Literature DB >> 19403896

Anticipatory reconfiguration elicited by fully and partially informative cues that validly predict a switch in task.

Frini Karayanidis1, Elise L Mansfield, Kasey L Galloway, Janette L Smith, Alexander Provost, Andrew Heathcote.   

Abstract

Task-switching studies show no behavioral benefit of partially informative cues. However, ERP evidence of an early cue-locked positivity elicited by both fully and partially informative cues suggests that both cues trigger an anticipatory component of task set reconfiguration (Nicholson, Karayanidis, Davies, & Michie, 2006). We examined this apparent discrepancy using a cued-trials task-switching paradigm with three tasks. The ERP finding of an early cue-locked positivity was replicated for both switch-to cues, which validly predicted an upcoming switch trial and specified the new task set, and switch-away cues, which validly predicted an upcoming switch trial but not the new task set. This component was not elicited by a noninformative cue that did not specify whether the task would switch or repeat. Switch-away cues resulted in more accurate but not faster responding than did noninformative cues. Modeling of decision processes confirmed a speed-accuracy trade-off between these conditions and a preparation benefit for both switch-to and switch-away cues. These results indicate that both fully and partially informative cues elicit an early anticipatory component of task set reconfiguration that is reflected in the early cue-locked positivity. We argue that the pattern of results is most consistent with a task set inhibition account of this early anticipatory component of task set reconfiguration.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19403896     DOI: 10.3758/CABN.9.2.202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  25 in total

1.  Changing internal constraints on action: the role of backward inhibition.

Authors:  U Mayr; S W Keele
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-03

Review 2.  Artifact correction of the ongoing EEG using spatial filters based on artifact and brain signal topographies.

Authors:  Nicole Ille; Patrick Berg; Michael Scherg
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.177

3.  ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues.

Authors:  Rebecca Nicholson; Frini Karayanidis; Elizabeth Bumak; Dane Poboka; Patricia T Michie
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Components of task-set reconfiguration: differential effects of 'switch-to' and 'switch-away' cues.

Authors:  Rebecca Nicholson; Frini Karayanidis; Anna Davies; Patricia T Michie
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects?

Authors:  Catherine M Arrington; Gordon D Logan; Darryl W Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  EZ does it! Extensions of the EZ-diffusion model.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Han L J van der Maas; Conor V Dolan; Raoul P P P Grasman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-12

7.  The EZ diffusion method: too EZ?

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-12

8.  Mechanisms of spatial attention: the relation of macrostructure to microstructure in parietal neglect.

Authors:  J D Cohen; R D Romero; D Servan-Schreiber; M J Farah
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; J Corwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

10.  The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: a multivariate solution.

Authors:  M W Vasey; J F Thayer
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  The many faces of preparatory control in task switching: reviewing a decade of fMRI research.

Authors:  Hannes Ruge; Sharna Jamadar; Uta Zimmermann; Frini Karayanidis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  The importance of decision onset.

Authors:  Tobias Teichert; Jack Grinband; Vincent Ferrera
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Effects of aging in a task-switch paradigm with the diffusion decision model.

Authors:  Nadja R Ging-Jehli; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2020-07-27

4.  "Smart inhibition": electrophysiological evidence for the suppression of conflict-generating task rules during task switching.

Authors:  Nachshon Meiran; Shulan Hsieh; Chi-Chih Chang
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Shifting the set of stimulus selection when switching between tasks.

Authors:  Mike Wendt; Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-07-27

6.  Increased cognitive control after task conflict? Investigating the N-3 effect in task switching.

Authors:  Stefanie Schuch; James A Grange
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-05-25

7.  Switch-related and general preparation processes in task-switching: evidence from multivariate pattern classification of EEG data.

Authors:  Elise L Mansfield; Frini Karayanidis; Michael X Cohen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Brain activity related to the ability to inhibit previous task sets: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Anson J Whitmer; Marie T Banich
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Local and global effects of motivation on cognitive control.

Authors:  Adam C Savine; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Immediate versus delayed control demands elicit distinct mechanisms for instantiating proactive control.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Janowich; James F Cavanagh
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.