Literature DB >> 19397858

The effect of non-visual working memory load on top-down modulation of visual processing.

Jesse Rissman1, Adam Gazzaley, Mark D'Esposito.   

Abstract

While a core function of the working memory (WM) system is the active maintenance of behaviorally relevant sensory representations, it is also critical that distracting stimuli are appropriately ignored. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine the role of domain-general WM resources in the top-down attentional modulation of task-relevant and irrelevant visual representations. In our dual-task paradigm, each trial began with the auditory presentation of six random (high load) or sequentially ordered (low load) digits. Next, two relevant visual stimuli (e.g., faces), presented amongst two temporally interspersed visual distractors (e.g., scenes), were to be encoded and maintained across a 7-s delay interval, after which memory for the relevant images and digits was probed. When taxed by high load digit maintenance, participants exhibited impaired performance on the visual WM task and a selective failure to attenuate the neural processing of task-irrelevant scene stimuli. The over-processing of distractor scenes under high load was indexed by elevated encoding activity in a scene-selective region-of-interest relative to low load and passive viewing control conditions, as well as by improved long-term recognition memory for these items. In contrast, the load manipulation did not affect participants' ability to upregulate activity in this region when scenes were task-relevant. These results highlight the critical role of domain-general WM resources in the goal-directed regulation of distractor processing. Moreover, the consequences of increased WM load in young adults closely resemble the effects of cognitive aging on distractor filtering [Gazzaley, A., Cooney, J. W., Rissman, J., & D'Esposito, M. (2005). Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nature Neuroscience 8, 1298-1300], suggesting the possibility of a common underlying mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19397858      PMCID: PMC2701233          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  52 in total

Review 1.  Interactions between attention and working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; E K Vogel; S-H Oh
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Nonvisual codes and nonvisual brain areas support visual working memory.

Authors:  Bradley R Postle; Massihullah Hamidi
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Attentional modulation of object representations in working memory.

Authors:  Jöran Lepsien; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia control access to working memory.

Authors:  Fiona McNab; Torkel Klingberg
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-09       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Functional interactions between prefrontal and visual association cortex contribute to top-down modulation of visual processing.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Jesse Rissman; Jeffrey Cooney; Aaron Rutman; Tyler Seibert; Wesley Clapp; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Concurrent working memory load can facilitate selective attention: evidence for specialized load.

Authors:  Soojin Park; Min-Shik Kim; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Interactions between visual working memory and visual attention.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2008-01-01

8.  Common neural substrates for visual working memory and attention.

Authors:  Jutta S Mayer; Robert A Bittner; Danko Nikolić; Christoph Bledowski; Rainer Goebel; David E J Linden
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Age-related deficits in component processes of working memory.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Margaret A Sheridan; Jeffrey W Cooney; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Domain specificity in visual cortex.

Authors:  P E Downing; A W-Y Chan; M V Peelen; C M Dodds; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  45 in total

1.  Neural indices of improved attentional modulation over middle childhood.

Authors:  C Wendelken; C L Baym; A Gazzaley; S A Bunge
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.464

2.  Early use of magnetic endoscopic imaging by novice colonoscopists: improved performance without increase in workload.

Authors:  Sylvain Coderre; John Anderson; Remy Rikers; Paul Dunckley; Karen Holbrook; Kevin McLaughlin
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 3.  Twenty years of load theory-Where are we now, and where should we go next?

Authors:  Gillian Murphy; John A Groeger; Ciara M Greene
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

Review 4.  Influence of early attentional modulation on working memory.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  The impact of executive capacity and age on mechanisms underlying multidimensional feature selection.

Authors:  Katherine K Mott; Brittany R Alperin; Anne M Fox; Phillip J Holcomb; Kirk R Daffner
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Practice-related improvement in working memory is modulated by changes in processing external interference.

Authors:  Anne S Berry; Theodore P Zanto; Aaron M Rutman; Wesley C Clapp; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The influence of emotional distraction on verbal working memory: an fMRI investigation comparing individuals with schizophrenia and healthy adults.

Authors:  Michele T Diaz; George He; Syam Gadde; Carolyn Bellion; Aysenil Belger; James T Voyvodic; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 4.791

8.  Word intelligibility and age predict visual cortex activity during word listening.

Authors:  Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Kenneth I Vaden; Noam I Keren; Kelly C Harris; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Expectations of Task Demands Dissociate Working Memory and Long-Term Memory Systems.

Authors:  T P Zanto; W C Clapp; M T Rubens; J Karlsson; A Gazzaley
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control.

Authors:  Agatha Lenartowicz; Gregory V Simpson; Samantha R O'Connell; Mark S Cohen
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.