Literature DB >> 16714004

ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues.

Rebecca Nicholson1, Frini Karayanidis, Elizabeth Bumak, Dane Poboka, Patricia T Michie.   

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that reaction time (RT) costs associated with switching tasks do not reflect an endogenous control process of task set reconfiguration [Logan, G. D., Bundesen, C., 2003. Clever Homunculus: Is There an Endogenous Act of Control in the Explicit Task-Cuing Procedure? J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 29 (3), 575-599]. Participants randomly switched between two simple tasks. Task was cued 600 ms prior to stimulus presentation using either a color or shape cue. A significant RT task switch cost was found when controlling for either a repeat or switch in cue category. In comparison, a switch in cue category had no effect on RT, even when examined across a cumulative distribution. Electrophysiological data revealed early cue processing effects within the first 300 ms after cue onset. However, replicating previous findings, an increased parietal positivity was found for task switch relative to task repeat trials that emerged prior to stimulus onset. This suggests that task set reconfiguration processes are activated when switching between tasks and supports the usefulness of task-switching paradigms in investigating cognitive control processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16714004     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  26 in total

1.  Anticipatory reconfiguration elicited by fully and partially informative cues that validly predict a switch in task.

Authors:  Frini Karayanidis; Elise L Mansfield; Kasey L Galloway; Janette L Smith; Alexander Provost; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  An investigation of the neural correlates of attention and effector switching using ERPs.

Authors:  Robert West; Kira Bailey; Moses M Langley
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Is task switching nothing but cue priming? Evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Kerstin Jost; Ulrich Mayr; Frank Rösler
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Preserved executive function in high-performing elderly is driven by large-scale recruitment of prefrontal cortical mechanisms.

Authors:  Pierfilippo De Sanctis; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Pejman Sehatpour; Glenn R Wylie; John J Foxe
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Are there control processes, and (if so) can they be studied?

Authors:  Glenn R Wylie; James F Sumowski; Micah Murray
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-29

6.  ERPs dissociate proactive and reactive control: evidence from a task-switching paradigm with informative and uninformative cues.

Authors:  Daniela Czernochowski
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  A new account of the effect of probability on task switching: ERP evidence following the manipulation of switch probability, cue informativeness and predictability.

Authors:  Doreen Nessler; David Friedman; Ray Johnson
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  Human EEG uncovers latent generalizable rule structure during learning.

Authors:  Anne G E Collins; James F Cavanagh; Michael J Frank
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The development of anticipatory cognitive control processes in task-switching: an ERP study in children, adolescents, and young adults.

Authors:  Alberto Manzi; Doreen Nessler; Daniela Czernochowski; David Friedman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Applying an attentional set to perceived and remembered features.

Authors:  Duncan Edward Astle; Anna Christina Nobre; Gaia Scerif
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.