Literature DB >> 17150984

Nonvisual codes and nonvisual brain areas support visual working memory.

Bradley R Postle1, Massihullah Hamidi.   

Abstract

Systems models hold working memory to depend on specialized, domain-specific storage buffers. Here, however, we demonstrate that short-term retention of the identity or location of visually presented stimuli is disrupted by nonvisual secondary tasks performed in the dark-passive listening to nouns or endogenous generation of saccades, respectively. This indicates that the short-term retention of visual information relies on multiple mental codes, some of them nonvisual. Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) reveals the neural correlates of these interference effects to be more complex and more regionally specific than previously described. Although nonspecific dual-task effects produce a generalized decrease of task-evoked fMRI response across many brain regions, the interference-specific effect is a relative increase of activity localized to regions associated with the secondary task in question: left hemisphere perisylvian cortex in the case of passive listening distraction and frontal oculomotor regions in the case of saccadic distraction. Within these regions, the neural interference effects are specific to voxels that show delay-period activity on unfilled memory trials. They also predict individual differences in the magnitude of the behavioral interference effect. These results indicate that nonvisual processes supported by nonvisual brain areas contribute importantly to "visual" working memory performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17150984     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhl123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  15 in total

1.  Delayed match-to-sample in working memory: A BrainMap meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas A Daniel; Jeffrey S Katz; Jennifer L Robinson
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  Value-driven attentional capture is modulated by the contents of working memory: An EEG study.

Authors:  T Hinault; K J Blacker; M Gormley; B A Anderson; S M Courtney
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Short-term memory stages in sign vs. speech: the source of the serial span discrepancy.

Authors:  Matthew L Hall; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-03-29

4.  Eye-movements reveal the serial position of the attended item in verbal working memory.

Authors:  Muhammet Ikbal Sahan; Jean-Philippe van Dijck; Wim Fias
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-09-28

5.  Evaluating frontal and parietal contributions to spatial working memory with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Massihullah Hamidi; Giulio Tononi; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Neural Evidence for the Flexible Control of Mental Representations.

Authors:  Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock; Andrew T Drysdale; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Intracranial electroencephalography reveals two distinct similarity effects during item recognition.

Authors:  Marieke K van Vugt; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Robert Sekuler; Brian Litt; Armin Brandt; Gordon Baltuch; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Persistent neural activity during the maintenance of spatial position in working memory.

Authors:  Riju Srimal; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The effect of non-visual working memory load on top-down modulation of visual processing.

Authors:  Jesse Rissman; Adam Gazzaley; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Using EEG to explore how rTMS produces its effects on behavior.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; Massihullah Hamidi; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.