Literature DB >> 24802654

A randomized phase 2 trial of gemcitabine/cisplatin with or without cetuximab in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Maha Hussain1, Stephanie Daignault, Neeraj Agarwal, Petros D Grivas, Arlene O Siefker-Radtke, Igor Puzanov, Gary R MacVicar, Ellis Glenn Levine, Sandy Srinivas, Przemyslaw Twardowski, Mario A Eisenberger, David I Quinn, Ulka N Vaishampayan, Evan Y Yu, Scott Dawsey, Kathleen C Day, Mark L Day, Mahmoud Al-Hawary, David C Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression is associated with poor outcomes in urothelial carcinoma (UC). Cetuximab (CTX) exhibited an antitumor effect in in vivo UC models. The efficacy of gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) with or without CTX in patients with advanced UC was evaluated.
METHODS: Patients with advanced UC, measurable disease, and adequate organ function were randomized 1:2 to cisplatin (70 mg/m(2) ) on day 1 plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) ) on days 1, 8, and 15 (arm A) or GC plus CTX (500 mg/m(2) ) on days 1 and 15 (arm B). The primary endpoint was the overall response rate. The secondary endpoints were the response duration, safety, progression-free survival, overall survival, determination of whether or not CTX sensitized nonresponders to GC, and exploratory biomarker analysis. The accrual targets were 27 and 54 patients for the 2 arms, respectively. The overall response rate was reported by arm with binomial confidence intervals (CIs). Kaplan-Meier methods were used for time-to-event endpoints.
RESULTS: Eighty-eight eligible patients were randomized; 87 were toxicity-evaluable, and 85 were response-evaluable. The overall response rates were 57.1% for arm A (95% CI = 37%-76%) and 61.4% for arm B (95% CI = 48%-74%). The median progression-free survival times were 8.5 months for arm A (95% CI = 5.7-10.4 months) and 7.6 months for arm B (95% CI = 6.1-8.7 months). The median overall survival times were 17.4 months for arm A (95% CI = 12.8 months to unreached) and 14.3 months for arm B (95% CI = 11.6-22.2 months). The most common grade 3/grade 4 adverse events in both arms were myelosuppression and nausea. Thromboembolism, acneiform rash, fatigue, pain, hypersensitivity reactions, elevated transaminases, hyponatremia, and hypomagnesemia were more common in arm B; 3 grade 5 adverse events occurred in arm B. The presence of primary disease significantly correlated with thromboembolism. An increased soluble E-cadherin level after cycle 2 correlated with a higher risk of death.
CONCLUSIONS: GC plus CTX was feasible but was associated with more adverse events and no improvements in outcomes.
© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cetuximab; chemotherapy; cisplatin; gemcitabine; urothelial carcinoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24802654      PMCID: PMC4142676          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  60 in total

1.  Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody C225 inhibits angiogenesis in human transitional cell carcinoma growing orthotopically in nude mice.

Authors:  P Perrotte; T Matsumoto; K Inoue; H Kuniyasu; B Y Eve; D J Hicklin; R Radinsky; C P Dinney
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  The epidermal growth factor receptor and the prognosis of bladder cancer.

Authors:  D E Neal; L Sharples; K Smith; J Fennelly; R R Hall; A L Harris
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Long-term outcome related to epidermal growth factor receptor status in bladder cancer.

Authors:  K Mellon; C Wright; P Kelly; C H Horne; D E Neal
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Clinical implications of the expression of epidermal growth factor receptors in human transitional cell carcinoma.

Authors:  E M Messing
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Combined treatment of bladder cancer cell lines with lapatinib and varying chemotherapy regimens--evidence of schedule-dependent synergy.

Authors:  Lynsey A McHugh; Marina Kriajevska; John K Mellon; Thomas R Griffiths
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  EGF promotes the shedding of soluble E-cadherin in an ADAM10-dependent manner in prostate epithelial cells.

Authors:  Magdalena M Grabowska; Brindar Sandhu; Mark L Day
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.315

7.  Inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor in bladder cancer cells treated with the DNA-damaging drug etoposide markedly increases apoptosis.

Authors:  Mathias Munk; Ashfaque Ahmed Memon; Ebba Nexo; Boe Sandahl Sorensen
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  A single-arm, multicenter, open-label phase 2 study of lapatinib as the second-line treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Christian Wülfing; Jean-Pascal H Machiels; Dirk J Richel; Marc-Oliver Grimm; Uwe Treiber; Marco R De Groot; Philippe Beuzeboc; Roma Parikh; Frank Pétavy; Iman A El-Hariry
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Epidermal-growth-factor receptors in human bladder cancer: comparison of invasive and superficial tumours.

Authors:  D E Neal; C Marsh; M K Bennett; P D Abel; R R Hall; J R Sainsbury; A L Harris
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-02-16       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor in bladder cancer as related to established prognostic factors, oncoprotein (c-erbB-2, p53) expression and long-term prognosis.

Authors:  P Lipponen; M Eskelinen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Targeting Signaling Transduction Pathways in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Phillip H Abbosh; David J McConkey; Elizabeth R Plimack
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer: an update on systemic therapy.

Authors:  Hayley Knollman; J Luke Godwin; Rishi Jain; Yu-Ning Wong; Elizabeth R Plimack; Daniel M Geynisman
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-12

3.  Clinical predictors and survival outcome of patients receiving suboptimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Luca Boeri; Matteo Soligo; Igor Frank; Stephen A Boorjian; R Houston Thompson; Matthew Tollefson; Robert Tarrel; Fernando J Quevedo; John C Cheville; R Jeffrey Karnes
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Risk of fatigue in cancer patients receiving anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jianhong Zhu; Wenxia Zhao; Dan Liang; Guocheng Li; Kaifeng Qiu; Junyan Wu; Jianfang Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Elevating the Horizon: Emerging Molecular and Genomic Targets in the Treatment of Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Metin Kurtoglu; Nicole N Davarpanah; Rui Qin; Thomas Powles; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Andrea B Apolo
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 6.  Emerging biomarkers and targeted therapies in urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Prateek Mendiratta; Petros Grivas
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-06

Review 7.  Targeted therapies in bladder cancer: an overview of in vivo research.

Authors:  Kim E M van Kessel; Tahlita C M Zuiverloon; Arnout R Alberts; Joost L Boormans; Ellen C Zwarthoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 8.  Improving Systemic Chemotherapy for Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Tracy L Rose; Matthew I Milowsky
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Cisplatin-based first-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma after previous perioperative cisplatin-based therapy.

Authors:  Andrea Necchi; Gregory R Pond; Patrizia Giannatempo; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Bernhard J Eigl; Jenn Locke; Sumanta K Pal; Neeraj Agarwal; Austin Poole; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Guenter Niegisch; Syed A Hussain; Parminder Singh; Joaquim Bellmunt; Guru Sonpavde
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 10.  Optimal treatment for metastatic bladder cancer.

Authors:  Estrella M Carballido; Jonathan E Rosenberg
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.