Literature DB >> 24461220

Development of an orthopedic surgery trauma patient handover checklist.

Justin LeBlanc1, Tyrone Donnon2, Carol Hutchison3, Paul Duffy3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In surgery, preoperative handover of surgical trauma patients is a process that must be made as safe as possible. We sought to determine vital clinical information to be transferred between patient care teams and to develop a standardized handover checklist.
METHODS: We conducted standardized small-group interviews about trauma patient handover. Based on this information, we created a questionnaire to gather perspectives from all Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA) members about which topics they felt would be most important on a handover checklist. We analyzed the responses to develop a standardized handover checklist.
RESULTS: Of the 1106 COA members, 247 responded to the questionnaire. The top 7 topics felt to be most important for achieving patient safety in the handover were comorbidities, diagnosis, readiness for the operating room, stability, associated injuries, history/mechanism of injury and outstanding issues. The expert recommendations were to have handover completed the same way every day, all appropriate radiographs available, adequate time, all appropriate laboratory work and more time to spend with patients with more severe illness.
CONCLUSION: Our main recommendations for safe handover are to use standardized checklists specific to the patient and site needs. We provide an example of a standardized checklist that should be used for preoperative handovers. To our knowledge, this is the first checklist for handover developed by a group of experts in orthopedic surgery, which is both manageable in length and simple to use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24461220      PMCID: PMC3908989          DOI: 10.1503/cjs.025912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  42 in total

1.  Inadequate pre-operative evaluation and preparation: a review of 197 reports from the Australian incident monitoring study.

Authors:  M T Kluger; E J Tham; N A Coleman; W B Runciman; M F Bullock
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip or knee arthroplasty: findings from a 2008 survey of US orthopedic surgeons.

Authors:  Frederick A Anderson; Wei Huang; Richard J Friedman; Louis M Kwong; Jay R Lieberman; Vincent D Pellegrini
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Physicians' perceptions of the definition of major bleeding in major orthopedic surgery: results of an international survey.

Authors:  Enrique Ginzburg; Franck Dujardin
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  A description of handover processes in an Australian public hospital.

Authors:  David T Bomba; Robert Prakash
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  Transfer of accountability: transforming shift handover to enhance patient safety.

Authors:  Kim Alvarado; Ruth Lee; Emily Christoffersen; Nancy Fram; Sheryl Boblin; Nancy Poole; Janie Lucas; Shirley Forsyth
Journal:  Healthc Q       Date:  2006

6.  Standardized multidisciplinary protocol improves handover of cardiac surgery patients to the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Brian F Joy; Emily Elliott; Courtney Hardy; Christine Sullivan; Carl L Backer; Jason M Kane
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.624

7.  Impact of a new electronic handover system in surgery.

Authors:  S Ryan; J M O'Riordan; S Tierney; K C Conlon; P F Ridgway
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 6.071

8.  Nurse practitioner-based sign-out system to facilitate patient communication on a neurosurgical service: a pilot study with recommendations.

Authors:  Deborah L Rabinovitch; Melinda Hamill; Clauda Zanchetta; Mark Bernstein
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.230

9.  The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992.

Authors:  A A Gawande; E J Thomas; M J Zinner; T A Brennan
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Patient handover from surgery to intensive care: using Formula 1 pit-stop and aviation models to improve safety and quality.

Authors:  Ken R Catchpole; Marc R de Leval; Angus McEwan; Nick Pigott; Martin J Elliott; Annette McQuillan; Carol MacDonald; Allan J Goldman
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.556

View more
  6 in total

1.  What would I want for my surgery?

Authors:  Marlies van Dijk
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Process improvement in surgery.

Authors:  Edward J Harvey
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Implementation of a surgical handover tool in a busy tertiary referral centre: a complete audit cycle.

Authors:  J P Gibbons; E Nugent; S Tierney; D Kavanagh
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  CHAracteristics of research studies that iNfluence practice: a GEneral survey of Canadian orthopaedic Surgeons (CHANGES): a pilot survey.

Authors:  Patrick Thornley; Nathan Evaniew; Kim Madden; Mohit Bhandari; Michelle Ghert; Darren de Sa
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-02-05

5.  Sustained Improvement in Quality of Patient Handoffs After Orthopaedic Surgery I-PASS Intervention.

Authors:  Derek S Stenquist; Caleb M Yeung; Hannah J Szapary; Laura Rossi; Antonia F Chen; Mitchel B Harris
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2022-09-06

6.  Handover checklist: testing a standardization process in an Italian hospital.

Authors:  Davide Ferorelli; Teresa Giandola; Mariangela Laterza; Biagio Solarino; Angela Pezzolla; Fiorenza Zotti; Alessandro Dell'Erba
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2017-05-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.