Literature DB >> 19417714

Findings from the Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) Study.

Marjean Taylor Kulp.   

Abstract

The Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) Study Group conducted a multicenter, multidisciplinary, two-phase study to evaluate the performance of vision screening tests for identifying pre-school children with amblyopia, strabismus, significant refractive error, or unexplained reduced visual acuity (VA). The results of the VIP Study provide evidence-based guidelines for preschool vision screening. The best screening tests administered by eye care professionals were non-cycloplegic retinoscopy, Retinomax Autorefractor, SureSight Vision Screener, and linear, crowded Lea Symbols VA at 10 feet. The best screening tests administered by trained nurses and/or lay screeners were Retinomax, SureSight, and VIP single, crowded Lea Symbols VA screening test system at 5 feet. Eye care professionals can improve detection of strabismus by combining unilateral cover test with a refraction test and trained lay screeners can improve detection of strabismus by combining Stereo Smile II with SureSight. The best performing tests had high testability whether performed by trained eye care professionals, nurses, or lay screeners (>or=98%). Although very few children were unable to complete these tests, a child who was "unable" was much more likely to have a vision problem than a child who passed; therefore, children who are unable to complete one of these tests should be referred for further evaluation. When screening using the Retinomax, repeated testing to achieve the manufacturer's suggested confidence number is valuable and improves specificity. Federal initiatives to increase the number of pre-school children receiving vision screening or examination will increase the number of pre-school children identified with amblyopia, strabismus, and/or significant refractive error. Although there is general agreement regarding the importance of early detection of amblyopia, controversy exists regarding the importance of early detection of refractive error. Because of the high prevalence of significant refractive errors and lack of evidenced-based guidelines for correction of refractive error in pre-school children, future research is needed to evaluate the value of correcting refractive errors in preschoolers who do not have amblyopia and/or strabismus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19417714      PMCID: PMC2806243          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181a59bf5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  26 in total

Review 1.  Preschool vision screening: summary of a Task Force report. Behalf of the Maternal and Child Health Bureau and the National Eye Institute Task Force on Vision Screening in the Preschool Child.

Authors:  E E Hartmann; V Dobson; L Hainline; W Marsh-Tootle; G E Quinn; M S Ruttum; P P Schmidt; K Simons
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Screening for visual impairment in children younger than age 5 years: recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  A look at the reality of spectacles being prescribed in "normal" preschool children.

Authors:  Steven J Lichtenstein
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  Comparison of visual characteristics in children with and without learning difficulties.

Authors:  J Rosner; J Rosner
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1987-07

5.  Diagnosis and treatment of strabismus disorders.

Authors:  J B Lavrich; L B Nelson
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.278

6.  Vision screening in children. U.S. Public Health Service.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  1994-09-01       Impact factor: 3.292

7.  Strabismus. I. A summary of 1,110 consecutive cases.

Authors:  M C Fletcher; S J Silverman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study.

Authors:  Paulette Schmidt; Maureen Maguire; Velma Dobson; Graham Quinn; Elise Ciner; Lynn Cyert; Marjean Taylor Kulp; Bruce Moore; Deborah Orel-Bixler; Maryann Redford; Gui-shuang Ying
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Preschool visual acuity screening with HOTV and Lea symbols: testability and between-test agreement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Eye care for the children of America: The American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.402

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Why do only some hyperopes become strabismic?

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Comparison of non-cycloplegic photorefraction, cycloplegic photorefraction and cycloplegic retinoscopy in children.

Authors:  Ozdemir Ozdemir; Zuhal Özen Tunay; Ikbal Seza Petriçli; Damla Ergintürk Acar; Muhammet Kazım Erol
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  The accommodative lag of the young hyperopic patient.

Authors:  T Rowan Candy; Kathryn H Gray; Christy C Hohenbary; Don W Lyon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Stereoacuity of preschool children with and without vision disorders.

Authors:  Elise B Ciner; Gui-Shuang Ying; Marjean Taylor Kulp; Maureen G Maguire; Graham E Quinn; Deborah Orel-Bixler; Lynn A Cyert; Bruce Moore; Jiayan Huang
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Utility of an open field Shack-Hartmann aberrometer for measurement of refractive error in infants and young children.

Authors:  Erin M Harvey; Joseph M Miller; Jim Schwiegerling
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.220

6.  Test Re-Test Reliability and Validity of Different Visual Acuity and Stereoacuity Charts Used in Preschool Children.

Authors:  Diana Moganeswari; Jyothi Thomas; Krithica Srinivasan; George P Jacob
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-11-01

7.  Authors' response.

Authors:  Elise B Ciner; Gui-Shuang Ying; Marjean Taylor Kulp; Maureen G Maguire; Graham E Quinn; Deborah Orel-Bixler; Lynn A Cyert; Bruce Moore; Jiayan Huang
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 8.  Vision Screening, Vision Disorders, and Impacts of Hyperopia in Young Children: Outcomes of the Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) and Vision in Preschoolers - Hyperopia in Preschoolers (VIP-HIP) Studies.

Authors:  Marjean Taylor Kulp; Elise Ciner; Gui-Shuang Ying; T Rowan Candy; Bruce D Moore; Deborah Orel-Bixler
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2022-01-18

9.  Is noncycloplegic photorefraction applicable for screening refractive amblyopia risk factors?

Authors:  Zhale Rajavi; Hiva Parsafar; Alireza Ramezani; Mehdi Yaseri
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2012-01

10.  Validation of the Pediatric Vision Scanner in a normal preschool population.

Authors:  Shaival S Shah; Jennifer J Jimenez; Emily J Rozema; Miki T Nguyen; Melissa Preciado; Ashish M Mehta
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 1.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.