OBJECTIVE: To investigate the ability of 28 blind subjects implanted with a 60-electrode Argus II (Second Sight Medical Products Inc) retinal prosthesis system to detect the direction of a moving object. METHODS: Blind subjects (bare light perception or worse in both eyes) with retinitis pigmentosa were implanted with the Argus II prosthesis as part of a phase 1/2 feasibility study at multiple clinical sites worldwide. The experiment measured their ability to detect the direction of motion of a high-contrast moving bar on a flatscreen monitor in 3 conditions: with the prosthesis system on and a 1-to-1 mapping of spatial information, with the system off, and with the system on but with randomly scrambled spatial information. RESULTS: Fifteen subjects (54%) were able to perform the task significantly better with their prosthesis system than they were with their residual vision, 2 subjects had significantly better performance with their residual vision, and no difference was found for 11 subjects. Of the 15 better-performing subjects, 11 were available for follow-up testing, and 10 of them had significantly better performance with normal rather than with scrambled spatial information. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates that blind subjects implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis were able to perform a motion detection task they could not do with their native vision, confirming that electrical stimulation of the retina provides spatial information from synchronized activation of multiple electrodes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT00407602
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the ability of 28 blind subjects implanted with a 60-electrode Argus II (Second Sight Medical Products Inc) retinal prosthesis system to detect the direction of a moving object. METHODS: Blind subjects (bare light perception or worse in both eyes) with retinitis pigmentosa were implanted with the Argus II prosthesis as part of a phase 1/2 feasibility study at multiple clinical sites worldwide. The experiment measured their ability to detect the direction of motion of a high-contrast moving bar on a flatscreen monitor in 3 conditions: with the prosthesis system on and a 1-to-1 mapping of spatial information, with the system off, and with the system on but with randomly scrambled spatial information. RESULTS: Fifteen subjects (54%) were able to perform the task significantly better with their prosthesis system than they were with their residual vision, 2 subjects had significantly better performance with their residual vision, and no difference was found for 11 subjects. Of the 15 better-performing subjects, 11 were available for follow-up testing, and 10 of them had significantly better performance with normal rather than with scrambled spatial information. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates that blind subjects implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis were able to perform a motion detection task they could not do with their native vision, confirming that electrical stimulation of the retina provides spatial information from synchronized activation of multiple electrodes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT00407602
Authors: J F Rizzo; J Wyatt; M Humayun; E de Juan; W Liu; A Chow; R Eckmiller; E Zrenner; T Yagi; G Abrams Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Douglas Yanai; James D Weiland; Manjunatha Mahadevappa; Robert J Greenberg; Ione Fine; Mark S Humayun Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2007-03-23 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Gernot Roessler; Thomas Laube; Claudia Brockmann; Thomas Kirschkamp; Babac Mazinani; Michael Goertz; Christian Koch; Ingo Krisch; Bernd Sellhaus; Hoc Khiem Trieu; Joachim Weis; Norbert Bornfeld; Harald Röthgen; Arthur Messner; Wilfried Mokwa; Peter Walter Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-05-06 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Mark S Humayun; Jessy D Dorn; Lyndon da Cruz; Gislin Dagnelie; José-Alain Sahel; Paulo E Stanga; Artur V Cideciyan; Jacque L Duncan; Dean Eliott; Eugene Filley; Allen C Ho; Arturo Santos; Avinoam B Safran; Aries Arditi; Lucian V Del Priore; Robert J Greenberg Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-01-11 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: E Zrenner; A Stett; S Weiss; R B Aramant; E Guenther; K Kohler; K D Miliczek; M J Seiler; H Haemmerle Journal: Vision Res Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 1.886
Authors: D Besch; H Sachs; P Szurman; D Gülicher; R Wilke; S Reinert; E Zrenner; K U Bartz-Schmidt; F Gekeler Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2008-07-28 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Lyndon da Cruz; Jessy D Dorn; Mark S Humayun; Gislin Dagnelie; James Handa; Pierre-Olivier Barale; José-Alain Sahel; Paulo E Stanga; Farhad Hafezi; Avinoam B Safran; Joel Salzmann; Arturo Santos; David Birch; Rand Spencer; Artur V Cideciyan; Eugene de Juan; Jacque L Duncan; Dean Eliott; Amani Fawzi; Lisa C Olmos de Koo; Allen C Ho; Gary Brown; Julia Haller; Carl Regillo; Lucian V Del Priore; Aries Arditi; Robert J Greenberg Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Young Jun Yoon; Jae-Ik Lee; Ye Ji Jang; Seungki An; Jae Hun Kim; Shelley I Fried; Maesoon Im Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 3.802