Literature DB >> 19405873

Genetic testing of stored biological samples: views of 570 U.S. workers.

Jinger G Hoop1, Laura Weiss Roberts, Katherine A Green Hammond.   

Abstract

AIMS: Storing tissue samples for future genetic testing raises practical and ethical issues regarding informed consent and confidentiality. Employed adults' views on this are uniquely valuable but have been little studied.
METHODS: This study surveyed 570 employees at a U.S. defense laboratory and an academic medical center regarding their willingness to have tissue stored for future genetic testing, interest in receiving results of future testing and being contacted for consent for future testing, and acceptability of various tissue-storage options.
RESULTS: Respondents were somewhat interested in providing samples and significantly less interested in providing traceable samples than untraceable samples. Workers with concerns about having a genetic illness were more interested in providing tissue for future testing. Most participants expressed strong desire to be asked before future genotyping and to receive those test results. Respondents preferred that tissue samples be stored with their doctor, local medical facility, or local research university rather than with their employer, a government agency, or an insurance company.
CONCLUSIONS: Employed adults valued future genetic testing as being important to their well-being and strongly preferred reconsenting for future use of stored tissue. These data provide a baseline to measure potential changes in workers' attitudes since the passage of the U.S. Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act in 2008.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19405873     DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2008.0117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers        ISSN: 1945-0257


  10 in total

1.  Considerations in the construction of an instrument to assess attitudes regarding critical illness gene variation research.

Authors:  Bradley D Freeman; Carie R Kennedy; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Alexander Eastman; Ellen Iverson; Erica Shehane; Aaron Celious; Jennifer Barillas; Brian Clarridge
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Attitudes Regarding Enrollment in a Genetic Research Project: An Informed Consent Simulation Study Comparing Views of People With Depression, Diabetes, and Neither Condition.

Authors:  Jane Paik Kim; Katie Ryan; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  "Just tell me what's going on": The views of parents of children with genetic conditions regarding the research use of their child's electronic health record.

Authors:  Sara M Andrews; Melissa Raspa; Anne Edwards; Rebecca Moultrie; Lauren Turner-Brown; Laura Wagner; Alexandra Alvarez Rivas; Mary Katherine Frisch; Anne C Wheeler
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Ethical issues in mental health research: the case for community engagement.

Authors:  James M Dubois; Brendolyn Bailey-Burch; Dan Bustillos; Jean Campbell; Linda Cottler; Celia B Fisher; Whitney B Hadley; Jinger G Hoop; Laura Roberts; Erica K Salter; Joan E Sieber; Richard D Stevenson
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.741

5.  Perceptions of tissue storage in a dementia population among spouses and offspring.

Authors:  Megan M Martin; Erin W Rothwell; Vickie L Venne; Norman L Foster
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Juli Murphy-Bollinger; Joan Scott; Kathy L Hudson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Preferences for Accessing Electronic Health Records for Research Purposes: Views of Parents Who Have a Child With a Known or Suspected Genetic Condition.

Authors:  Melissa Raspa; Ryan S Paquin; Derek S Brown; Sara Andrews; Anne Edwards; Rebecca Moultrie; Laura Wagner; MaryKate Frisch; Lauren Turner-Brown; Anne C Wheeler
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 8.  Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues Related to the Inclusion of Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities in Electronic Health Record Research: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Melissa Raspa; Rebecca Moultrie; Laura Wagner; Anne Edwards; Sara Andrews; Mary Katherine Frisch; Lauren Turner-Brown; Anne Wheeler
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  The Impact of Communicating Uncertainty on Public Responses to Precision Medicine Research.

Authors:  Chelsea L Ratcliff; Bob Wong; Jakob D Jensen; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2021-10-27

10.  A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States.

Authors:  Nanibaa' A Garrison; Nila A Sathe; Armand H Matheny Antommaria; Ingrid A Holm; Saskia C Sanderson; Maureen E Smith; Melissa L McPheeters; Ellen W Clayton
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 8.822

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.