Literature DB >> 19385770

Do incentives exert undue influence on survey participation? Experimental evidence.

Eleanor Singer1, Mick P Couper.   

Abstract

MONETARY INCENTIVES ARE INCREASINGLY used to help motivate survey participation. Research Ethics Committees have begun to ask whether, and under what conditions, the use of monetary incentives to induce participation might be coercive. The article reports research from an online vignette-based study bearing on this question, concluding that at present the evidence suggests that larger incentives do not induce research participants to accept higher risks than they would be unwilling to accept with smaller ones.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19385770      PMCID: PMC2600442          DOI: 10.1525/jer.2008.3.3.49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  15 in total

1.  Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation: description and an illustration.

Authors:  R M Groves; E Singer; A Corning
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

2.  (Almost) everything you ever wanted to know about informed consent. [Review of: Faden, RR and Beauchamp, TL. A history and theory of informed concsent. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986].

Authors:  A M Capron
Journal:  Med Humanit Rev       Date:  1987-01

Review 3.  Ending concerns about undue inducement.

Authors:  Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  Improving informed consent and enhancing recruitment for research by understanding economic behavior.

Authors:  Laura B Dunn; Nora E Gordon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Addiction and autonomy: can addicted people consent to the prescription of their drug of addiction?

Authors:  Bennett Foddy; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.898

6.  Incentives for survey participation when are they "coercive"?

Authors:  Eleanor Singer; Robert M Bossarte
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?

Authors:  A Wertheimer; F G Miller
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Ethics in human subjects research: do incentives matter?

Authors:  Ruth W Grant; Jeremy Sugarman
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2004-12

9.  Risk of Disclosure, Perceptions of Risk, and Concerns about Privacy and Confidentiality as Factors in Survey Participation.

Authors:  Mick P Couper; Eleanor Singer; Frederick G Conrad; Robert M Groves
Journal:  J Off Stat       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 0.920

10.  The ethics of paying drug users who participate in research: a review and practical recommendations.

Authors:  Craig L Fry; Wayne Hall; Alison Ritter; Rebecca Jenkinson
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.742

View more
  33 in total

1.  The role of perceived benefits and costs in patients' medical decisions.

Authors:  Eleanor Singer; Mick P Couper; Angela Fagerlin; Floyd J Fowler; Carrie A Levin; Peter A Ubel; John Van Hoewyk; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Voluntary consent: why a value-neutral concept won't work.

Authors:  Alan Wertheimer
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2012-05-02

3.  Examination of Bias in Study of Clinic Closures.

Authors:  Margaret V Power
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Survey says? A primer on web-based survey design and distribution.

Authors:  Adam J Oppenheimer; Christopher J Pannucci; Steven J Kasten; Steven C Haase
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  "They Can't Search Her": How Gender Imbalances in the Police Force Contribute to Perceptions of Procedural Unfairness.

Authors:  Madeleine Novich; Anne Li Kringen; Geoffrey Hunt
Journal:  Fem Criminol       Date:  2018-01-24

6.  Methodological approaches to evaluate the impact of FDA drug safety communications.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim; Eric G Campbell; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Paula Rausch; Brian M Lappin; Esther H Zhou; John D Seeger; John S Brownstein; Steven Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz; Timothy Toomey; Gerald J Dal Pan; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Enhancing HIV vaccine trial consent preparedness among street drug users.

Authors:  Celia B Fisher
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Feasibility of assessing training of primary care dental practitioners in endodontics of moderate complexity: mapping process and learning.

Authors:  S Eliyas; P F A Briggs; J T Newton; J E Gallagher
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 1.626

9.  Bioethical Issues in Providing Financial Incentives to Research Participants.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Medicoleg Bioeth       Date:  2015-06-24

10.  Tailored Panel Management: A Theory-Based Approach to Building and Maintaining Participant Commitment to a Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Mica Estrada; Anna Woodcock; P Wesley Schultz
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2014-03-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.