| Literature DB >> 17010947 |
Rebecca Nicholson1, Frini Karayanidis, Anna Davies, Patricia T Michie.
Abstract
Preparation for a switch in task was manipulated using two types of switch cues: 'switch-away' from the previous task-set and 'switch-to' a different task-set. Increasing cue-stimulus interval resulted in a reduction in reaction time switch cost for switch-to trials only. Cue-locked difference waveforms for both switch-to and switch-away trials showed a large, broad differential positivity, relative to repeat waveforms. However, the later part of the differential positivity was significantly reduced on switch-away trials. A differential positivity then emerged after stimulus onset for switch-away trials only. This suggests that, with a long cue-stimulus interval, the new task-set was implemented before stimulus onset for switch-to trials, whereas on switch-away trials this process was delayed until after stimulus onset leading to increased switch cost. These results demonstrate dissociable effects of switching away from the current task-set and switching to the upcoming task-set and support the interpretation that the differential positivity observed for switch-to trials reflects processes associated with anticipatory task-set reconfiguration.Mesh:
Year: 2006 PMID: 17010947 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.101
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Res ISSN: 0006-8993 Impact factor: 3.252