Benjamin A Mooso1, Ruth L Vinall2, Maria Mudryj3, Stanley A Yap4, Ralph W deVere White5, Paramita M Ghosh6. 1. Research Service, Veterans Affairs Northern California Health Care System, Sacramento, California. 2. California Northstate College of Pharmacy, Rancho Cordova, California. 3. Research Service, Veterans Affairs Northern California Health Care System, Sacramento, California; Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of California-Davis, Sacramento, California. 4. Research Service, Veterans Affairs Northern California Health Care System, Sacramento, California; Department of Urology, University of California-Davis, Sacramento, California. 5. Department of Urology, University of California-Davis, Sacramento, California. Electronic address: rwdeverewhite@ucdavis.edu. 6. Research Service, Veterans Affairs Northern California Health Care System, Sacramento, California; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of California-Davis, Sacramento, California; Department of Urology, University of California-Davis, Sacramento, California.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Conventional platinum based chemotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma is plagued by common resistance to this regimen. Several studies implicate the EGFR family of RTKs in urothelial carcinoma progression and chemoresistance. Many groups have investigated the effects of inhibitors of this family in patients with urothelial carcinoma. This review focuses on the underlying molecular pathways that lead to urothelial carcinoma resistance to EGFR family inhibitors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a PubMed® search for peer reviewed literature on bladder cancer development, EGFR family expression, clinical trials of EGFR family inhibitors and molecular bypass pathways. Research articles deemed to be relevant were examined and a summary of original data was created. Meta-analysis of expression profiles was also performed for each EGFR family member based on data sets accessible via Oncomine®. RESULTS: Many clinical trials using inhibitors of EGFR family RTKs have been done or are under way. Those that have concluded with results published to date do not show an added benefit over standard of care chemotherapy in an adjuvant or second line setting. However, a neoadjuvant study using erlotinib before radical cystectomy demonstrated promising results. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and preclinical studies show that for reasons not currently clear prior treatment with chemotherapeutic agents rendered patients with urothelial carcinoma with muscle invasive bladder cancer resistant to EGFR family inhibitors as well. However, EGFR family inhibitors may be of use in patients with no prior chemotherapy in whom EGFR or ERBB2 is over expressed.
PURPOSE: Conventional platinum based chemotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma is plagued by common resistance to this regimen. Several studies implicate the EGFR family of RTKs in urothelial carcinoma progression and chemoresistance. Many groups have investigated the effects of inhibitors of this family in patients with urothelial carcinoma. This review focuses on the underlying molecular pathways that lead to urothelial carcinoma resistance to EGFR family inhibitors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a PubMed® search for peer reviewed literature on bladder cancer development, EGFR family expression, clinical trials of EGFR family inhibitors and molecular bypass pathways. Research articles deemed to be relevant were examined and a summary of original data was created. Meta-analysis of expression profiles was also performed for each EGFR family member based on data sets accessible via Oncomine®. RESULTS: Many clinical trials using inhibitors of EGFR family RTKs have been done or are under way. Those that have concluded with results published to date do not show an added benefit over standard of care chemotherapy in an adjuvant or second line setting. However, a neoadjuvant study using erlotinib before radical cystectomy demonstrated promising results. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and preclinical studies show that for reasons not currently clear prior treatment with chemotherapeutic agents rendered patients with urothelial carcinoma with muscle invasive bladder cancer resistant to EGFR family inhibitors as well. However, EGFR family inhibitors may be of use in patients with no prior chemotherapy in whom EGFR or ERBB2 is over expressed.
Authors: Lars Dyrskjøt; Mogens Kruhøffer; Thomas Thykjaer; Niels Marcussen; Jens L Jensen; Klaus Møller; Torben F Ørntoft Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Edward Messing; Jason R Gee; Daniel R Saltzstein; KyungMann Kim; Anthony diSant'Agnese; Jill Kolesar; Linda Harris; Adrienne Faerber; Thomas Havighurst; Jay M Young; Mitchell Efros; Robert H Getzenberg; Marcia A Wheeler; Joseph Tangrea; Howard Parnes; Margaret House; J Erik Busby; Raymond Hohl; Howard Bailey Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2012-01-31
Authors: Christian Wülfing; Jean-Pascal H Machiels; Dirk J Richel; Marc-Oliver Grimm; Uwe Treiber; Marco R De Groot; Philippe Beuzeboc; Roma Parikh; Frank Pétavy; Iman A El-Hariry Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-07-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: J Alfred Witjes; Eva Compérat; Nigel C Cowan; Maria De Santis; Georgios Gakis; Thierry Lebret; Maria J Ribal; Antoine G Van der Heijden; Amir Sherif Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Olga Modlich; Hans-Bernd Prisack; Gerald Pitschke; Uwe Ramp; Rolf Ackermann; Hans Bojar; Thomas A Vögeli; Marc-Oliver Grimm Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-05-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Andrea Slusser-Nore; Scott H Garrett; Xu Dong Zhou; Donald A Sens; Mary Ann Sens; Seema Somji Journal: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 4.219
Authors: Shiuh-Rong Ho; Yu-Cheng Lee; Michael M Ittmann; Fang-Tsyr Lin; Keith Syson Chan; Weei-Chin Lin Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2021-08-13 Impact factor: 9.756
Authors: Noura J Choudhury; Alexa Campanile; Tatjana Antic; Kai Lee Yap; Carrie A Fitzpatrick; James L Wade; Theodore Karrison; Walter M Stadler; Yusuke Nakamura; Peter H O'Donnell Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 44.544