Literature DB >> 30416400

"They Can't Search Her": How Gender Imbalances in the Police Force Contribute to Perceptions of Procedural Unfairness.

Madeleine Novich1, Anne Li Kringen2, Geoffrey Hunt3,4.   

Abstract

Research suggests that gender imbalances in police forces can significantly affect individuals' experiences when interacting with police. Of importance, yet rarely examined, is the extent to which predominantly male police forces, in conjunction with adherence to gendered departmental policies, can simultaneously send signals of procedural justice and procedural injustice. Drawing on data from 253 in-depth interviews of San Francisco-based male and female drug-dealing gang members, we investigated how interactions with a male-dominated police force, who were required to search only suspects of the same gender, affected perceptions of fair policing. Our findings revealed that the study participants raised concerns that the police unfairly enforced the law to the detriment of the men in the study. The gang members were aware that male officers could only search same-sex suspects, and this exacerbated the gendered experiences of the gang members. Specifically, it contributed to the perception that male officers targeted male gang members to the omission of women and, if women were stopped, they were frequently released. These findings suggest that the gender composition of the police force is important in shaping attitudes toward equitable enforcement of the law and procedural fairness. Of theoretical importance, these findings highlight a contradiction that compliance with rules can contribute, counter intuitively, to perceptions of procedural injustice. Procedurally unfair police behavior may be a systemic problem where the gender composition of the police force itself creates an inherently unfair system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  female police; gang members; gender and policing; policing; procedural justice

Year:  2018        PMID: 30416400      PMCID: PMC6219469          DOI: 10.1177/1557085117753669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fem Criminol        ISSN: 1557-0851


  10 in total

1.  On paying money to research subjects: 'due' and 'undue' inducements.

Authors:  Ruth Macklin
Journal:  IRB       Date:  1981-05

2.  The role of authority power in explaining procedural fairness effects.

Authors:  Marius van Dijke; David De Cremer; David M Mayer
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2010-05

3.  Incentives for survey participation when are they "coercive"?

Authors:  Eleanor Singer; Robert M Bossarte
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation.

Authors:  David De Cremer; Tom R Tyler
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2007-05

5.  Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?

Authors:  A Wertheimer; F G Miller
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Cultural mechanisms and the persistence of neighborhood violence.

Authors:  David S Kirk; Andrew V Papachristos
Journal:  AJS       Date:  2011-01

7.  Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Kathy Charmaz Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Sage 224 £19.99 0761973532 0761973532 [Formula: see text].

Authors: 
Journal:  Nurse Res       Date:  2006-07-01

8.  Young Mother (in the) Hood: Gang Girls' Negotiation of New Identities.

Authors:  Geoffrey Hunt; Molly Moloney; Karen Joe-Laidler; Kathleen McKenzie
Journal:  J Youth Stud       Date:  2011-02-01

9.  "Get Off Me": Perceptions of Disrespectful Police Behavior among Ethnic Minority Youth Gang Members.

Authors:  Madeleine Novich; Geoffrey Hunt
Journal:  Drugs (Abingdon Engl)       Date:  2016-11-06

10.  Do incentives exert undue influence on survey participation? Experimental evidence.

Authors:  Eleanor Singer; Mick P Couper
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.742

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.