Literature DB >> 21590505

"Smart inhibition": electrophysiological evidence for the suppression of conflict-generating task rules during task switching.

Nachshon Meiran1, Shulan Hsieh, Chi-Chih Chang.   

Abstract

A major challenge for task switching is maintaining a balance between high task readiness and effectively ignoring irrelevant task rules. This calls for finely tuned inhibition that targets only the source of interference without adversely influencing other task-related representations. The authors show that irrelevant task rules generating response conflict are inhibited, causing their inefficient execution on the next trial (indicating the presence of competitor rule suppression[CRS];Meiran, Hsieh, & Dimov, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 36, 992-1002, 2010). To determine whether CRS influences task rules, rather than target stimuli or responses, the authors focused on the processing of the task cue before the target stimulus was presented and before the response could be chosen. As was predicted, CRS was found in the event-related potentials in two time windows during task cue processing. It was also found in three time windows after target presentation. Source localization analyses suggest the involvement of the right dorsal prefrontal cortex in all five time windows.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21590505     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-011-0037-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  55 in total

1.  Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval.

Authors:  U Mayr; R Kliegl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Task switching: a high-density electrical mapping study.

Authors:  G R Wylie; D C Javitt; J J Foxe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Strategic control and medial frontal negativity: beyond errors and response conflict.

Authors:  Bruce D Bartholow; Melanie A Pearson; Cheryl L Dickter; Kenneth J Sher; Monica Fabiani; Gabriele Gratton
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-08

5.  Dynamics of task sets: evidence from dense-array event-related potentials.

Authors:  Catherine Poulsen; Phan Luu; Colin Davey; Don M Tucker
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-02-25

6.  Electrophysiological correlates of task conflicts in task-switching.

Authors:  Shulan Hsieh; Hanjung Liu
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Fractionating the cognitive control required to bring about a change in task: a dense-sensor event-related potential study.

Authors:  Duncan E Astle; G M Jackson; R Swainson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Is task switching nothing but cue priming? Evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Kerstin Jost; Ulrich Mayr; Frank Rösler
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Effects of caffeine on anticipatory control processes: evidence from a cued task-switch paradigm.

Authors:  Zoë Tieges; Jan Snel; Albert Kok; Niels Plat; Richard Ridderinkhof
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Advance preparation in task-switching: converging evidence from behavioral, brain activation, and model-based approaches.

Authors:  Frini Karayanidis; Sharna Jamadar; Hannes Ruge; Natalie Phillips; Andrew Heathcote; Birte U Forstmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-07-15
View more
  7 in total

1.  Cue response dissociates inhibitory processes: task identity information is related to backward inhibition but not to competitor rule suppression.

Authors:  Shirley Regev; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-13

2.  Competitor rule priming: evidence for priming of task rules in task switching.

Authors:  Maayan Katzir; Bnaya Ori; Shulan Hsieh; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-06-20

3.  Cue-type manipulation dissociates two types of task set inhibition: backward inhibition and competitor rule suppression.

Authors:  Shirley Regev; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-03-31

4.  "Optimal suppression" as a solution to the paradoxical cost of multitasking: examination of suppression specificity in task switching.

Authors:  Maayan Katzir; Bnaya Ori; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-10-27

5.  Cognitive control in number processing: new evidence from number compatibility effects in task-switching.

Authors:  A Schliephake; J Bahnmueller; K Willmes; I Koch; K Moeller
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2022-02-08

6.  Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depressed individuals improves suppression of irrelevant mental-sets.

Authors:  Jonathan Greenberg; Benjamin G Shapero; David Mischoulon; Sara W Lazar
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 5.270

7.  "Off with the old": mindfulness practice improves backward inhibition.

Authors:  Jonathan Greenberg; Keren Reiner; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.