Literature DB >> 26742753

The time course of visual influences in letter recognition.

Sylvain Madec1, Kévin Le Goff1, Stéphanie K Riès2, Thierry Legou3,4, Guillaume Rousselet5, Pierre Courrieu1, F-Xavier Alario1,4, Jonathan Grainger1,4, Arnaud Rey6,7.   

Abstract

This study builds on a specific characteristic of letters of the Roman alphabet-namely, that each letter name is associated with two visual formats, corresponding to their uppercase and lowercase versions. Participants had to read aloud the names of single letters, and event-related potentials (ERPs) for six pairs of visually dissimilar upper- and lowercase letters were recorded. Assuming that the end product of processing is the same for upper- and lowercase letters sharing the same vocal response, ERPs were compared backward, starting from the onset of articulatory responses, and the first significant divergence was observed 120 ms before response onset. Given that naming responses were produced at around 414 ms, on average, these results suggest that letter processing is influenced by visual information until 294 ms after stimulus onset. This therefore provides new empirical evidence regarding the time course and interactive nature of visual letter perception processes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Event-related potentials; Letter processing; Visual perception

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26742753     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-015-0400-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  38 in total

Review 1.  The human visual cortex.

Authors:  Kalanit Grill-Spector; Rafael Malach
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Removal of muscle artifacts from EEG recordings of spoken language production.

Authors:  Maarten De Vos; De Maarten Vos; Stephanie Riès; Katrien Vanderperren; Bart Vanrumste; Francois-Xavier Alario; Sabine Van Huffel; Van Sabine Huffel; Boris Burle
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2010-06

3.  An early electrophysiological response associated with expertise in letter perception.

Authors:  Alan C N Wong; Isabel Gauthier; Brion Woroch; Casey DeBuse; Tim Curran
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Untangling invariant object recognition.

Authors:  James J DiCarlo; David D Cox
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  A masked priming ERP study of letter processing using single letters and false fonts.

Authors:  Priya Mitra; Donna Coch
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  On letter frequency effects.

Authors:  Boris New; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2011-08-19

7.  VARIETIES OF PURE ALEXIA: THE CASE OF FAILURE TO ACCESS GRAPHEMIC REPRESENTATIONS.

Authors:  Michele Miozzo; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The similarity structure of distributed neural responses reveals the multiple representations of letters.

Authors:  David Rothlein; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  LIMO EEG: a toolbox for hierarchical LInear MOdeling of ElectroEncephaloGraphic data.

Authors:  Cyril R Pernet; Nicolas Chauveau; Carl Gaspar; Guillaume A Rousselet
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-21

10.  Response-locked brain dynamics of word production.

Authors:  Stéphanie Riès; Niels Janssen; Borís Burle; F-Xavier Alario
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.