Literature DB >> 17957730

Is mechanical pain threshold after transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) increased locally and unilaterally? A randomized placebo-controlled trial in healthy subjects.

Reidar Aarskog1, Mark I Johnson, Jan Hendrik Demmink, Anne Lofthus, Vegard Iversen, Rodrigo Lopes-Martins, Jon Joensen, Jan M Bjordal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: It is not fully understood how transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) intensity affects mechanical pain threshold.
METHOD: Sixty-six healthy volunteers (13 male, 53 female; 132 hands) without prior experience of TENS participated in the study, which comprised a randomized single-blind controlled trial. TENS was administered for 20 minutes through electrodes (25 x 25 mm) placed on the hands and forearms with a fixed frequency of 100 Hz and pulse duration of 150 micros. TENS intensity was randomized and allocated in a concealed manner so that one arm received TENS with stimulation intensity set at participants' subjective sensory threshold and the other received TENS with stimulation intensity continuously adjusted by physiotherapists to a strong but comfortable non-painful stimulation. Observers were blinded to stimulation intensity levels.
RESULTS: Mechanical pain threshold increased significantly, by a mean total of 0.79 kg/cm2 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.54-1.04) (p < 0.001) on the strong but comfortable non-painful stimulation side. The mean change in mechanical pain threshold on the sensory threshold side was 0.19 kg/cm2 and did not reach statistical significance (95% CI-0.15 to 0.51). The mean stimulation intensity level for sensory threshold was 6.7 mA (95% CI: 5.65 to 7.83) which was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than the mean stimulation intensity for the strong stimulation, which was 20.5 mA (95% CI 16.6 to 24.4), respectively. The strong stimulation levels were, on average, 3.05 times higher than sensory threshold, but individual variations were large (range 1.2-6.1).
CONCLUSIONS: TENS administered at a strong but comfortable non-painful stimulation intensity increases mechanical pain threshold ipsi-laterally in healthy subjects, whereas TENS administered at sensory threshold intensity does not. TENS may be ineffective if electrodes are placed contralaterally or distant to the pain site and if stimulation intensity levels are not titrated to subjective strong levels. Further clinical trials are needed to clarify if these findings may also be generalized to populations of chronic pain sufferers. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17957730     DOI: 10.1002/pri.384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Res Int        ISSN: 1358-2267


  17 in total

Review 1.  Using TENS for pain control: the state of the evidence.

Authors:  Carol G T Vance; Dana L Dailey; Barbara A Rakel; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Pain Manag       Date:  2014-05

2.  What makes transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation work? Making sense of the mixed results in the clinical literature.

Authors:  Kathleen A Sluka; Jan M Bjordal; Serge Marchand; Barbara A Rakel
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-05-02

Review 3.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for acute pain.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson; Carole A Paley; Tracey E Howe; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-15

4.  A new transient sham TENS device allows for investigator blinding while delivering a true placebo treatment.

Authors:  Barbara Rakel; Nicholas Cooper; Heather J Adams; Bryan R Messer; Laura A Frey Law; Douglas R Dannen; Carrie A Miller; Anya C Polehna; Rachelle C Ruggle; Carol G T Vance; Deirdre M Walsh; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 5.820

5.  An investigation of the hypoalgesic effects of TENS delivered by a glove electrode.

Authors:  Stephen Cowan; Joanne McKenna; Evie McCrum-Gardner; Mark I Johnson; Kathleen A Sluka; Deirdre M Walsh
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 6.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for fibromyalgia in adults.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson; Leica S Claydon; G Peter Herbison; Gareth Jones; Carole A Paley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-09

Review 7.  Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for treatment of hyperalgesia and pain.

Authors:  Josimari M DeSantana; Deirdre M Walsh; Carol Vance; Barbara A Rakel; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.592

8.  Development and application of a newly designed massage instrument for deep cross-friction massage in chronic non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Yong-Soon Yoon; Ki-Pi Yu; Kwang Jae Lee; Soo-Hyun Kwak; Jong Yun Kim
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2012-02-29

9.  High-frequency transcutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation induces a higher increase of heat pain threshold in the cutaneous area of the stimulated nerve when confronted to the neighbouring areas.

Authors:  M Buonocore; N Camuzzini; M Cecini; E Dalla Toffola
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Intensity matters: Therapist-dependent dose of spinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Diego Serrano-Muñoz; Julio Gómez-Soriano; Elisabeth Bravo-Esteban; María Vázquez-Fariñas; Julian Taylor; Juan Avendaño-Coy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.