BACKGROUND: Our research goal is to develop a safe, reproducible surgical approach for implantation of a wide-field retinal stimulating array. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pathological response to acute implantation of a functional prototype electrode array in the suprachoroidal space. METHODS: The surgical techniques to implant a 72 platinum electrode array fabricated on 8 × 13 × 0.4 mm polyimide and silicone substrate were developed in a pilot study in anesthetized cats. For the main study, nine eyes were implanted in vivo and unoperated eyes were used as controls. Surgery consisted of a temporal approach with a full-thickness scleral incision 5 mm posterior to the limbus. A suprachoroidal "pocket" was created, the electrode array inserted to sit beneath the area centralis, and placement was confirmed visually. The eyes were collected subsequently for histopathology. RESULTS: The array was consistently inserted into the suprachoroidal space beneath the area centralis in nine eyes. There was a significant hemorrhage in two cases where implantation was complicated by choroidal congestion. Retinal folding occurred only when the array tip was within 2.6 mm of the optic disc (p < 0.01). There was choroidal incarceration at the incision in six eyes and scleral distortion at the array edges in five. No cases were found where the implant breached the retina, choroid, or sclera. CONCLUSIONS: A large stimulation array can be reliably inserted into the suprachoroidal space without trauma to the neuroretina. These findings suggest that this is an appropriate surgical approach for the placement of an electrode array for use in retinal stimulation.
BACKGROUND: Our research goal is to develop a safe, reproducible surgical approach for implantation of a wide-field retinal stimulating array. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pathological response to acute implantation of a functional prototype electrode array in the suprachoroidal space. METHODS: The surgical techniques to implant a 72 platinum electrode array fabricated on 8 × 13 × 0.4 mm polyimide and silicone substrate were developed in a pilot study in anesthetized cats. For the main study, nine eyes were implanted in vivo and unoperated eyes were used as controls. Surgery consisted of a temporal approach with a full-thickness scleral incision 5 mm posterior to the limbus. A suprachoroidal "pocket" was created, the electrode array inserted to sit beneath the area centralis, and placement was confirmed visually. The eyes were collected subsequently for histopathology. RESULTS: The array was consistently inserted into the suprachoroidal space beneath the area centralis in nine eyes. There was a significant hemorrhage in two cases where implantation was complicated by choroidal congestion. Retinal folding occurred only when the array tip was within 2.6 mm of the optic disc (p < 0.01). There was choroidal incarceration at the incision in six eyes and scleral distortion at the array edges in five. No cases were found where the implant breached the retina, choroid, or sclera. CONCLUSIONS: A large stimulation array can be reliably inserted into the suprachoroidal space without trauma to the neuroretina. These findings suggest that this is an appropriate surgical approach for the placement of an electrode array for use in retinal stimulation.
Authors: Mohit N Shivdasani; Chi D Luu; Rosemary Cicione; James B Fallon; Penny J Allen; James Leuenberger; Gregg J Suaning; Nigel H Lovell; Robert K Shepherd; Chris E Williams Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2010-05-18 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Yasuyuki Yamauchi; Luisa M Franco; Douglas J Jackson; John F Naber; R Ofer Ziv; Joseph F Rizzo; Henry J Kaplan; Volker Enzmann Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2005-02-22 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Eberhart Zrenner; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Heval Benav; Dorothea Besch; Anna Bruckmann; Veit-Peter Gabel; Florian Gekeler; Udo Greppmaier; Alex Harscher; Steffen Kibbel; Johannes Koch; Akos Kusnyerik; Tobias Peters; Katarina Stingl; Helmut Sachs; Alfred Stett; Peter Szurman; Barbara Wilhelm; Robert Wilke Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2010-11-03 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: Kyle D Slater; Nicholas C Sinclair; Timothy S Nelson; Peter J Blamey; Hugh J McDermott Journal: IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Date: 2015-07-13 Impact factor: 3.316
Authors: David A X Nayagam; Richard A Williams; Penelope J Allen; Mohit N Shivdasani; Chi D Luu; Cesar M Salinas-LaRosa; Sue Finch; Lauren N Ayton; Alexia L Saunders; Michelle McPhedran; Ceara McGowan; Joel Villalobos; James B Fallon; Andrew K Wise; Jonathan Yeoh; Jin Xu; Helen Feng; Rodney Millard; Melanie McWade; Patrick C Thien; Chris E Williams; Robert K Shepherd Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-05-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lauren N Ayton; Peter J Blamey; Robyn H Guymer; Chi D Luu; David A X Nayagam; Nicholas C Sinclair; Mohit N Shivdasani; Jonathan Yeoh; Mark F McCombe; Robert J Briggs; Nicholas L Opie; Joel Villalobos; Peter N Dimitrov; Mary Varsamidis; Matthew A Petoe; Chris D McCarthy; Janine G Walker; Nick Barnes; Anthony N Burkitt; Chris E Williams; Robert K Shepherd; Penelope J Allen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alexia L Saunders; Chris E Williams; Wilson Heriot; Robert Briggs; Jonthan Yeoh; David A X Nayagam; Mark McCombe; Joel Villalobos; Owen Burns; Chi D Luu; Lauren N Ayton; Michelle McPhedran; Nicholas L Opie; Ceara McGowan; Robert K Shepherd; Robyn Guymer; Penelope J Allen Journal: Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2014-02-07 Impact factor: 4.207
Authors: David A X Nayagam; Ceara McGowan; Joel Villalobos; Richard A Williams; Cesar Salinas-LaRosa; Penny McKelvie; Irene Lo; Meri Basa; Justin Tan; Chris E Williams Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2013-08-02 Impact factor: 1.355