ingo Krisch, Bernd Sellhaus, Hoc Khiem Trieu, Joachim Weis, Norbert Bornfeld, Harald Röthgen, Arthur Messner, Wilfried Mokwa, Peter Walter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Visual sensations in patients with blindness and retinal degenerations may be restored by electrical stimulation of retinal neurons with implantable microelectrode arrays. A prospective trial was initiated to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a wireless intraocular retinal implant (EPIRET3) in six volunteers with blindness and RP.
METHODS: The implant is a remotely controlled, fully intraocular wireless device consisting of a receiver and a stimulator module. The stimulator is placed on the retinal surface. Data and energy are transmitted via an inductive link from outside the eye to the implant. Surgery included removal of the lens, vitrectomy, and implantation of the EPIRET3 device through a corneal incision. The clinical outcome after implantation and explantation of the device was determined. The implant was removed after 4 weeks, according to the study protocol.
RESULTS: Implantation was successful in all six patients. While the anterior part was fixed with transscleral sutures, the stimulating foil was placed onto the posterior pole and fixed with retinal tacks. The implant was well tolerated, causing temporary moderate postoperative inflammation, whereas the position of the implant remained stable until surgical removal. In all cases explantation of the device was performed successfully. Adverse events were a sterile hypopyon effectively treated with steroids and antibiotics in one case and a retinal break in a second case during explantation requiring silicone oil surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The EPIRET3 system can be successfully implanted and explanted in patients with blindness and RP. The surgical steps are feasible, and the postoperative follow-up disclosed an acceptable range of adverse events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19420330     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-2752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  29 in total

1.  Repeated transchoroidal implantation and explantation of compound subretinal prostheses: an exploratory study in rabbits.

Authors:  Florian Gekeler; Karin Kobuch; Georgios Blatsios; Eberhart Zrenner; Kei Shinoda
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Surgical feasibility and biocompatibility of wide-field dual-array suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation prosthesis in middle-sized animals.

Authors:  Tibor Karl Lohmann; Hiroyuki Kanda; Takeshi Morimoto; Takao Endo; Tomomitsu Miyoshi; Kentaro Nishida; Motohiro Kamei; Peter Walter; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Implantation and explantation of an active epiretinal visual prosthesis: 2-year follow-up data from the EPIRET3 prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  J Menzel-Severing; T Laube; C Brockmann; N Bornfeld; W Mokwa; B Mazinani; P Walter; G Roessler
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Development of surgical techniques for implantation of a wireless intraocular epiretinal retina implant in Göttingen minipigs.

Authors:  Thomas Laube; Claudia Brockmann; Gernot Roessler; Peter Walter; Christine Krueger; Michael Goertz; Susanne Klauke; Norbert Bornfeld
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  Retinal implants: emergence of a multidisciplinary field.

Authors:  Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.710

6.  The Detection of Motion by Blind Subjects With the Epiretinal 60-Electrode (Argus II) Retinal Prosthesis.

Authors:  Jessy D Dorn; Ashish K Ahuja; Avi Caspi; Lyndon da Cruz; Gislin Dagnelie; Jose-Alain Sahel; Robert J Greenberg; Matthew J McMahon
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.389

Review 7.  Retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  James D Weiland; Mark S Humayun
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Development of a surgical approach for a wide-view suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis: evaluation of implantation trauma.

Authors:  Joel Villalobos; Penelope J Allen; Mark F McCombe; Meera Ulaganathan; Ehud Zamir; David C Ng; Robert K Shepherd; Chris E Williams
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Assessment of Postoperative Morphologic Retinal Changes by Optical Coherence Tomography in Recipients of an Electronic Retinal Prosthesis Implant.

Authors:  Stanislao Rizzo; Laura Cinelli; Lucia Finocchio; Ruggero Tartaro; Francesca Santoro; Ninel Z Gregori
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 7.389

Review 10.  [Visual prostheses].

Authors:  P Walter
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.