Literature DB >> 19398378

An investigation of the hypoalgesic effects of TENS delivered by a glove electrode.

Stephen Cowan1, Joanne McKenna, Evie McCrum-Gardner, Mark I Johnson, Kathleen A Sluka, Deirdre M Walsh.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded study investigated the hypoalgesic effects of high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) delivered via a glove electrode compared with standard self-adhesive electrodes. Fifty-six TENS-naïve, healthy individuals (18 to 50 years old; 28 men, 28 women) were randomly allocated to 1 of 4 groups (n = 14 per group): glove electrode; placebo TENS using a glove electrode; standard electrode; and no treatment control. Active TENS (continuous stimulus, 100 Hz, strong but comfortable intensity) was applied to the dominant forearm/hand for 30 minutes. Placebo TENS was applied using a burst stimulus, 100-Hz frequency, 5-second cycle time for 42 seconds, after which the current amplitude was automatically reset to 0 mA. Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were recorded from 3 points on the dominant and nondominant upper limbs before and after TENS. Statistical analyses of dominant PPT data using between-within groups ANOVA showed significant differences between groups at all 3 recording points (P = .01). Post hoc Scheffe tests indicated no significant difference between the standard electrode and glove electrode groups. There was a significant hypoalgesic effect in the standard electrode group compared with the control group and between the glove electrode group and both the control and placebo TENS groups. There was no significant interactive effect between time and group at any of the recording points (P > .05). PERSPECTIVE: This study presents a comparison of the hypoalgesic effects of 2 different types of TENS electrode, a novel glove electrode and standard self-adhesive rectangular electrodes. The glove electrode provides a larger contact area with the skin, thereby stimulating a greater number of nerve fibers. The results show that both electrodes have similar hypoalgesic effects and therefore give the clinician another choice in electrode.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19398378      PMCID: PMC2761234          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  27 in total

1.  Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on postoperative pain with movement.

Authors:  Barbara Rakel; Rita Frantz
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.820

2.  The effect of varying frequency and intensity of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on secondary mechanical hyperalgesia in an animal model of inflammation.

Authors:  E W King; K A Sluka
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Is mechanical pain threshold after transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) increased locally and unilaterally? A randomized placebo-controlled trial in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Reidar Aarskog; Mark I Johnson; Jan Hendrik Demmink; Anne Lofthus; Vegard Iversen; Rodrigo Lopes-Martins; Jon Joensen; Jan M Bjordal
Journal:  Physiother Res Int       Date:  2007-12

4.  Efficacy of electrical nerve stimulation for chronic musculoskeletal pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Michael Johnson; Melissa Martinson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Can trials of physical treatments be blinded? The example of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for chronic pain.

Authors:  R A Deyo; N E Walsh; L S Schoenfeld; S Ramamurthy
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.159

6.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for neuropathic pain.

Authors:  G L Y Cheing; M L M Luk
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  2005-02

Review 7.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic low-back pain.

Authors:  A Khadilkar; S Milne; L Brosseau; V Robinson; M Saginur; B Shea; P Tugwell; G Wells
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-07-20

8.  Evaluation of TENS during screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  Michele F Limoges; Barbara Rickabaugh
Journal:  Gastroenterol Nurs       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.978

9.  Interrater reliability of algometry in measuring pressure pain thresholds in healthy humans, using multiple raters.

Authors:  Linda S Chesterton; Julius Sim; Christine C Wright; Nadine E Foster
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 10.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in the hand.

Authors:  L Brosseau; M G Judd; S Marchand; V A Robinson; P Tugwell; G Wells; K Yonge
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003
View more
  9 in total

1.  Author response.

Authors:  Kathleen A Sluka; Jan M Bjordal; Serge Marchand; Barbara A Rakel
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-10

Review 2.  Using TENS for pain control: the state of the evidence.

Authors:  Carol G T Vance; Dana L Dailey; Barbara A Rakel; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Pain Manag       Date:  2014-05

3.  What makes transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation work? Making sense of the mixed results in the clinical literature.

Authors:  Kathleen A Sluka; Jan M Bjordal; Serge Marchand; Barbara A Rakel
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-05-02

4.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and conditioned pain modulation influence the perception of pain in humans.

Authors:  R E Liebano; C G Vance; B A Rakel; J E Lee; N A Cooper; S Marchand; D M Walsh; K A Sluka
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 3.931

5.  Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain, pain sensitivity, and function in people with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Carol Grace T Vance; Barbara A Rakel; Nicole P Blodgett; Josimari Melo DeSantana; Annunziato Amendola; Miriam Bridget Zimmerman; Deirdre M Walsh; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2012-03-30

6.  The effects of concentric ring electrode electrical stimulation on rat skin.

Authors:  W Besio; V Sharma; J Spaulding
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  A new transient sham TENS device allows for investigator blinding while delivering a true placebo treatment.

Authors:  Barbara Rakel; Nicholas Cooper; Heather J Adams; Bryan R Messer; Laura A Frey Law; Douglas R Dannen; Carrie A Miller; Anya C Polehna; Rachelle C Ruggle; Carol G T Vance; Deirdre M Walsh; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 5.820

8.  Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain, function, and quality of life in fibromyalgia: a double-blind randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Brian Noehren; Dana L Dailey; Barbara A Rakel; Carol G T Vance; Miriam B Zimmerman; Leslie J Crofford; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2014-09-11

9.  Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Reduces Movement-Evoked Pain and Fatigue: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Dana L Dailey; Carol G T Vance; Barbara A Rakel; M Bridget Zimmerman; Jennie Embree; Ericka N Merriwether; Katharine M Geasland; Ruth Chimenti; Jon M Williams; Meenakshi Golchha; Leslie J Crofford; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 15.483

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.