BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We compare the pharmacological profiles of a new histamine H4 receptor agonist 2-(2-guanidinoethyl)isothiourea (VUF 8430) with that of a previously described H4 receptor agonist, 4-methylhistamine. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Radioligand binding and functional assays were performed using histamine H4 receptors expressed in mammalian cell lines. Compounds were also evaluated ex vivo in monocyte-derived dendritic cells endogenously expressing H4 receptors and in vivo in anaesthetized rats for gastric acid secretion activity. KEY RESULTS: Both VUF 8430 and 4-methylhistamine were full agonists at human H4 receptors with lower affinity at rat and mouse H4 receptors. Both compounds induced chemotaxis of monocyte-derived dendritic cells. VUF 8430 also showed reasonable affinity and was a full agonist at the H3 receptor. Agmatine is a metabolite of arginine, structurally related to VUF 8430, and was a H4 receptor agonist with micromolar affinity. At histamine H3 receptors, agmatine was a full agonist, whereas 4-methylhistamine was an agonist only at high concentrations. Both VUF 8430 and agmatine were inactive at H1 and H2 receptors, whereas 4-methylhistamine is as active as histamine at H2 receptors. In vivo, VUF 8430 only caused a weak secretion of gastric acid mediated by H2 receptors, whereas 4-methylhistamine, dimaprit, histamine and amthamine, at equimolar doses, induced 2.5- to 6-fold higher output than VUF 8430. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our results suggest complementary use of 4-methylhistamine and VUF 8430 as H4 receptor agonists. Along with H4 receptor antagonists, both agonists can serve as useful pharmacological tools in studies of histamine H4 receptors.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We compare the pharmacological profiles of a new histamine H4 receptor agonist 2-(2-guanidinoethyl)isothiourea (VUF 8430) with that of a previously described H4 receptor agonist, 4-methylhistamine. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Radioligand binding and functional assays were performed using histamine H4 receptors expressed in mammalian cell lines. Compounds were also evaluated ex vivo in monocyte-derived dendritic cells endogenously expressing H4 receptors and in vivo in anaesthetized rats for gastric acid secretion activity. KEY RESULTS: Both VUF 8430 and 4-methylhistamine were full agonists at human H4 receptors with lower affinity at rat and mouse H4 receptors. Both compounds induced chemotaxis of monocyte-derived dendritic cells. VUF 8430 also showed reasonable affinity and was a full agonist at the H3 receptor. Agmatine is a metabolite of arginine, structurally related to VUF 8430, and was a H4 receptor agonist with micromolar affinity. At histamine H3 receptors, agmatine was a full agonist, whereas 4-methylhistamine was an agonist only at high concentrations. Both VUF 8430 and agmatine were inactive at H1 and H2 receptors, whereas 4-methylhistamine is as active as histamine at H2 receptors. In vivo, VUF 8430 only caused a weak secretion of gastric acid mediated by H2 receptors, whereas 4-methylhistamine, dimaprit, histamine and amthamine, at equimolar doses, induced 2.5- to 6-fold higher output than VUF 8430. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our results suggest complementary use of 4-methylhistamine and VUF 8430 as H4 receptor agonists. Along with H4 receptor antagonists, both agonists can serve as useful pharmacological tools in studies of histamine H4 receptors.
Authors: K L Morse; J Behan; T M Laz; R E West; S A Greenfeder; J C Anthes; S Umland; Y Wan; R W Hipkin; W Gonsiorek; N Shin; E L Gustafson; X Qiao; S Wang; J A Hedrick; J Greene; M Bayne; F J Monsma Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: C Liu; X Ma; X Jiang; S J Wilson; C L Hofstra; J Blevitt; J Pyati; X Li; W Chai; N Carruthers; T W Lovenberg Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Y Zhu; D Michalovich; H Wu; K B Tan; G M Dytko; I J Mannan; R Boyce; J Alston; L A Tierney; X Li; N C Herrity; L Vawter; H M Sarau; R S Ames; C M Davenport; J P Hieble; S Wilson; D J Bergsma; L R Fitzgerald Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Florian Gantner; Katsuya Sakai; Michael W Tusche; William W Cruikshank; David M Center; Kevin B Bacon Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Diego J Martinel Lamas; Maximo Croci; Eliana Carabajal; Ernesto J V Crescenti; Lorena Sambuco; Noelia A Massari; Rosa M Bergoc; Elena S Rivera; Vanina A Medina Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: A C Rosa; C Grange; A Pini; M A Katebe; E Benetti; M Collino; G Miglio; D Bani; G Camussi; P L Chazot; R Fantozzi Journal: Inflamm Res Date: 2012-12-22 Impact factor: 4.575